Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation of time and repeated cycles in nucleate pool boiling of alumina/water nanofluid on polished and machined surfaces

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pool boiling heat transfer of pure water and nanofluids on a copper block has been studied experimentally. Nanofluids with various concentrations of 0.0025, 0.005 and 0.01 vol.% are employed and two simple surfaces (polished and machined copper surface) are used as the heating surfaces. The results indicated that the critical heat flux (CHF) in boiling of fluids on the polished surface is ~7% higher than CHF on the machined surface. In the case of machined surface, the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) of 0.01 vol.% nanofluid is about 37% higher than HTC of base fluid, while in the polished surface the average HTC of 0.01% nanofluid is about 19% lower than HTC of the pure water. The results also showed that the boiling time and boiling cycles on the polished surface changes the heat transfer performance. By increasing the boiling time from 5 to 10 min, the roughness enhances about 150%, but by increasing the boiling time to 15 min, the roughness enhancement is only 8%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Boiling surface [m2]

Cp :

Special heat [J kg /K]

Csf :

Coefficient in Rosehnow equation

g:

Acceleration due to gravity [m/s2]

h:

Heat transfer coefficient [W /m2.K]

hfg :

Latent heat of vaporization [J /kg]

I:

Current [Amps]

k:

Thermal conductivity [W/m.K]

q”:

Heat flux [kW/m2]

Ra, Rp, Rq, and Rz :

Standardized roughness parameter [μm]

T:

Temperature [°C]

V:

Voltage [Volts]

Z(x):

Profile ordinates of roughness profile [μm]

Pr:

Prandtl number, C P μ/K

δ :

Distance of thermocouple from the boiling surface [m]

μ :

Dynamic viscosity [Pa.s]

ρ :

Density [kg/m3]

σ :

Surface tension coefficient [N/m]

sat:

Saturation

l:

Liquid

v:

Vapor

w:

Surface

m:

Measured

References

  1. Kshirsagar JM, Shrivastava R (2015) Review of the influence of nanoparticles on thermal conductivity, nucleate pool boiling and critical heat flux. Heat Mass Transf 51:381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hegde RN, Shrikantha Rao S, Reddy RP (2012) Boiling induced nanoparticle coating and its effect on pool boiling heat transfer on a vertical cylindrical surface using CuO nanofluids. Heat Mass Transf 48:1549–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sohel Murshed SM, Nieto de Castro CA, Lourenc JVM, Lopes LM, Santos FJV (2011) A review of boiling and convective heat transfer with nanofluids. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:2342–2354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haghshenasfard M, Yeoh GH, Dahari M, Hooman K (2015) On numerical study of calcium sulphate fouling under sub-cooled flow boiling conditions. Appl Therm Eng 81:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim H, Kim M (2009) Experimental study of the characteristics and mechanism of pool boiling CHF enhancement using nanofluids. Heat Mass Transf 45(7):991–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park KJ, Jung D, Shim SE (2009) Nucleate boiling heat transfer in aqueous solutions with carbon nanotubes up to critical heat fluxes. Int J Multiphase Flow 35:525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hegde RN, Rao SS, Reddy RP (2012) Experimental studies on CHF enhancement in pool boiling with CuO-water nanofluid. Heat Mass Transf 48:1031–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goloič I, Ferjnčič F (2000) The role of enhanced coated surface in pool boiling CHF in FC-72. Heat Mass Transf 36:525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raveshi MR, Keshavarz A, Salemi Mojarrad M, Amiri S (2013) Experimental investigation of pool boiling heat transfer enhancement of alumina–water–ethylene glycol nanofluids. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 44:805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. You SM, Kim JH, Kim KH (2003) Effect of Nanoparticles on Critical Heat Flux of Water in Pool Boiling Heat Transfer. Appl Phys Lett 83:3374–3376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Das SK, Putra N, Roetzel W (2003) Pool boiling characterization of nano-fluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(46):851–862

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Das SK, Narayan GP, Baby AK (2008) Survey on Nucleate Pool Boiling of Nanofluids: the Effect of Particle Size relative to Roughness. J Nanopart Res 10:1099–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wen D, Ding Y (2005) Experimental investigation into the pool boiling heat transfer of aqueous based alumina nanofluids. J Nanopart Res 7:265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bang IC, Chang SH (2005) Boiling heat transfer performance and phenomena of Al2O3-water nano-fluids from a plain surface in a pool, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 48:2407–2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim SJ, Bang IC. Buongiorno J. Hu LW. (2007) Surface wettability change during pool boiling of nanofluids and its effect on critical heat flux, Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 50: 4105-4116.

  16. Milanova D. Kumar R. (2005) Role of Ions in Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Pure and Silica Nanofluids, Appl. Phys. Lett., 87: 233107.

  17. Milanova D, Kumar R (2008) Heat transfer behavior of silica nanoparticles in pool boiling experiment. J Heat Transf 130(4):042401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chopkar M, Das AK, Manna I, Das PK (2008) Pool boiling heat transfer characteristics of ZrO2-water nanofluids from a flat surface in a pool. Heat Mass Transf 44:999–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kathiravan R, Kumar R, Gupta A, Chandra R (2010) Preparation and pool boiling characteristics of copper nanofluids over a flat plate heater. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:1673–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shahmoradi Z, Etesami N, Nasr EM (2013) Pool boiling characteristics of nanofluid on flat plate based on heater surface analysis. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 47:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarafraz M, Hormozi F (2014) Nucleate pool boiling heat transfer characteristics of dilute Al2O3–ethylene glycol nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 58:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luke A (2009) Preparation and analysis of different roughness structures for evaporator tubes. Heat Mass Transf 45:909–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kotthoff S, Gorenflo D (2009) Heat transfer and bubble formation on horizontal copper tubes with different diameters and roughness structures. Heat Mass Transf 45:893–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moffat JR (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid 1:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pioro IL (1999) Experimental evaluation of constants for the Rohsenow pool boiling correlation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 42:2003–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vafaei S Nanofluid pool boiling heat transfer phenomenon. Powder Technol 277:181–192

  27. Narayan GP, Anoop KB, Das SK (2007) Mechanism of enhancement/deterioration of boiling heat transfer using stable nanoparticle suspensions over vertical tubes. J Appl Phys 102:0743171–0743177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kwark SM, Kumar R, Moreno G, Yoo J, You SM (2010) Pool boiling characteristics of low concentration nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:972–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. White SB, Shih AJ, Pipe KP (2010) Effects of nanoparticle layering on nanofluid and base fluid pool boiling heat transfer from a horizontal surface under atmospheric pressure. J Appl Phys 107:1143021–1143026

    Google Scholar 

  30. Phan HT, Caney N, Marty P, Colasson SP, Gavillet J (2010) Surface coatingwith nanofluids: The effects on pool boiling heat transfer, Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Engineering 14:229–244

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sarit K, Das G, Narayan P, Anoop BK (2008) Survey on nucleate pool boiling of nanofluids: the effect of particle size relative to roughness. J Nanopart Res 10:1099–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Golubovic MN, Madhawa Hettiarachchi HD, Worek WM, Minkowycz WJ (2009) Nanofluids and critical heat flux, experimental and analytical study. Appl Therm Eng 29:1281–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang YM, Maa JR (1984) Boiling of suspension of solid particles in water. Int J Heat Mass Transf 27(1):145–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Das SK, Putra N, Roetzel W (2003) Pool boiling characteristic of nanofluids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 46:851–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou SQ, Ni R (2008) Measurement of the specific heat capacity of water-based Al2O3 nanofluid. Appl Phys Lett 92(9):093123–093123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cao J, Ding Y, Ma C (2014) Aqueous Al2O3 nanofluids: the important factors impacting convective heat transfer. Heat Mass Transf 50(12):1639–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Khurana D, Choudhary R, Subudhi S (2016) A critical review of forced convection heat transfer and pressure drop of Al2O3, TiO2 and CuO nanofluids. Heat Mass Transf 53(1):343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative Council for providing financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Haghshenasfard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajabzadeh Dareh, F., Haghshenasfard, M., Nasr Esfahany, M. et al. Experimental investigation of time and repeated cycles in nucleate pool boiling of alumina/water nanofluid on polished and machined surfaces. Heat Mass Transfer 54, 1653–1668 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2266-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2266-2

Navigation