Heat and Mass Transfer

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 813–829 | Cite as

An experimental investigation on heat transfer enhancement in the laminar flow of water/TiO2 nanofluid through a tube heat exchanger fitted with modified butterfly inserts

  • K. P. Venkitaraj
  • S. Suresh
  • T. Alwin Mathew
  • B. S. Bibin
  • Jisa Abraham
Original
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Nanofluids are advanced heat transfer fluids that exhibit thermal properties superior than that of the conventional fluids such as water, oil etc. This paper reports the experimental study on convective heat transfer characteristics of water based titanium dioxide nanofluids in fully developed flow through a uniformly heated pipe heat exchanger fitted with modified butterfly inserts. Nanofluids are prepared by dispersing TiO2 nanoparticles of average particle size 29 nm in deionized water. The heat transfer experiments are performed in laminar regime using nanofluids prepared with 0.1% and 0.3% volume fractions of TiO2 nanoparticles. The thermal performance characteristics of conventional butterfly inserts and modified butterfly inserts are also compared using TiO2 nanofluid. The inserts with different pitches 6 cm, 9 cm and 12 cm are tested to determine the effect of pitch distance of inserts in the heat transfer and friction. The experimental results showed that the modification made in the butterfly inserts were able to produce higher heat transfer than conventional butterfly inserts.

Abbreviations

Symbols

A

Cross sectional Area (m2)

cp

Specific heat (J/kg-K)

D

Test section diameter (m)

f

Friction factor

h

Convection heat transfer coefficient (W/m2-K)

k

Thermal conductivity (W/m-K)

m

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

Nu

Nusselt number

p

pitch distance (m)

q

Actual heat flux (W/m2)

S

Surface area (m2)

v

Fluid velocity (m/s)

Re

Reynolds number

W

Weight (kg)

x

Axial distance from the tube entrance (m)

μ

Dynamic viscosity (N-s/m2)

ρ

Density (kg/m3)

φ

Volume concentration (%)

∆p

Pressure drop (N/m2)

η

Thermal Performance Factor

Subscripts

f

Base Fluid

in

Inlet

nf

Nanofluid

out

Outlet

w

Wall

pt

Plain tube

p

Particle

t

Total

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank TEQIP-II, a World Bank Project of MHRD, and Government of India for its financial support provided for establishing the necessary infrastructure to execute this experimental work.

References

  1. 1.
    S.U.S. Choi (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In: Signer DA, Wang HP (eds) Developments Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows, FED-vol. 231/MD-vol. 66. ASME, New York, pp 99–105Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keblinski P, Philpot SR, Choi SUS, Eastman JA (2002) Mechanisms of heat flow in suspensions of nano-sized particles (nanofluids). Int J Heat Mass Transf 45:855–863CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ravi Sankar B, Nageswara Rao D, Rao S (2012) Nanofluid thermal conductivity-a review. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology 5(1):13–28Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferrouillat S, Bontemps A, Ribeiro JP, Gruss JA, Soriano O (2011) Hydraulic and heat transfer study of SiO2/water nanofluids in horizontal tubes with imposed wall temperature boundry conditions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 32:424–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2010) An experimental study on the heat transfer performance and pressure drop of TiO2-water nanofluids flowing under a turbulent flow regime. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:334–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M (2011) Synthesis of Al2O3–Cu/water hybrid nanofluids using two step method and its thermo physical properties, S., Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. ASp 388:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Hameed MS, Sarangan J (2014) Turbulent Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics of Dilute Water Based Al2O3–Cu Hybrid Nanofluids. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14(3):2563–2572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M (2012) Effect of Al2O3–Cu/water hybrid nanofluid in heat transfer. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 38:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar A, Prasad BN (2000) Investigation of twisted tape inserted solar water heaters-heat transfer, friction factor and thermal performance results. Renew Energy 19:379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sivashanmugam P, Suresh S (2006) Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of laminar flow through a circular tube fitted with helical screw-tape inserts. Appl Therm Eng 26:1990–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sivashanmugam P, Suresh S (2007) Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of turbulent flow through a circular tube fitted with helical screw-tape inserts. Appl Therm Eng 27:1311–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sivashanmugam P, Suresh S (2007) Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of turbulent flow through a circular tube fitted with helical screw-tape inserts. J Chem Eng Process 46(12):1292–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sivashanmugam P, Suresh S (2007) Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of laminar flow through a circular tube fitted with regularly spaced helical screw-tape inserts. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 31:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eiamsa-ard S, Promvonge P (2007) Heat transfer characteristics in a tube fitted with helical screw-tape with/without core-rod inserts. Int Commun Heat and Mass Transfer 34:176–185CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shabanian SR, Rahimi M, Shahhosseini M, Alsairafi AA (2011) CFD and experimental studies on heat transfer enhancement in an air cooler equipped with different tube inserts. Int Commun Heat and Mass Transfer 38:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaisankar S, Radhakrishnan TK, Sheeba KN (2009) Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of forced circulation solar water heater system fitted with helical twisted tapes. Sol Energy 83:1943–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharma KV, Syam Sundar L, Sarma PK (2009) Estimation of heat transfer coefficient and friction factor in the transition flow with low volume concentration of Al2O3 nanofluid flowing in a circular tube and with twisted tape insert. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 36:503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Syam Sundar L, Sharma KV (2010) Turbulent heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 nanofluid in circular tube with twisted tape inserts. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 53:1409–1416CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hejazi V, Akhavan-Behabadi MA, Afshari A (2010) Experimental investigation of twisted tape inserts performance on condensation heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 37:1376–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murugesan P, Mayilsamy K, Suresh S, Srinivasan PSS (2011) Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics in a circular tube fitted with and without V-cut twisted tape insert. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 38:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ibrahim EZ (2011) Augmentation of laminar flow and heat transfer in flat tubes by means of helical screw tape inserts. Energ Convers Manage 52:250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naphon P, Suchana T (2011) Heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop of the horizontal concentric tube with twisted wires brush inserts. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 38:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo J, Fan A, Zhang X, Liu W (2011) A numerical study on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of laminar flow in a circular tube fitted with center-cleared twisted tape. Int J Therm Sci 50:1263–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wongcharee K, Eiamsa-ard S (2011) Friction and heat transfer characteristics of laminar swirl flow through the round tubes inserted with alternate clockwise and counter-clockwise twisted tapes. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 38:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wongcharee K, Eiamsa-ard S (2011) Enhancement of heat transfer using CuO/water nanofluid and twisted tape with alternate axis. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 38:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bhuiya MMK, Ahamed JU, Chowdhury MSU, Sarkar MAR, Salam B, Saidur R, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA (2012) Heat transfer enhancement and development of correlation for turbulent flow through a tube with triple helical tape inserts. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 39(1):94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P (2011) Comparative study on thermal performance of helical screw tape inserts in laminar flow using Al2O3/water and CuO/water nanofluids. Superlattice Microst 49:608–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M (2012) A comparison of thermal characteristics of Al2O3/water and CuO/water nanofluids in transition flow through a straight circular duct fitted with helical screw tape inserts. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 39:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Azaria A, Derakhshandeh M (2015) An experimental comparison of convective heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 nanofluids in a tube with and without butterfly tube inserts. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 52:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ba-Abbad M, Kadhum AH, Mohamad A, Takriff MS, Sopian K (2012) Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Photochemical Oxidation of Concentrated Chlorophenols under Direct Solar Radiation. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:4871–4888Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chandra Sekhara Reddy M, Rao VV (2014) Experimental investigation of heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of ethylene glycol water based TiO2 nanofluid in double pipe heat exchanger with and without helical coil inserts. Int Commun Heat and Mass Transfer 50:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pak BC, Cho YI (1998) Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transfer 11:151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xuan Y, Roetzel W (2000) Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 43:3701–3707CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Coleman HW, Steele WG (1989) Experimental and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    ANSI/ASME (1986) Measurement uncertainty, part 1. Instruments and apparatus: American National Standards Institute/American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ANSI/ASME PTC 19.1-1985. ANSI/ASME, New York, 68ppGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shah RK (1975) Thermal entry length solutions for the circular tube and parallel plates. Proceedings of Third National Heat Mass Transfer Conference, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, pp 11–75Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Usui H, Sano Y, Iwashita K, Isozaki A (1996) Enhancement of heat transfer by a combination of internally grooved rough tube and twisted tape. Int Chem Eng 26:97–104Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen H, Yang W, He Y, Ding Y, Zhang L, Tan C, Lapkin AA, Bavykin VV (2008) Heat transfer behaviour of aqueous suspensions of titanate nanofluids. Powder Technol 183:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wen D, Ding Y (2004) Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluid at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:5181–5188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of TechnologyTiruchirappalliIndia
  2. 2.College of EngineeringAdoorIndia

Personalised recommendations