Heat and Mass Transfer

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 803–812 | Cite as

Experimental evaluation of refrigerant mass charge and ambient air temperature effects on performance of air-conditioning systems

  • Mahdi Deymi-Dashtebayaz
  • Mehdi Farahnak
  • Mojtaba Moraffa
  • Arash Ghalami
  • Nima Mohammadi
Original
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper the effects of refrigerant charge amount and ambient air temperature on performance and thermodynamic condition of refrigerating cycle in the split type air-conditioner have been investigated. Optimum mass charge is the point at which the energy efficiency ratio (EER) of refrigeration cycle becomes the maximum. Experiments have been conducted over a range of refrigerant mass charge from 540 to 840 g and a range of ambient temperature from 27 to 45 °C, in a 12,000 Btu/h split air-conditioner as case study. The various parameters have been considered to evaluate the cooling rate, energy efficiency ratio (EER), mass charge effect and thermodynamic cycle of refrigeration system with R22 refrigerant gas. Results confirmed that the lack of appropriate refrigerant mass charge causes the refrigeration system not to reach its maximum cooling capacity. The highest cooling capacity achieved was 3.2 kW (11,000 Btu/h). The optimum mass charge and corresponding EER of studied system have been obtained about 640 g and 2.5, respectively. Also, it is observed that EER decreases by 30% as ambient temperature increases from 27 °C to 45 °C. By optimization of the refrigerant mass charge in refrigerating systems, about 785 GWh per year of electric energy can be saved in Iran’s residential sector.

Nomenclature

ΔEER,

EER improvement

ΔTSC,

condenser subcooling

ΔW̅t,

average energy saving per year for 20% of installed air-conditioners with different capacities yr)/yr)

ΔW\( {t}_i \),

energy saving per year for air-conditioner with cooling capacity i yr)/yr)

ΔẆ\( {t}_i \),

power saving for air-conditioner with cooling capacity i (kW)

ρ,

density (kg/m3)

ωa,

specific humidity of air, kg/kg of dry air

A,

area (m2)

COP,

coefficient of performance

cos φ,

power factor

DBT,

dry bulb temperature (°C)

EER,

energy Efficiency Ratio

h,

kJ/kg

hai,

enthalpy of air entering the indoor side, kJ/kg of dry air

hao,

enthalpy of air leaving the indoor side, kJ/kg of dry air

It,

total current

m,

refrigerant mass charge (m)

P,

pressure (bar)

tc,

total cooling capacity

T,

temperature (°C)

Tamb,

ambient air temperature

V,

velocity (m/s)

a,

Indoor air-flow rate, m3/s

va,

specific volume of air at point of measurement of air-water vapour mixture, m3/kg

Vt,

total voltage

WBT,

wet bulb temperature (°C)

t,

total input power

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Iran Energy Efficiency Organization (IEEO-SABA) for providing air-conditioning laboratory services and their technical and financial support during this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Colasson S, Mercier P, Lebouché M (2001) Effect of the R-407C charge on the behaviour of a liquid chiller with plate heat exchangers. In: Commissions B1, B2 with E1, E2. IIF–IIR, Dubrvnik, Croatie, 11 pp (confe’rence RQO-18)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Primal F et al (2002) The behaviour of small capacity (5 kW) heat pump with micro-channelled flat tube heat exchangers. In: Zero Leakage – Minimum Charge. CZ9, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 179–186Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grace IN, Datta D, Tassou SA (2005) Sensitivity of refrigeration system performance to charge levels and parameters for on-line leak detection. Appl Therm Eng 25(4):557–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu H, Chen J, Chen Z (2005) Impact of CO 2 mass charge on transcritical automotive air conditioning system. Huagong Xuebao/J Chem Indust Eng (China) 56(8):1426–1432Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cho H et al (2005) Effects of refrigerant charge amount on the performance of a transcritical CO 2 heat pump. Int J Refrig 28(8):1266–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goswani DY (2001) Effect of refrigerant charge on the performance of air conditioning systems. Int J Energy Res 25:741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poggi F, Macchi-Tejeda H, Leducq D, Bontemps A (2008) Refrigerant charge in refrigerating systems and strategies of charge reduction. Int J Refrig 31:353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boeng J, Melo (2014) Mapping the energy consumption of household refrigerators by varying the refrigerant charge and the expansion restriction. Int J Refrig 41:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarntichartsak P, Monyakul V, Thepa S (2007) Modeling and experimental study on performance of inverter air conditioner with variation of capillary tube using R-22 and R-407. Energy Convers Manag 48:344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vjacheslav N, Rozhentsev A (2001) Rationality based model for evaluating the optimal refrigerant mass charge in refrigerating machines. Energy Convers Manag 42:2083–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Padalkar AS, Mali KV, Devotta S (2014) Simulated and experimental performance of spiftlt packaged air conditioner using refrigerant Hc-290 as a subsitute for HCFC-22. Appl Therm Eng 62:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xuan XC (2003) Optimum staging of multistage exo-reversible refrigeration systems. Cryogenics 43:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rebora A, Senarega M, Tagliafico LA (2006) Influence of some design parameters on the thermal performance of domestic refrigerator appliances. Heat Mass Transf 42:803–811.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-005-0053-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rais S, Kadono Y, Katsunori M, Kazuya M, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T (2017) Modelling and simulation of air-conditioning cycles. Heat Mass Transf 53:425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1826-1
  15. 15.
    Monirimanesh N, Mostafa Nowee S, Khayyami S, Abrishamchi I (2016) Performance enhancement of an experimental air conditioning system by using TiO 2 /methanol nanofluid in heat pipe heat exchangers. Heat Mass Transf.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1615-2
  16. 16.
    Arzu Şencan Şahin, Bayram Kiliç¸, Ulaş Kiliç¸ Optimization of heat pump using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm, Heat Mass Transfer (2011) 47:1553–1560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-011-0818-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salimpour MR, Bahrami Z (2011) Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of air-cooled heat exchangers. Heat Mass Transfer 47:35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-010-0672-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wen M-Y, Ho C-Y, Jang K-J, Yeh C-H Experimental study on the evaporative cooling of an air-cooled condenser with humidifying air. Heat Mass Transf.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-013-1243-7
  19. 19.
    Ghanei A, Assareh E, Biglari M, Ghanbarzadeh A, Noghrehabadi AR Thermal-economic multi-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger using particle swarm optimization (PSO). Heat Mass Transf.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1340-2
  20. 20.
    Yu FW, Chan KT (2007) Modelling of a condenser-fan control for an air-cooled centrifugal chiller. Appl Energy 84:1117–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu FW, Chan KT (2004) Condensing temperature control to enhance the efficiency of air-cooled chillers. Building Serv Eng Res Technol 25(4):279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hajidavalloo E, Eghtedari H (2010) Performance improvement of air-cooled refrigeration system by using evaporatively cooled air condenser. Int J Refrig 33:982–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang C-L (2004) Intensive parameter analysis of adiabatic capillary tube using approximate analytic solution. Int J Refrig 27:456–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang L, Wang W (2008) A generalized correlation for the characteristics of adiabatic capillary tubes. Int J Refrig 31:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Choi J, Kim Y, Chung JT (2004) An empirical correlation and rating charts for the performance of adiabatic capillary tubes with alternative refrigerants. Appl Thermal Eng 24:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Son C-H, Hoo-Kyu O (2012) Condensation pressure drop of R22, R134a and R410A in a single circular microtube. Heat Mass Transf 48:1437–1450.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-012-0990-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Son C-H, Lee H-S (2009) Condensation heat transfer characteristics of R-22, R-134a and R-410A in small diameter tubes. Heat Mass Transf 45:1153–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-009-0489-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nilpueng K, Supavarasuwat C, Wongwises S (2011) Performance characteristics of HFC-134a and HFC-410A refrigeration system using a short-tube orifice as an expansion device. Heat Mass Transf 47:1219–1227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-011-0783-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oruc V, Devecioglu AG (2015) Thermodynamic performance of air conditioners working with R417A and R424A as alternatives to R22. Int J Refrig 55:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Björk E, Palm B (2006) Performance of a domestic refrigerator under influence of varied expansion device capacity, refrigerant charge and ambient temperature. Int J Refrig 29:789–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim W, Braun JE (2010) Impacts of refrigerant charge on air conditioner and heat pump performance. International refrigeration and air conditioning conference at purdue, July 10–15Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Torella E, Cabello R, Sanchez D, Larumbe JA, Llopis R (2010) On-site study of HCFC-22 substitution for HFC non-azeotropic blends (R417A, R422D) on a water chiller of a centralized HVAC system. Energy Build 42:1561e1566Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aprea C, Maiorino A, Mastrullo R (2012) Exergy analysis of a cooling system: experimental investigation on the consequences of the retrofit of R22 with R422D. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 9:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang F, Shen SQ, Li DY Evaluation on environment-friendly refrigerants with similar normal boiling points in ejector refrigeration system. Heat Mass Transf.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1468-0
  35. 35.
    Dalkilic AS, Mahian O, Wongwises S (2014) Selection of the most suitable refrigerant for a shell and tube condenser. Heat Mass Transf 50:183–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-013-1235-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Iran Energy Efficiency Organization (IEEO-SABA). Ministry of energy, Tehran, Iran. http://en.saba.org.ir/en/home
  37. 37.
    ASHRAE (2009) ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 37–2009, methods of testing for rating electrically driven unitary air-conditioning and heat pump equipment. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Klein SA (2002) Engineering equation solver (EES) for microsoft windows operating system: commercial and professional versions. F-Chart Software. Available on the Web at, Madison http://www.fchart.com Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringHakim Sabzevari UniversitySabzevarIran
  2. 2.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityRashtIran
  3. 3.Iran Energy Efficiency Organization (IEEO-SABA)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations