Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Numerical study of radiative heat transfer and effects of thermal boundary conditions on CLC fuel reactor

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global warming has become a worldwide concern due to its severe impacts and consequences on the climate system and ecosystem. As a promising technology proving good carbon capture ability with low-efficiency penalty, Chemical Looping Combustion technology has risen much interest. However, the radiative heat transfer was hardly studied, nor its effects were clearly declared. The present work provides a mathematical model for radiative heat transfer within fuel reactor of chemical looping combustion systems and conducts a numerical research on the effects of boundary conditions, solid particles reflectivity, particles size, and the operating temperature. The results indicate that radiative heat transfer has very limited impacts on the flow pattern. Meanwhile, the temperature variations in the static bed region (where solid particles are dense) brought by radiation are also insignificant. However, the effects of radiation on temperature profiles within free bed region (where solid particles are very sparse) are obvious, especially when convective-radiative (mixed) boundary condition is applied on fuel reactor walls. Smaller oxygen carrier particle size results in larger absorption & scattering coefficients. The consideration of radiative heat transfer within fuel reactor increases the temperature gradient within free bed region. On the other hand, the conversion performance of fuel is nearly not affected by radiation heat transfer within fuel reactor. However, the consideration of radiative heat transfer enhances the heat transfer between the gas phase and solid phase, especially when the operating temperature is low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson TR, Hawkins E, Jones PD (2016) CO2, the greenhouse effect and global warming: from the pioneering work of Arrhenius and Callendar to today’s earth system models. Endeavour 40:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pachauri RK, Meyer L, van Ypersele J-P, Brinkman S, van Kesteren L, Leprince-Ringuet N, van Boxmeer F (2014) Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Intergovernmental panel on climate change

  3. W. G. I. of the I. P. on C. Change (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental panel on climate change

  4. Richter HJ, Knoche KF (1983) Reversibility of combustion processes. ACS Symp Ser 235:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adánez A, García-Labiano J, de Diego F, Plata LF, Celaya A, Gayán J, Abad P (2003) Optimizing the fuel reactor for chemical-looping combustion. Int Conf Fluid Bed Combustion 17:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng Z, Xiao R, Jin B, Song Q (2009) Numerical simulation of chemical looping combustion process with CaSO4 oxygen carrier. Int J Greenh Gas Control 4:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harichandan AB, Shamim T (2014) CFD analysis of bubble hydrodynamics in a fuel reactor for a hydrogen-fueled chemical looping combustion system. Energy Convers Manag 86:1010–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Porrazzo R, White G, Ocone R (2016) Fuel reactor modelling for chemical looping combustion: from micro-scale to macro-scale. Fuel 175:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2013) Fuel reactor modelling in chemical-looping combustion of coal: 1. Model formulation. Chem Eng Sci 87:277–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Labiano F, de Diego LF, Gayán P, Abad A, Adánez J (2013) Fuel reactor modelling in chemical-looping combustion of coal: 2-simulation and optimization. Chem Eng Sci 87:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abad A, Adánez J, de Diego LF, Gayán P, García-Labiano F, Lyngfelt A (2013) Fuel reactor model validation: assessment of the key parameters affecting the chemical-looping combustion of coal. Int J Greenh Gas Control 19:541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen L, Bao J, Kong L, Combs M, Nikolic HS, Fan Z, Liu K (2016) The direct solid-solid reaction between coal char and iron-based oxygen carrier and its contribution to solid-fueled chemical looping combustion. Appl Energy 184:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zafar Q, Abad A, Mattisson T, Gevert B, Strand M (2007) Reduction and oxidation kinetics of Mn3O4/mg-ZrO2 oxygen carrier particles for chemical-looping combustion. Chem Eng Sci 62:6556–6567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kruggel-Emden H, Rickelt S, Stepanek F, Munjiza A (2010) Development and testing of an interconnected multiphase CFD-model for chemical looping combustion. Chem Eng Sci 65(16):4732–4745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang N, Lu B, Wang W, Li J (2008) Virtual experimentation through 3D full-loop simulation of a circulating fluidized bed. Particuology 6:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker JM (2014) CFD model for the simulation of chemical looping combustion. Powder Technol 265:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abad A, Adánez J, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Sprachmann G (2015) Conceptual design of a 100MWth CLC unit for solid fuel combustion. Appl Energy 157:462–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang J, Ma L, Tang J, Liu H, Zhu B, Lian Y, Cui X (2017) Chemical thermodynamics analysis for in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion of lignite with phosphogypsum for syngas. Appl Therm Eng 112:516–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mendiara T, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Gayán P, Abad A, Adánez J (2013) Behaviour of a bauxite waste material as oxygen carrier in a 500Wth CLC unit with coal. Int J Greenh Gas Control 17:170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Linderholm C, Schmitz M (2016) Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels in a 100 kW dual circulating fluidized bed system using iron ore as oxygen carrier. J Environ Chem Eng 4:1029–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajendran S, Wong M, Stokie D, Bhattacharya S (2016) Performance of a Victorian brown coal and iron ore during chemical looping combustion in a 10 kWth alternating fluidized bed. Fuel 183:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huijun G, Laihong S, Fei F, Shouxi J (2015) Experiments on biomass gasification using chemical looping with nickel-based oxygen carrier in a 25 kWth reactor. Appl Therm Eng 85:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bordbar MH, Myöhänen K, Hyppänen T (2015) Coupling of a radiative heat transfer model and a three-dimensional combustion model for a circulating fluidized bed furnace. Appl Therm Eng 76:344–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh RI, Brink A, Hupa M (2013) CFD modeling to study fluidized bed combustion and gasification. Appl Therm Eng 52:585–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Syamlal M, O’Brien TJ (1989) Computer simulation of bubbles in a fluidized bed. AIChE Symp Ser 85:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wen C, Yu YH (2014) Mechanics of fluidization. Int Chem Eng Prog Symp Ser 62:100

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gidaspow D, Bezburuah R, Ding J (1991) Hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized beds: kinetic theory approach. Hemisphere, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gunn DJ (1978) Transfer of heat or mass to particles in fixed and fluidised beds. Int J Heat Mass Transf 21:467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patil DJ, van Sint Annaland M, Kuipers JAM (2005) Critical comparison of hydrodynamic models for gas--solid fluidized beds—Part I: bubbling gas--solid fluidized beds operated with a jet. Chem Eng Sci 60:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lun CKK, Savage SB, Jeffrey DJ, Chepurniy N (1984) Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield. J Fluid Mech 140:223–256

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Ogawa S, Umemura A, Oshima N (1980) On the equations of fully fluidized granular materials. J Appl Math Phys (ZAMP) 31:483–493

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Schaeffer DG (1987) Instability in the evolution equations describing incompressible granular flow. J Differ Equ 66:19–50

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Ding J, Gidaspow D (1990) A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow. AICHE J 36:523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaviany M (1991) Principles of heat transfer in porous media. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Siegel R, Howell JR (1981) Thermal radiation heat transfer. Hemisphere Pub. Corp, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hottel HC, Sarofim AF (1967) Radiative transfer. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smith TF, Shen ZF, Friedman JN (1982) Evaluation of coefficients for the weighted sum of gray gases model. J Heat Transf 104:602–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Coppalle A, Vervisch P (1983) The total emissivities of high-temperature flames. Combust Flame 49:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Denison MK, Webb BW (1993) A spectral line-based weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model for arbitrary RTE solvers. J Heat Transf 115:1004–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Edwards DK, Matavosian R (1984) Scaling rules for total absorptivity and emissivity of gases. J Heat Transf 106:684–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sedor KE, Hossain MM, de Lasa HI (2008) Reduction kinetics of a fluidizable nickel-alumina oxygen carrier for chemical-looping combustion. Can J Chem Eng 86:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim B, Sohn H (2002) Cyclic reaction system involving CaS and CaSO4 for converting sulfur dioxide to elemental sulfur without generating secondary pollutants. 3. Kinetics of the hydrogen. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:3092–3096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gupta SK, Agarwal VK, Singh SN, Seshadri V, Mills D, Singh J, Prakash C (2009) Prediction of minimum fluidization velocity for fine tailings materials. Powder Technol 196:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pattipati RR, Wen CY (1981) Minimum fluidization velocity at high temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 20:705–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao Z, Iloeje CO, Chen T, Ghoniem AF (2014) Design of a rotary reactor for chemical-looping combustion. Part 1: fundamentals and design methodology. Fuel 121:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao Z, Ghoniem AF (2014) Design of a rotary reactor for chemical-looping combustion. Part 2: comparison of copper-, nickel-, and iron-based oxygen carriers. Fuel 121:344–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the support received from King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) and SABIC for funding this work through Project No. FT161013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Habib.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben-Mansour, R., Li, H., Habib, M.A. et al. Numerical study of radiative heat transfer and effects of thermal boundary conditions on CLC fuel reactor. Heat Mass Transfer 54, 571–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2139-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2139-8

Navigation