Skip to main content
Log in

Mass transfer parameters of celeriac during vacuum drying

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An accurate prediction of moisture transfer parameters is very important for efficient mass transfer analysis, accurate modelling of drying process, and better designing of new dryers and optimization of existing drying process. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of temperature (e.g., 55, 65 and 75 °C) and chamber pressure (e.g., 0.1, 3, 7, 10, 13 and 17 kPa) on effective diffusivity and convective mass transfer coefficient of celeriac slices during vacuum drying. The obtained Biot number indicated that the moisture transfer in the celeriac slices was controlled by both internal and external resistance. The effective diffusivity obtained to be in the ranges of 7.5231 × 10−10–3.8015 × 10−9 m2 s−1. The results showed that the diffusivity increased with increasing temperature and decreasing pressure. The mass transfer coefficient values varied from 4.6789 × 10−7 to 1.0059 × 10−6 m s−1, and any increment in drying temperature and pressure caused an increment in the coefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Bi :

Biot number (–)

D :

Effective moisture diffusivity (m2 s−1)

G :

Lag factor (–)

k :

Moisture transfer coefficient (m s−1)

L :

Thickness of samples (m)

M :

Instantaneous moisture content (gwater/gdry matter)

M e :

Equilibrium moisture content (gwater/gdry matter)

M 0 :

Initial moisture content (gwater/gdry matter)

M s :

Moisture content at surface of sample (gwater/gdry matter)

MR :

Moisture ratio (–)

S :

Drying coefficient (s−1)

t :

Drying time (s)

µ 1 :

The first root of the transcendental characteristic equation (–)

References

  1. Beigi M (2015) Influence of drying air parameters on mass transfer characteristics of apple slices. Heat Mass Transf. doi:10.1007/s00231-015-1646-8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mujumdar SA (2014) Hand book of industrial drying, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu L, Orikasa T, Ogawa Y, Tagawa A (2007) Vacuum drying characteristics of eggplants. J Food Eng 83:422–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bazyma LA, Guskov VP, Basteev AV, Lyashenko AM, Lyakhno V, Kutuvoy VA (2006) The investigation of low temperature vacuum drying processes of agricultural materials. J Food Eng 74:410–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jena S, Das H (2007) Modelling for vacuum drying characteristics of coconut presscake. J Food Eng 79:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alibas I (2012) Determination of vacuum and air drying characteristics of celeriac slices. J Biol Environ Sci 6:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zakipour E, Hamidi Z (2011) Vacuum drying characteristics of some vegetables. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 30:97–105

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mrkic V, Ukrainczyk M, Tripalo B (2007) Applicability of moisture transfer BiDi correlation for convective drying of broccoli. J Food Eng 79:640–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim D, Son G, Kim S (2016) Numerical analysis of convective drying of a moist object with combined internal and external heat and mass transfer. J Mech Sci Technol 30:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saravacos GS, Maroulis ZB (2001) Transport properties of food. Marcel Dekker Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tiwari GN, Kumar S, Prakash O (2004) Evaluation of convective mass transfer coefficient during drying of jiggery. J Food Eng 63:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Babalis SJ, Belessiotis VG (2004) Influence of the drying conditions on the drying constants and moisture diffusivity during the thin-layer drying of figs. J Food Eng 65:449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dak M, Pareek NK (2014) Effective moisture diffusivity of pomegranate arils undergoing microwave-vacuum drying. J Food Eng 122:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torki-Harchegani M, Ghanbarian D, Sadeghi M (2015) Estimation of whole lemon mass transfer parameters during hot air drying using different modelling methods. Heat Mass Transf 51:1121–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dincer I, Dost S (1995) An analytical model for moisture diffusion in solid objects during drying. Dry Technol 13:425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dincer I, Dost S (1996) A modelling study for moisture diffusivities and moisture transfer coefficients in drying of solid objects. Int J Energy Res 20:531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mwithiga G, Olwal JO (2005) The drying kinetics of kale (Brassica oleracea) in a convective hot air dryer. J Food Eng 71:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Evin D (2012) Thin layer drying kinetics of Gundelia tournefortii L. Food Bioprod Process 90:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akhondi E, Kazemi A, Maghsoodi V (2011) Determination of a suitable thin layer drying curve model for saffron (Crocus sativus L) stigmas in an infrared dryer. Sci Iran 18:1397–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaya A, Aydin O, Dincer I (2010) Comparison of experimental data with results of some drying models for regularly shaped products. Heat Mass Transf 46:555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaya A, Aydin O, Demirtas C (2007) Drying kinetics of red delicious apple. Biosyst Eng 96:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Celma AR, Rojas S, Lopez-Rodríguez F (2008) Mathematical modeling of thin-layer infrared drying of wet olive husk. Chem Eng Process 47:1810–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Evin D (2011) Microwave drying and moisture diffusivity of white mulberry: experimental and mathematical modeling. J Mech Sci Technol 25:2711–2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mortezapour H, Ghobadian B, Khoshtaghaza MH, Minaei S (2014) Drying kinetics and quality characteristics of saffron dried with a heat pump assisted hybrid photovoltaic-thermal solar dryer. J Agric Sci Technol 16:33–45

    Google Scholar 

  25. Péré C, Rodier E (2002) Microwave vacuum drying of porous media: experimental study and qualitative considerations of internal transfers. Chem Eng Process 41:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Methakhup S, Chiewchan N, Devahastin S (2005) Effects of drying methods and conditions on drying kinetics and quality of Indian gooseberry flake. LWT Food Sci Technol 38:579–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dincer I (1998) Moisture transfer analysis during drying of slab woods. Heat Mass Transf 34:317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sadeghi M, Mirzabeigi Kesbi O, Mireei SA (2013) Mass transfer characteristics during convective, microwave and combined microwave-convective drying of lemon slices. J Sci Food Agric 93:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maskan A, Kaya S, Makan M (2002) Hot air and sun drying of grape leather (pestil). J Food Eng 54:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duc LA, Han JW, Keum DH (2011) Thin layer drying characteristics of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). J Stored Prod Res 47:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Doymaz I, Ismail O (2011) Drying characteristics of sweet cherry. Food Bioprod Process 89:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Akpinar EK (2008) Mathematical modelling and experimental investigation on sun and solar drying of white mulberry. J Mech Sci Technol 22:1544–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Torki-Harchegani M, Ghanbarian D, Ghasemi Pirbalouti A, Sadeghi M (2016) Dehydration behaviour, mathematical modelling, energy efficiency and essential oil yield of peppermint leaves undergoing microwave and hot air treatments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Drouzas AE, Tsami E, Saravacos GD (1999) Microwave/vacuum drying of model fruit gel. J Food Eng 39:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Arévalo-Pinedo A, Murr FEX (2006) Kinetics of vacuum drying of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima): modeling with shrinkage. J Food Eng 76:562–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu X, Hou H, Chen J (2013) Applicability of moisture transfer parameters estimated by correlation between Biot number and lag factor (Bi–G correlation) for convective drying of eggplant slices. Heat Mass Transf 49:1595–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Beigi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beigi, M. Mass transfer parameters of celeriac during vacuum drying. Heat Mass Transfer 53, 1327–1334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1912-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1912-4

Keywords

Navigation