Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical heat and mass transfer analysis of a cross-flow indirect evaporative cooler with plates and flat tubes

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study the performance of an indirect evaporative cooling system (IECS) of cross-flow configuration is numerically investigated. Considering the variation of water film temperature along the flowing path and the wettability of the wet channel, a two-dimensional theoretical model is developed to comprehensively describe the heat and mass transfer process involved in the system. After comparing the simulation results with available experimental data from literature, the deviation within ±5 % proves the accuracy and reliability of the proposed mathematical model. The simulation results of the plate type IECS indicate that the important parameters, such as dimension of plates, air properties, and surface wettability play a great effect on the cooling performance. The investigation of flow pattern shows that cross-flow configuration of primary air with counter-flow of secondary air and water film has a better cooling performance than that of the parallel-flow pattern. Furthermore, the performance of a novel flat tube working as the separating medium is numerically investigated. Simulation results for this novel geometry indicate that the tube number, tube long axis and short axis length as well as tube length remarkably affect its cooling performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Tube long axis length (m)

b :

Tube short axis length (m)

c p :

Specific heat capacity at constant pressure (J/kg K)

dx :

Dimension of control element along x-axis (m)

dy :

Dimension of control element along y-axis (m)

D dh :

Degree of humidity (g/kg)

D eq :

Equivalent diameter (m)

f :

Friction factor

h :

Convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

h d :

Convective mass transfer coefficient (kg/m2 s)

g :

Acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)

i :

Specific enthalpy (J/kg)

i o :

Specific enthalpy of vapor at 0 °C (J/kg)

k:

Thermal conductivity (W/m2 K)

L x :

System length (m)

L y :

System height (m)

Le:

Lewis factor

m :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

N :

Number of plates or tubes

N t :

Number of tubes in one column

N l :

Number of tubes in one row

Nu :

Nusselt number

Pr :

Prandtl number

ΔP :

Pressure drop (Pa)

Q :

Heat transfer rate (W)

Re :

Reynolds number

r :

Relative pitch

S :

Tube spacing (m)

T :

Temperature (°C)

U :

Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

ν :

Velocity (m/s)

z :

Channel width (m)

ρ :

Density (kg/m3)

δ :

Thickness (m)

σ :

Surface wetting factor

μ :

Dynamic viscosity [kg/(m s)]

ε :

Efficiency

Γ:

Water linear flow rate [kg/(m s)]

ω :

Humidity ratio (g/kg dry air)

ϕ :

Relative humidity

a :

Dry air

c :

Calculated results

e :

Experimental data

i :

Inlet

int :

Water and secondary air interface

l :

Longitudinal

lam :

Laminar flow

o :

Outlet

p :

Primary air

ps :

Primary air to secondary air

pw :

Primary air to water

s :

Secondary air

se :

Sensible

la :

Latent heat

m :

Moist air

sat :

Saturated/saturation

t :

Transversal

tur :

Turbulent flow

ν :

Vapor

w :

Water film

wb :

Wet bulb

x :

x axis direction

y :

y axis direction

References

  1. Duan Z, Zhan C, Zhang X, Mustafa M, Zhao X, Alimohammadisagvand B et al (2012) Indirect evaporative cooling: past, present and future potentials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:6823–6850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chua KJ, Chou SK, Yang WM, Yan J (2013) Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning—a review of technologies and strategies. Appl Energy 104:87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maclaine-Cross IL, Banks PJ (1981) A general theory of wet surface heat exchangers and its application to regenerative evaporative cooling. J Heat Transf 103:579–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kettleborough CF, Hsieh CS (1983) The thermal performance of the wet surface plastic plate heat exchanger used as an indirect evaporative cooler. J Heat Transf 105:366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erens P, Dreyer A (1993) Modelling of indirect evaporative air coolers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 36:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halasz B (1998) A general mathematical model of evaporative cooling devices. Revue Générale de Thermique 37:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsay Y (1994) Analysis of heat and mass transfer in a countercurrent-flow wet surface heat exchanger. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 15:149–159

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasan A (2012) Going below the wet-bulb temperature by indirect evaporative cooling: analysis using a modified ε-NTU method. Appl Energy 89:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ren C, Yang H (2006) An analytical model for the heat and mass transfer processes in indirect evaporative cooling with parallel/counter flow configurations. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49:617–627

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu S, Lavan Z, Worek W (1989) Optimization of wet-surface heat exchangers. Energy 14:757–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao X, Li JM, Riffat SB (2008) Numerical study of a novel counter-flow heat and mass exchanger for dew point evaporative cooling. Appl Therm Eng 28:1942–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Riangvilaikul B, Kumar S (2010) Numerical study of a novel dew point evaporative cooling system. Energy Build 42:2241–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao X, Liu S, Riffat SB (2008) Comparative study of heat and mass exchanging materials for indirect evaporative cooling systems. Build Environ 43:1902–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoitchkov NJ, Dimitrov GI (1998) Effectiveness of crossflow plate heat exchanger for indirect evaporative cooling. Int J Refrig 21:463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qureshi BA, Zubair SM (2007) Prediction of evaporation losses in evaporative fluid coolers. Appl Therm Eng 27:520–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim NH, Lee EJ, Byun HW (2013) Condensation heat transfer and pressure drop in flattened smooth tubes having different aspect ratios. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 46:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim N-H, Lee E-J, Byun H-W (2013) Evaporation heat transfer and pressure drop of R-410A in flattened smooth tubes having different aspect ratios. Int J Refrig 36:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tovaras NV, Bykov AV, Gogolin VA (1984) Heat exchange at film water flow under operating conditions of evaporative condenser. Holod Teh 1:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cengel Y, Boles M, Kanoğlu M (2011) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim T (2013) Effect of longitudinal pitch on convective heat transfer in crossflow over in-line tube banks. Ann Nucl Energy 57:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaddis ES, Gnielinski V (1985) Pressure drop in cross flow across tube bundles. Int Chem Eng (United States) 25:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gómez EV, González AT, Martínez FR (2012) Experimental characterisation of an indirect evaporative cooling prototype in two operating modes. Appl Energy 97:340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tejero-González A, Andrés-Chicote M, Velasco-Gómez E, Rey-Martínez FJ (2013) Influence of constructive parameters on the performance of two indirect evaporative cooler prototypes. Appl Therm Eng 51:1017–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barzegar M, Layeghi M, Ebrahimi G, Hamzeh Y, Khorasani M (2012) Experimental evaluation of the performances of cellulosic pads made out of Kraft and NSSC corrugated papers as evaporative media. Energy Convers Manag 54:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai YJ, Sumathy K (2002) Theoretical study on a cross-flow direct evaporative cooler using honeycomb paper as packing material. Appl Therm Eng 22:1417–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the kind support of National Research Foundation CRP Programme NRF2011NRF_CRP003_003 funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. J. Chua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chua, K.J., Xu, J., Cui, X. et al. Numerical heat and mass transfer analysis of a cross-flow indirect evaporative cooler with plates and flat tubes. Heat Mass Transfer 52, 1765–1777 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1696-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1696-y

Keywords

Navigation