Heat and Mass Transfer

, Volume 52, Issue 7, pp 1283–1293 | Cite as

Validation of a heat conduction model for finite domain, non-uniformly heated, laminate bodies

  • Louis Desgrosseilliers
  • Moe Kabbara
  • Dominic Groulx
  • Mary Anne White
Original

Abstract

Infrared thermographic validation is shown for a closed-form analytical heat conduction model for non-uniformly heated, laminate bodies with an insulated domain boundary. Experiments were conducted by applying power to rectangular electric heaters and cooled by natural convection in air, but also apply to constant-temperature heat sources and forced convection. The model accurately represents two-dimensional laminate heat conduction behaviour giving rise to heat spreading using one-dimensional equations for the temperature distributions and heat transfer rates under steady-state and pseudo-steady-state conditions. Validation of the model with an insulated boundary (complementing previous studies with an infinite boundary) provides useful predictions of heat spreading performance and simplified temperature uniformity calculations (useful in log-mean temperature difference style heat exchanger calculations) for real laminate systems such as found in electronics heat sinks, multi-ply stovetop cookware and interface materials for supercooled salt hydrates. Computational determinations of implicit insulated boundary condition locations in measured data, required to assess model equation validation, were also demonstrated. Excellent goodness of fit was observed (both root-mean-square error and R2 values), in all cases except when the uncertainty of low temperatures measured via infrared thermography hindered the statistical significance of the model fit. The experimental validation in all other cases supports use of the model equations in design calculations and heat exchange simulations.

List of symbols

Dimensional variables

d

Fin region insulated boundary condition location (m)

d*

Estimated fin region insulated boundary condition location (m)

h

Convection heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

h1

Left-profile heated region convection heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

h2

Left-profile fin region convection heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

\(h_{1}^{'}\)

Right-profile heated region convection heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

\(h_{2}^{'}\)

Right-profile fin region convection heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

k

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

L

Heated region length (m)

L1

Left-profile heated region length (m)

L2

Right-profile heated region length (m)

LMTD

Log-mean temperature difference (K)

\(Q_{fin}^{'}\)

Linear heat flux entering the fin region (W m−1)

\(q_{0}^{{\prime \prime }}\)

Applied finite heat flux (W m−2)

R

Thermal resistance above the highly conductive metal core (m2 K W−1)

RMS

Root-mean-square error

R2

Quality of fit regression parameter

t

Layer thickness (m)

T

Temperature of the highly conductive metal core (K)

Ti

Applied temperature heat source (K)

Tinf

Free stream temperature (K)

To

Boundary temperature at x = L (K)

x

Axial position (m)

z

Vertical axis position (m)

Greek symbols

α

Heated region constant (m−1)

β

Heated region particular solution (K)

∆T

Temperature uncertainty 95 % confidence limit (K)

γ

Fin region constant (m−1)

σ

Standard deviation

Subscripts

1

High conductivity metal core

2

Top thermally resistive layer

3

Bottom thermally resistive layer

f

Fin region only

h

Heated region only

meas

Based on measurement data

model

Based on two-region fin model results

References

  1. 1.
    Desgrosseilliers L (2012) Heat transfer enhancement using laminate film encapsulation for phase change heat storage materials. Mech Eng Dalhousie University, Halifax, p 101Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Desgrosseilliers L, Groulx D, White MA (2014) Thermographic validation of a novel, laminate body, analytical heat conduction model. Heat Mass Transf 50:895–905. doi:10.1007/s00231-014-1295-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Desgrosseilliers L, Groulx D, White MA (2013) Heat conduction in laminate multilayer bodies with applied finite heat source. Int J Therm Sci 72:47–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Desgrosseilliers L, Groulx D, White MA (2014) Two-region fin model adjacent temperature profile interactions. 15th Internation Heat Transfer Conference Begel House, KyotoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groll WA (2005) Bonded metal components having uniform thermal conductivity characteristics and method of making same. All-Clad Metalcrafters LLC, USGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Groll WA (2001) Method for making a copper core five-ply composite for cookware Clad Metals LLC, USGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Woolf L (1985) Graphite composite cookware. G.A. Technologies Inc., USGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kraus AD, Aziz A, Welty J (2001) Multidimensional Heat Transfer in Fins and Fin Assemblies. Extended Surface Heat Transfer, Wiley, pp 699-753Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mark JE (2009) Polymer data handbook, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith EH (1998) Mechanical engineer’s reference book, 12th edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green DW, Perry RH (2008) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    (2012) PDS Targray aluminum laminate pouch rev 3. In: Targray (ed), Kirkland, QC, CAN. http://www.targray.com/documents/pds-targray-aluminum-laminate-pouch.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Desgrosseilliers
    • 1
    • 3
  • Moe Kabbara
    • 1
    • 3
  • Dominic Groulx
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mary Anne White
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  3. 3.Institute for Research in MaterialsDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations