Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of attack and cone angels on air flow characteristics for staggered wing shaped tubes bundle

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental and numerical study has been conducted to clarify fluid flow characteristics and pressure drop distributions of a cross-flow heat exchanger employing staggered wing-shaped tubes at different angels of attack. The water-side Rew and the air-side Rea were at 5 × 102 and at from 1.8 × 103 to 9.7 × 103, respectively. Three cases of the tubes arrangements with various angles of attack, row angles of attack and 90° cone angles were employed at the considered Rea range. Correlation of pressure drop coefficient Pdc in terms of Rea, design parameters for the studied cases were presented. The flow pattern around the staggered wing-shaped tubes bundle were predicted using the commercial CFD FLUENT 6.3.26 software package. Results indicated that the values of Pdc increased with the angle of attack from 0° to 45°, while the opposite was true for angles of attack from 135° to 180°. The values of Pdc for the arrangements of (θ1,2,3 = 45°), (θ1 = 45°, θ2 = 0°, θ3 = 45°), and (θ1,2,3 = 0°) were lower than those for the arrangement of (ϕ1 = ϕ2 = ϕ3 = 90°) by about 33, 53, and 91 %, respectively. Comparisons between the experimental and numerical results of the present study and those obtained by similar previous studies showed good agreements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Deq :

Equivalent circular diameter, m

Pdc :

Pressure drop coefficient, (2 ∆Pa)/(ρaf V 2a )

Pr:

Prandtl number, (μ cp)/k

R2 :

Coefficient of determination ranged from 0 to 1

Re:

Reynolds number, (ρ V Deq)/μ

T:

Temperature, K

V:

Velocity, m/s

m:

Mass flow rate, kg/s

t:

Tube thickness, m

x:

Axial coordinate

y:

The normal distance to the tube surface

y+ :

Dimensionless normal distance to the tube surface

μ:

Absolute viscosity, Pa s

ρ:

Density, kg/m3

θ:

Angle of attack, °

θi :

Row angle of attack, °

ϕi :

The cone angle, °

∆hdyn :

Dynamic head difference, m H2O

∆Pa :

Pressure drop across the bundle, Pa

a:

Air

c:

Circular

e:

Exit

f:

Film

i:

Inlet, or row number

o:

Outer or outlet

w:

Water

RNG:

Reynolds normalized group

References

  1. Zhukauskas A, Ulinskas RV (1985) Efficiency parameters of heat transfer in tube banks. Heat Transf Eng 6(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brauer H (1964) Compact heat exchangers. J. Chem. Process Eng, pp. 451–460

  3. Horvat A, Leskovar M, Mavko B (2006) Comparison of heat transfer conditions in tube bundle cross-flow for different tube shapes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49:1027–1038

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishiyama H, Ota T, Matsuno T (1988) Heat transfer and flow around elliptic cylinders in tandem arrangement. JASME Int J Ser II 31(3):410–419

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harris DK, Goldschmidt VW (2002) Measurement of the overall heat transfer for combustion gases confined within elliptical tube heat exchangers. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 26:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ibrahim TA, Gomma A (2009) Thermal performance criteria of elliptic tube bundle in cross flow. Int J Therm Sci 48:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ibrahiem EZ, Elsyed AO, Sayed Ahmed SE (2003) Experimental investigation of the performance of a cross flow heat exchanger with bundle of semi-circular tubes. Mansoura Eng J 28(2):134–150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sayed Ahmed SE, Mesalhy OM, Khass TM, Hassan AH (2012) Parametric study of air cooling process via water cooled bundle of wing-shaped tubes. EIJST 15(3):1172–1184

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cengel YA (1998) Heat transfer a practical approach. McGraw-Hill, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  10. (2006) FLUENT 6.3 User’s guide. FLUENT Inc

  11. Yakhot V, Orszag SA, Thangam S, Gatski TB, Speziale GG (1992) Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Phys Fluids A 4:1510–1520

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zehua H, Sun D (2000) Predicting local surface heat transfer coefficients by different turbulent k-ε models to simulate heat and moisture transfer during air-blast chilling. Int J Refrig 24(7):702–717

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zukauskas A (1972) Heat transfer from tubes in cross flow. In: Hartnett JP, Irvine TF Jr (eds) Advances in heat transfer, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 93–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Abdelatief.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayed Ahmed, S.E., Ibrahiem, E.Z., Mesalhy, O.M. et al. Effect of attack and cone angels on air flow characteristics for staggered wing shaped tubes bundle. Heat Mass Transfer 51, 1001–1016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1473-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1473-3

Keywords

Navigation