Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficient synthesis of large-scale heat exchanger networks using monogenetic algorithm

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A promising method for the efficient design of large-scale heat exchanger networks is the genetic algorithm. The heat exchanger network is divided into sub-networks which are optimized by a hybrid genetic algorithm. In additional steps these sub-networks are optimized by a monogenetic algorithm. An example consisting of 39 process streams was considered in detail. Significant improvements were made in reduction of total annual costs and the number of heat exchangers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Heat transfer area of heat exchanger (m2)

a, b :

Parameters for cost of heat exchangers ($/year)

c :

Parameter for cost of heat exchangers

C :

Total annual cost ($/year)

C min :

Minimum total annual cost ($/year)

C Inv :

Investment costs ($/year)

C op :

Operation costs ($/year)

c u :

Specific utility cost per unit duty ($/kWyear)

h :

Heat transfer coefficient (kW/m2K)

N c :

Number of cold process streams

N CU :

Number of cold utilities

N EX :

Number of heat exchangers

N h :

Number of hot process streams

N HU :

Number of hot utilities

N s :

Number of stages of a stage-wise superstructure

N SN :

Number of sub-networks

N U :

Number of heaters and coolers

NTU:

Number of transfer units

Q:

Heat load (kW)

R:

Ratio of heat capacity flow rate of hot stream to that of cold stream

T :

Stream temperature vector (°C)

t′:

Supply stream temperature of stream (°C)

t″:

Outlet stream temperature of a network before the stream is heated or cooled by utilities (°C)

t OUT :

Target temperature (°C)

t +OUT , t OUT :

Upper and lower bounds of target temperature (°C)

Δt m :

Logarithmic mean temperature difference (LMTD) (°C)

U :

Overall heat transfer coefficient (kW/m2K)

\( \dot{W} \) :

Heat capacity flow rate (kW/K)

Ω:

Set of HEN structures within a superstructure

ω:

Set of possible HEN structures within a superstructure with respect to given constraints

c:

Cold stream

CU:

Cold utility

h:

Hot stream

HU:

Hot utility

i:

Stage index

j:

Hot stream index

k:

Cold stream index

HU:

Hot utility

CU:

Cold utility

HEN:

Heat exchanger network

MINLP:

Mixed-integer-nonlinear-programming

GA:

Genetic algorithm

References

  1. Chen D, Yang S, Luo X, Wen Q, Ma H (2007) An explicit solution for thermal calculation and synthesis of superstructure heat exchanger networks. Chin J Chem Eng 15:296–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Linnhoff B, Hindmarsh E (1983) The pinch design method for heat exchanger networks. Chem Eng Sci 38:745–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Linnhoff B, Mason DR, Wardle I (1979) Understanding heat exchanger networks. Comput Chem Eng 3:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Floudas CA, Ciric AR, Grossmann IE (1986) Automatic synthesis of optimum heat exchanger network configurations. AICHE J 32:276–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Papoulias SA, Grossmann IE (1983) A structural optimization approach in process synthesis—III. Total processing system. Comput Chem Eng 7:723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papoulias SA, Grossmann IE (1983) A structural optimization approach in process synthesis—I. Utility systems. Comput Chem Eng 7:695–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papoulias SA, Grossmann IE (1983) A structural optimization approach in process synthesis—II. Heat recovery networks. Comput Chem Eng 7:707–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossmann IE, Sargent RWH (1978) Optimum design of heat exchanger networks. Comput Chem Eng 2:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewin DR, Wang H, Shalev O (1998) A generalized method for HEN synthesis using stochastic optimization—I. General framework and MER optimal synthesis. Comput Chem Eng 22:1503–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo X, Wen Q-Y, Fieg G (2009) A hybrid genetic algorithm for synthesis of heat exchanger networks. Comput Chem Eng 33:1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fieg G, Luo X, Jezowski J (2009) A monogenetic algorithm for optimal design of large-scale heat exchanger networks. Chem Eng Process 48:1506–1516

    Google Scholar 

  12. Björk K-M, Pettersson F (2003) Optimization of large-scale heat exchanger network synthesis problems. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Modelling and Simulation (MS 2003), IASTED/ACTA Press, California, USA, 24–26 Feb 2003

  13. Yee TF, Grossmann IE, Kravanja Z (1990) Simultaneous optimization models for heat integration—I. Area and energy targeting and modeling of multi-stream exchangers. Comput Chem Eng 14:1151–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pettersson F (2005) Synthesis of large-scale heat exchanger networks using a sequential match reduction approach. Comput Chem Eng 29:993–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research was supported by Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (No. 07ZZ89).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Ernst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernst, P., Fieg, G. & Luo, X. Efficient synthesis of large-scale heat exchanger networks using monogenetic algorithm. Heat Mass Transfer 46, 1087–1096 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-010-0685-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-010-0685-4

Keywords

Navigation