Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of the boiling temperature and heat flux in sugar–water solutions under pool-boiling conditions

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Condensing of a sugar–water solution is a widely used production process, especially in food industry. In this study, boiling temperature and heat transfer of different concentration levels of sugar/water solution is experimentally studied. In the experiment, the pool boiling with constant temperature difference between surface and boiling temperature is investigated. Boiling point of sugar/water solution depends on sugar mass concentration and on vapor phase pressure. A function is suggested to calculation the boiling temperature. The experimental data and the calculated values of boiling temperature are compared. The results are verified with previous investigations. It is determined that the heat flux between surface and sugar/water solution while pool boiling displays a linear relation with water mass concentration in the solution. Heat transfer coefficient could be determined in dependency of surface temperature and sugar mass concentration. Furthermore a function is suggested to predict the heat flux for engineering purpose, which is already used in similar form for pure substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

surface area, [m2]

c :

concentration, [kg/kg]

c p :

constant pressure specific heat, [kJ/kg K]

C :

consant

g :

gravity, [m/s2]

h :

heat transfer coefficient, [W/(m2 K)]

h :

enthalpy, [kJ/kg]

k :

coefficient, [kW/(m2°C1,3)]

m :

mass, [kg]

Pr :

Prandtl number

q :

heat flux, [W/m2]

Q :

heat, [kJ]

T :

temperature, [°C]

t :

time, [s]

ρ :

density, [kg/m3]

σ :

surface tension, [N/m2]

μ :

kinematics viscosity, [kg/m s]

b:

boiling

f:

fluid

g :

vapor, gas

fg:

difference in property between saturated liquid and saturated vapor

h:

heating

l:

lost

p:

pressure

s:

sugar

sat:

saturation

t:

total

w :

surface, wall

wt:

water

1:

initial

2:

final

n :

constant

S :

Rohsenow consant

References

  1. Holven AL (1936) Sucrose solutions: influence of pressure on boiling point elevation. Ind Eng Chem 28(4):452–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peres AM, Macedo EA (1997) A modified UNIFAC model for the calculation of thermodynamic properties of aqueous and non-aqueous solutions containing sugar. Fluid Phase Equilib 139:47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kays WM, ME Crawford, Weigand B (2005) Convective heat and mass transfer, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rohsenow WM (1952) A Method of correlating heat transfer data for surface boiling of liquids. Trans ASME 74:969–976

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nukiyama S (1934) The maximum and minimum values of heat Q transmitted from metal to boiling water under atmospheric pressure. J Jpn Soc Mech Eng 37:367–374 (Translated in Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 9 (1966) 1419–1433)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kılıç M, Yiğit A (2004) Isı Transferi. Alfa

  7. Hahne E, Barthau G (2006) Heat transfer and nucleation in pool-boiling. Int J Therm Sci 45:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JH, You SM, Pak JY (2006) Effects of heater size and working fluids on nucleate boiling heat transfer. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotthoff S, Gorenflo D, Danger E, Luke A (2006) Heat transfer and bubble formation in pool boiling: effect of basic surface modifications for heat transfer enhancement. Int J Therm Sci 45:217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Groll M, Mertz R, Kulenovic R (2005) Visualization and mechanisms of pool boiling of propane, isobutane and their mixtures on enhanced tubes with reentrant channels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 48:2516–2528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choon NK, Chakraborty A, Aye SM, Xiaolin W (2006) New pool boiling data for water with copper-foam metal at sub-atmospheric pressures: experiments and correlation. Appl Therm Eng 26:1286–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagen KD (1999) Heat transfer with application. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  13. Incropera FP, Dewitt DP (2002) Fundamental of heat and mass transfer, 5th edn. Wiley, NewYork

  14. Jeschar R, Alt R, Specht E (1990) Grundlagen der Warmeübertragung. Goslar

  15. Stephan K, Preusser B (1979) Warmeübergang und maximale Warmestromdichte beim Behaltersieden binarer und ternarer Flüssigkeitsgemische. Chem Ing.Tech 51:37, (Synopse MS 649/79)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kutateladze SS (1959) Kritisce Warmestromdichte bei einer unterkühlten Flüssigkeitsströmung. Energetica 7:229–239 und ızv. Akad.Nauk Otd. Tekh. Nauk 4 1951,529

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bubnik Z, Kadlec P, Urban D, Bruhns M (1995) Sugar Technologists manual chemical and physical data for sugar manufacturers and users, 8th edn. Formerly Zuckertechniker-Taschenbuch (available on http://www.sugartech.com)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Özdemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özdemir, M., Pehlivan, H. Prediction of the boiling temperature and heat flux in sugar–water solutions under pool-boiling conditions. Heat Mass Transfer 44, 827–833 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-007-0310-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-007-0310-3

Keywords

Navigation