Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oral vasoactive medication in intermittent claudication: utile or futile?

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of orally administered vasoactive medication in the management of intermittent claudication.

Setting: We limited our study to the products on the market in Belgium: cinnarizine, cyclandelate, isoxsuprine, naftidrofuryl, pentoxifylline, xanthinol nicotinate and buflomedil.

Data sources: We conducted a systematic literature search involving Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, the Cochrane Library, direct contact with marketing companies and key authors, snowballing and Science Citation Index search. We looked for randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with Fontaine stage II, in which pain-free and/or maximal walking distance were measured using a standardised exercise test. For isoxsuprine and xanthinol nicotinate, no trials conforming to these criteria were found. Thirty-six trials on cinnarizine, cyclandelate, buflomedil, naftidrofuryl and pentoxifylline met our inclusion criteria.

Study selection: After quality assessment, 26 trials were excluded, mainly because of short trial duration (less than 12 weeks), small sample size (less than 30 patients) and/or failure to report details on variability (standard deviation or confidence limits). For cinnarizine and cyclandelate, none of the three selected RCTs was included.

Data extraction: For buflomedil, of six published RCTs, two were included after quality assessment, each showing a marginally positive effect of buflomedil versus placebo. For naftidrofuryl, nine RCTs were selected; six were included of which five showed a significant positive result. The likelihood of publication bias and the heterogeneity of the results within and between trials precluded a meta-analysis. For pentoxifylline, of the 18 selected RCTs, only two could be included, both with inconclusive results.

Conclusion: A national consensus conference, based on this review, concluded that health resources should be allocated to prevention and rehabilitation of intermittent claudication rather than to reimbursement of these products with doubtful efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 11 November 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 10 February 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Backer, T., Vander Stichele, R., Warie, H. et al. Oral vasoactive medication in intermittent claudication: utile or futile?. E J Clin Pharmacol 56, 199–206 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280000114

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280000114

Navigation