Skip to main content
Log in

Reappraising the role of class Ic antiarrhythmics in atrial fibrillation

  • Point of View
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of the present systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of class Ic agents for cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with and without structural heart disease (SHD).

Methods

We focused on RCTs enrolling at least 50 adult patients with electrocardiogram-documented paroxysmal AF that compared either two pharmacological class Ic cardioversion agents (flecainide, propafenone), regardless of study design (parallel or crossover). We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Initial search was performed from inception to 15 July 2021 with no language restrictions.

Results

Intravenous flecainide is the most effective option for pharmacologic cardioversion of AF since only 2 patients need to be treated in order to cardiovert one more within 4 h. Most importantly, class Ic agents appear to be safe in the context of pharmacologic cardioversion of AF irrespective of the presence of SHD, pointing towards a possible reappraisal of the role in this setting.

Conclusion

We suggest that class Ic agents (with flecainide appearing to be more effective) should be used for pharmacologic cardioversion in stable AF patients presenting in emergency department with unknown medical history, after excluding severe cardiac disease through a bedside examination.

Registration number (DOI)

Available in https://osf.io/apwt7/, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/APWT7

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.

Abbreviations

ED:

Emergency department

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

SHD:

Structural heart disease

RCTs:

Randomized clinical trials

CER:

Control event rate

NNT:

Number needed to treat

References

  1. Patel NJ, Deshmukh A, Pant S, Singh V, Patel N, Arora S, Shah N, Chothani A, Savani GT, Mehta K, Parikh V, Rathod A, Badheka AO, Lafferty J, Kowalski M, Mehta JL, Mitrani RD, Viles-Gonzalez JF, Paydak H (2014) Contemporary trends of hospitalization for atrial fibrillation in the United States, 2000 through 2010: implications for healthcare planning. Circulation 129(23):2371–2379. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.008201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rozen G, Hosseini SM, Kaadan MI, Biton Y, Heist EK, Vangel M, Mansour MC, Ruskin JN (2018) Emergency department visits for atrial fibrillation in the United States: trends in admission rates and economic burden from 2007 to 2014. J Am Heart Assoc 7(15). https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.009024

  3. Sacchetti A, Williams J, Levi S, Akula D (2013) Impact of emergency department management of atrial fibrillation on hospital charges. West J Emerg Med 14(1):55–57. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.1.6893

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Martín A, Coll-Vinent B, Suero C, Fernández-Simón A, Sánchez J, Varona M, Cancio M, Sánchez S, Carbajosa J, Malagón F, Montull E, Del Arco C (2019) Benefits of rhythm control and rate control in recent-onset atrial fibrillation: the HERMES-AF study. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 26(9):1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 37(38):2893–2962. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan G-A, Dilaveris PE, Fauchier L, Filippatos G, Kalman JM, La Meir M, Lane DA, Lebeau J-P, Lettino M, Lip GYH, Pinto FJ, Thomas GN, Valgimigli M, Van Gelder IC, Van Putte BP, Watkins CL, Group ESD (2020) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Furie KL, Heidenreich PA, Murray KT, Shea JB, Tracy CM, Yancy CW (2019) 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 74(1):104–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan IA (2001) Single oral loading dose of propafenone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(2):542–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01116-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan IA (2003) Oral loading single dose flecainide for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 87(2–3):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00467-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan IA, Mehta NJ, Gowda RM (2003) Amiodarone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 89(2–3):239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00477-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reisinger J, Gatterer E, Lang W, Vanicek T, Eisserer G, Bachleitner T, Niemeth C, Aicher F, Grander W, Heinze G, Kühn P, Siostrzonek P (2004) Flecainide versus ibutilide for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of recent onset. Eur Heart J 25(15):1318–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H, Cucherat M, Kirkorian G, Touboul P (2003) Amiodarone versus placebo and class Ic drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 41(2):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02705-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsiachris D, Doundoulakis I, Pagkalidou E, Kordalis A, Deftereos S, Gatzoulis KA, Tsioufis K, Stefanadis C (2021) Pharmacologic cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 35(2):293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-07127-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azpitarte J, Alvarez M, Baún O, García R, Moreno E, Martín F, Tercedor L, Fernández R (1997) Value of single oral loading dose of propafenone in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Eur Heart J 18(10):1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Balla I, Petrela E, Kondili A (2011) Pharmacological conversion of recent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of three antiarrhythmic drugs. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 11(7):600–606. https://doi.org/10.5152/akd.2011.162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bellandi F, Cantini F, Pedone T, Palchetti R, Bamoshmoosh M, Dabizzi RP (1995) Effectiveness of intravenous propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled study. Clin Cardiol 18(11):631–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960181108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bianconi L, Mennuni M (1998) Comparison between propafenone and digoxin administered intravenously to patients with acute atrial fibrillation. PAFIT-3 Investigators. The Propafenone in Atrial Fibrillation Italian Trial. Am J Cardiol 82(5):584–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00412-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boriani G, Biffi M, Capucci A, Botto G, Broffoni T, Ongari M, Trisolino G, Rubino I, Sanguinetti M, Branzi A, Magnani B (1998) Conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: effects of different drug protocols. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21(11 Pt 2):2470–2474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01203.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Donovan KD, Dobb GJ, Coombs LJ, Lee KY, Weekes JN, Murdock CJ, Clarke GM (1992) Efficacy of flecainide for the reversion of acute onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 70(5):50A-55A. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)91078-i

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Botto GL, Capucci A, Bonini W, Boriani G, Broffoni T, Barone P, Espureo M, Lombardi R, Molteni S, Ferrari G (1997) Conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using a single oral loading dose of propafenone: comparison of two regimens. Int J Cardiol 58(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-5273(96)02841-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fresco C, Proclemer A, Pavan A, Buia G, Vicentini A, Pavan D, Morgera T (1996) Intravenous propafenone in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Italian Trial (PAFIT)-2 Investigators. Clin Cardiol 19(5):409–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960190515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ganau G, Lenzi T (1998) Intravenous propafenone for converting recent onset atrial fibrillation in emergency departments: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial. FAPS Investigators Study Group. J Emerg Med 16(3):383–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00003-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Hamilos ME, Marketou ME, Chlouverakis GI, Vardas PE (2007) A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of procainamide versus propafenone versus amiodarone for the conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 99(12):1721–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kondili A, Kastrati A, Popa Y (1990) Comparative evaluation of verapamil, flecainide and propafenone for the acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Wien Klin Wochenschr 102(17):510–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kosior DA, Kochanowski J, Scisło P, Piatkowski R, Postuła M, Rabczenko D, Opolski G (2009) Efficacy and tolerability of oral propafenone versus quinidine in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation: a randomized, prospective study. Cardiol J 16(6):521–527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Madonia S, De Simone M, Brai G, Gozzo D, Gristina A, Luciano L, Maisano S, Migliore G, Mineo R, Muzzo MP, Nicchi F, Randazzo A, Raspanti G, Rotolo G, Russo A, Sagona F, Schirosa M, Spinello M, Stancampiano R, Geraci E (2000) Intravenous versus oral initial load of propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation in the emergency room: a randomized trial. Ital Heart J 1(7):475–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Romano S, Fattore L, Toscano G, Corsini F, Coppo A, Catanzaro M, Romano A, Martone A, Caccavale F, Iodice E, Di Maggio O, Corsini G (2001) Effectiveness and side effects of the treatment with propafenone and flecainide for recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Ital Heart J Suppl 2(1):41–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alp NJ, Bell JA, Shahi M (2000) Randomised double blind trial of oral versus intravenous flecainide for the cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation. Heart 84(1):37–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.84.1.37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Donovan KD, Power BM, Hockings BE, Dobb GJ, Lee KY (1995) Intravenous flecainide versus amiodarone for recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 75(10):693–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80655-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Madrid AH, Moro C, Marín-Huerta E, Mestre JL, Novo L, Costa A (1993) Comparison of flecainide and procainamide in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 14(8):1127–1131. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/14.8.1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Martínez-Marcos FJ, García-Garmendia JL, Ortega-Carpio A, Fernández-Gómez JM, Santos JM, Camacho C (2000) Comparison of intravenous flecainide, propafenone, and amiodarone for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 86(9):950–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01128-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Negrini M, Gibelli G, de Ponti C (1994) A comparison of propafenone and amiodarone in reversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Curr Ther Res 55(11):1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80319-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ibrahim OA, Belley-Côté EP, Um KJ, Baranchuk A, Benz AP, Dalmia S, Wang CN, Alhazzani W, Conen D, Devereaux PJ, Whitlock RP, Healey JS, McIntyre WF (2021) Single-dose oral anti-arrhythmic drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Europace. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, Arensberg D, Baker A, Friedman L, Greene HL et al (1991) Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 324(12):781–788. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199103213241201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Anderson JL, Platia EV, Hallstrom A, Henthorn RW, Buckingham TA, Carlson MD, Carson PE (1994) Interaction of baseline characteristics with the hazard of encainide, flecainide, and moricizine therapy in patients with myocardial infarction. A possible explanation for increased mortality in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). Circulation 90(6):2843–2852. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Meinertz T, Lip GY, Lombardi F, Sadowski ZP, Kalsch B, Camez A, Hewkin A, Eberle S (2002) Efficacy and safety of propafenone sustained release in the prophylaxis of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (The European Rythmol/Rytmonorm Atrial Fibrillation Trial [ERAFT] Study). Am J Cardiol 90(12):1300–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02867-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hyman MC, Mustin D, Supple G, Schaller RD, Santangeli P, Arkles J, Lin D, Muser D, Dixit S, Nazarian S, Epstein AE, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE, Frankel DS (2018) Class IC antiarrhythmic drugs for suspected premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 15(2):159–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dan GA, Martinez-Rubio A, Agewall S, Boriani G, Borggrefe M, Gaita F, van Gelder I, Gorenek B, Kaski JC, Kjeldsen K, Lip GYH, Merkely B, Okumura K, Piccini JP, Potpara T, Poulsen BK, Saba M, Savelieva I, Tamargo JL, Wolpert C (2018) Europace 20(5):731–732. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DT and ID proposed the structure of the paper, critically appraised the paper, and were the major contributors in writing the manuscript. EP proposed the statistical analysis. PT, CKA, and SZ screened all titles and abstracts, perused full texts for eligible records, and independently extracted data from eligible studies. KAG, KT, and CS critically appraised the paper and made the final suggestions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Tsiachris.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

• In this systematic review, intravenous flecainide is the most effective option for pharmacologic cardioversion of AF.

• Most importantly, class Ic agents appear to be extremely safe in the context of pharmacologic cardioversion of AF irrespective of the presence of structural heart disease, pointing towards a possible reappraisal of their role in this setting.

• We suggest that class Ic agents should be used for pharmacologic cardioversion in stable AF patients with unknown medical history, after excluding severe cardiac disease through a bedside examination.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 444 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsiachris, D., Doundoulakis, I., Tsioufis, P. et al. Reappraising the role of class Ic antiarrhythmics in atrial fibrillation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 78, 1039–1045 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03296-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03296-0

Keywords

Navigation