Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel mechanism of ACE inhibition–associated enhanced platelet reactivity: disproof of the ARB-MI paradox?

  • Pharmacodynamics
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) are important drugs in cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about which of these drug class is to be preferred. First analyses show that the blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) influences platelet reactivity. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of ACEI and ARB on platelet reactivity and thrombin generation.

Methods

We conducted a time series analysis in 34 patients. We performed light transmission aggregometry (LTA) to evaluate platelet reactivity. Results are given as maximum of aggregation (MoA). Thrombin generation was measured as endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) via calibrated automated thrombogram. Flow cytometry was used to analyze protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 expression.

Results

ACEI treatment significantly increased platelet reactivity already 4 h after initiation of treatment (prior vs. 4 h post ACEI: MoA 41.9 ± 16.2% vs. 55.2 ± 16.7%; p = 0.003). After switching from ACEI to ARB treatment, platelet reactivity decreased significantly (3 months after switching: MoA 34.7 ± 20.9%; p = 0.03). ACEI reduced endogenous thrombin potential significantly from before to 3 months after ACEI (ETP 1527 ± 437 nM × min vs. 1088 ± 631 nM × min; p = 0.025). Platelet thrombin receptor (PAR1) expression increased from 37.38 ± 10.97% before to 49.53 ± 6.04% after ACEI treatment (p = 0.036).

Conclusion

ACEI enhanced platelet reactivity. This can be reversed by changing to ARB. The mechanism behind RAAS influencing platelet function seems to be associated with PAR-1 expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are made available upon request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACEI:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

ARB:

Angiotensin II receptor blocker

AT2:

Angiotensin receptor subtype 2

ETP:

Endogenous thrombin potential

LTA:

Light transmission aggregometry

MI:

Myocardial infarction

MoA:

Maximum of aggregation

PAR:

Protease-activated receptor

RAAS:

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

TRAP:

Thrombin receptor activating peptide

References

  1. Dawber TR, Moore FE, Mann GV (1957) Coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 47:4–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Cohen ME, McNamara PM (1965) Vascular disease of the brain--epidemiologic aspects: the Farmingham study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 55:1355–1366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Kannel WB, Ho KK (1996) The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA. 275:1557–1562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Port S, Demer L, Jennrich R, Walter D, Garfinkel A (2000) Systolic blood pressure and mortality. Lancet. 355:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Messerli FH, Bangalore S (2017) Angiotensin receptor blockers reduce cardiovascular events, including the risk of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 135:2085–2087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Vark LC, Bertrand M, Akkerhuis KM, Brugts JJ, Fox K, Mourad JJ, Boersma E (2012) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors involving 158,998 patients. Eur Heart J. 33:2088–2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reboldi G, Angeli F, Cavallini C, Gentile G, Mancia G, Verdecchia P (2008) Comparison between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and death: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 26:1282–1289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, Chalmers J, Rodgers A, Rahimi K (2016) Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 387:957–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Bavishi C, Rimoldi SF (2018) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension: to use or not to use? J Am Coll Cardiol. 71:1474–1482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, Kahan T, Mahfoud F, Redon J, Ruilope L, Zanchetti A, Kerins M, Kjeldsen SE, Kreutz R, Laurent S, Lip GYH, McManus R, Narkiewicz K, Ruschitzka F, Schmieder RE, Shlyakhto E, Tsioufis C, Aboyans V, Desormais I, Group ESCSD (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 39:3021–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Rouleau JL, Kober L, Maggioni AP, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Van de Werf F, White H, Leimberger JD, Henis M, Edwards S, Zelenkofske S, Sellers MA, Califf RM, Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial I (2003) Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 349:1893–1906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Strauss MH, Hall AS (2006) Angiotensin receptor blockers may increase risk of myocardial infarction: unraveling the ARB-MI paradox. Circulation. 114:838–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, Price MJ, Jeong YH, Angiolillo DJ, Stone GW, Curzen N, Geisler T, Ten Berg J, Kirtane A, Siller-Matula J, Mahla E, Becker RC, Bhatt DL, Waksman R, Rao SV, Alexopoulos D, Marcucci R, Reny JL, Trenk D, Sibbing D, Gurbel PA, Working Group on On-Treatment Platelet R (2013) Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:2261–2273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Antoniak S, Cardenas JC, Buczek LJ, Church FC, Mackman N, Pawlinski R (2017) Protease-activated receptor 1 contributes to angiotensin ii-induced cardiovascular remodeling and inflammation. Cardiology. 136:258–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Antoniak S, Sparkenbaugh E, Pawlinski R (2014) Tissue factor, protease activated receptors and pathologic heart remodelling. Thromb Haemost. 112:893–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Polzin A, Schleicher M, Seidel H, Scharf RE, Merx MW, Kelm M, Zeus T (2015) High on-treatment platelet reactivity in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients. Eur J Pharmacol. 751:24–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Polzin A, Dannenberg L, Sophia Popp V, Kelm M, Zeus T (2016) Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and aspirin after interventional patent foramen ovale/ atrium septum defect closure. Platelets. 27:317–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Polzin A, Afzal S, Balzer J, Rassaf T, Kelm M, Zeus T (2016) Platelet reactivity in MitraClip patients. Vascul Pharmacol. 77:54–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Polzin A, Dannenberg L, Sansone R, Levkau B, Kelm M, Hohlfeld T, Zeus T (2016) Antiplatelet effects of aspirin in chronic kidney disease patients. J Thromb Haemost. 14:375–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Achilles A, Mohring A, Dannenberg L, Piayda K, Levkau B, Hohlfeld T, Zeus T, Kelm M, Polzin A (2017) Analgesic medication with dipyrone in patients with coronary artery disease: relation to MACCE. International journal of cardiology. 236:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dannenberg L, Erschoff V, Bonner F, Gliem M, Jander S, Levkau B, Kelm M, Hohlfeld T, Zeus T, Polzin A (2016) Dipyrone comedication in aspirin treated stroke patients impairs outcome. Vascul Pharmacol. 87:66–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Polzin A, Richter S, Schror K, Rassaf T, Merx MW, Kelm M, Hohlfeld T, Zeus T (2015) Prevention of dipyrone (metamizole) induced inhibition of aspirin antiplatelet effects. Thromb Haemost. 114:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krasopoulos G, Brister SJ, Beattie WS, Buchanan MR (2008) Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 336:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Born GV (1962) Aggregation of blood platelets by adenosine diphosphate and its reversal. Nature. 194:927–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hemker HC, Giesen P, AlDieri R, Regnault V, de Smed E, Wagenvoord R, Lecompte T, Beguin S (2002) The calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT): a universal routine test for hyper- and hypocoagulability. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 32:249–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tchaikovski SN, Vlijmen BJMVAN, Rosing J, Tans G (2007) Development of a calibrated automated thrombography based thrombin generation test in mouse plasma. J Thromb Haemost 5:2079–2086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bomback AS, Klemmer PJ (2007) The incidence and implications of aldosterone breakthrough. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 3:486–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reed BN, Street SE, Jensen BC (2014) Time and technology will tell: the pathophysiologic basis of neurohormonal modulation in heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 10:543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Kirsten Bartkowski and Kerstin Freidel.

Funding

Part of this work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LE 940/7-1 to A.P.; SFB1116 to A.P.) and the Forschungskommission of the Heinrich Heine University Medical School (No. 16-2014 and; No. 46-2016 to L.D.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.P. and T.H. designed the study, interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. C.H., P.M., L.D., R.M., K.T. and A.A. collected the samples, interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. M.G., C.K., B.L., V.V., T.P., T.Z. and M.K. supervised the study and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Polzin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics committee approval

The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and was accepted by the University of Düsseldorf Ethics Committee (n° 5505R).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key messages

What is already known about this subject?

• Influence of RAAS inhibitors on platelet reactivity is unknown so far.

What does this study add?

• ACE inhibitors enhanced platelet reactivity. However, this can be reversed by changing to ARB.

How might this impact on clinical practice?

• Patients with enhanced ischemic risk may get ARB as preferred RAAS inhibitor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helten, C., Mourikis, P., Dannenberg, L. et al. A novel mechanism of ACE inhibition–associated enhanced platelet reactivity: disproof of the ARB-MI paradox?. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 76, 1245–1251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02915-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02915-y

Keywords

Navigation