Pharmacokinetics of a new, nasal formulation of naloxone
- 887 Downloads
Nasal naloxone is wanted for bystander administration in opioid overdose and as a needle-free alternative for emergency medical personnel. Epidemiologic studies have indicated a therapeutic effect of bystander administration of low-concentration/high-volume formulations. The objective for this study was to describe the nasal pharmacokinetics of a new high-concentration/low-volume nasal formulation of naloxone.
This was an open, randomized triple crossover trial in healthy, human volunteers (n = 12) where two doses of nasal naloxone (0.8 and 1.6 mg) and one intravenous dose (1.0 mg) were compared. Fifteen serum samples were collected before and until 6 h after naloxone administration. Quantification of naloxone was performed by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.
Bioavailability was 0.54 (0.45–0.63) for the 0.8 mg and 0.52 (0.37–0.67) for the 1.6 mg nasal naloxone formulation. Maximum concentration levels (C max) were 1.45 ng/ml (1.07–1.84) for 0.8 mg and 2.57 ng/ml (1.49–3.66) for the 1.6 mg. Time to maximum concentrations (T max) were reached at 17.9 min (11.4–24.5) and 18.6 min (14.4–22.9) for the 0.8 mg and the 1.6 mg doses, respectively.
This nasal naloxone formulation had a rapid, systemic uptake and higher bioavailability than naloxone formulations not designed for IN use. This indicates that an optimized high-concentration/low-volume nasal spray formulation may deliver a therapeutic dose. The 1.6 mg nasal dose provided serum concentrations that surpassed those of 1.0 mg IV after 15–20 min and stayed above for the rest of the study period.
KeywordsNasal Intranasal Naloxone Pharmacokinetics Bioavailability Overdose
Thanks to the Unit for Applied Clinical Research, NTNU, for the assistance with GCP monitoring and providing the internet-based randomization, to the Clinical Research Facility, St. Olav’s University Hospital, for conducting the study, and to the Proteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, PROMEC, NTNU, for conducting the naloxone analysis. These infrastructures are all funded by the Faculty of Medicine, NTNU and the Central Norway Regional Health Authority. We also wish to acknowledge professor Thorsteinn Loftsson, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland for his valuable advises regarding the formulation. Thanks also to Richard Poulsson, Azanta, Denmark for valuable guidance and genuine interest in the project, and to Inge Christoffer Olsen at ICOStatistics for his aid with the statistical modeling. This study was funded by grants from the Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, Unimed Innovation/St. Olav’s University Hospital and Felles Forskningsutvalg, NTNU/St. Olav’s University Hospital, Norway.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical approval and informed consent
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki declaration, the principles of the International Conference on Harmonisation, and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. It was approved by the Regional Committee of Medical and Health Research Ethics (2013/1519/REK sør-øst A) and the Norwegian Medicines Agency (EudraCT number: 2013–000050-22) and registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02158117). Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects prior to inclusion. Participants were insured trough the Drug Liability Association, Norway, and compensated for each treatment visit with 1500 NOK (160 Euro/ 175 USD).
Declarations of interest
Ola Dale’s (OD) employer Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) have recently signed cooperation and licensing contracts with Den norske Eterfabrikk (DnE) to seek commercialization of the nasal naloxone formulation developed by OD. The latter regulates potential royalties for OD through NTNU. OD is engaged by DnE as Principle Investigator in a pharmacokinetic study of naloxone for which OD receives no personal honorarium. DnE has compensated OD for one travel from Trondheim to Oslo.
Arne Kristian Skulberg (AKS) has signed a non-compete contract with DnE lasting the duration of his PhD program at NTNU (estimated 2018). This does not limit AKS right to publish results. AKS will receive no financial benefit from the license agreement between DnE and NTNU. Other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 4.Health Products Regulatory Authority Naloxone 400 micrograms/ml solution for injection/infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics. http://www.webcitation.org/6g4edopWl Accessed 17/03/2016 2016
- 7.Kerr D, Kelly AM, Dietze P, Jolley D, Barger B (2009) Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 104(12):2067–2074. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02724.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.World Health Organization (2014) Community management of opioid overdose, WHO guidelines approved by the guidelines review committee. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Gladden M (2016) Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths—United States, 2000–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 64(50–51):1378–1382Google Scholar
- 13.Hussain A, Kimura R, Huang CH, Kashihara T (1984) Nasal absorption of naloxone and buprenorphine in rats. Int J Pharm 21(2):233–237Google Scholar
- 15.Adapt Pharma (2015) NARCAN® (naloxone hydrochloride) nasal spray - Patient Information Leaflet. http://www.webcitation.org/6g1Upt7eu. Accessed 15 March 2016
- 22.Hertz S (2012) Naloxone for outpatient use: data required to support an NDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.webcitation.org/6kK5i0JH1 Accessed September 6th 2016
- 23.U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2015) FDA moves quickly to approve easy-to-use nasal spray to treat opioid overdose. http://www.webcitation.org/6g1W28jYq Accessed 15/03/2016 2016
- 27.Barton ED, Colwell CB, Wolfe T, Fosnocht D, Gravitz C, Bryan T, Dunn W, Benson J, Bailey J (2005) Efficacy of intranasal naloxone as a needleless alternative for treatment of opioid overdose in the prehospital setting. J Emerg Med 29(3):265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.03.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Shah VP, Midha KK, Dighe S, McGilveray IJ, Skelly JP, Yacobi A, Layloff T, Viswanathan CT, Cook CE, McDowall RD et al (1991) Analytical methods validation: bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. Conference report. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 16(4):249–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Middleton LS, Nuzzo PA, Lofwall MR, Moody DE, Walsh SL (2011) The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal crushed buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in opioid abusers. Addiction 106(8):1460–1473. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03424.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Kaléo Pharma (2014) Evzio prescribing information. http://www.webcitation.org/6g1VdDwWl. Accessed 15 March 2016