Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of exenatide and liraglutide in Denmark: a drug utilization study

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to characterise the utilization of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues exenatide and liraglutide in Denmark.

Methods

From the Danish National Prescription Registry, we extracted all prescriptions for either liraglutide or exenatide twice-daily in the period 1 April 2007 to 31 December 2012. Using descriptive statistics, we calculated incidence rates, prevalence proportions, daily consumption, and concomitant drug use. For a subset of users we included data from other registries and characterised the baseline characteristics of incident users of GLP-1 analogues.

Results

We identified 21,561 and 2,354 users of liraglutide and exenatide respectively. From market entry in 2009 liraglutide showed an increasing prevalence reaching 2.4 per thousand inhabitants in 2012. Exenatide ranged between 0.01 and 0.25 per thousand inhabitants from 2007 to 2012. Treatment intensity showed geographical variation ranging from 1.84per thousand inhabitants to 3.22 per thousand inhabitants for liraglutide. Average doses were 1.34 mg/day (liraglutide) and 16.4 μg/day (exenatide). Treatment initiation was most often performed by a hospital physician and was not associated with any changes in concomitant treatment with antihypertensives, cholesterol-lowering drugs or anticoagulants. Of liraglutide and exenatide users, 38 % and 43 % also used insulin. Low kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min) was found in 10.1 % and 9.0 % of users of liraglutide and exenatide respectively.

Conclusions

The preferred GLP-1 analogue in Denmark is liraglutide. Certain aspects of the utilization of GLP-1 analogues, such as large regional differences and concomitant use of GLP-1 analogues and insulin, warrant further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment (2005) Type 2 diabetes. Health technology assessment of screening diagnosis and treatment. Dan Health Technol Assess 7(1)

  2. Carstensen B, Kristensen JK, Ottosen P, Borch-Johnsen K (2008) The Danish National Diabetes Register: trends in incidence, prevalence and mortality. Diabetologia 51:2187–2196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stovring H, Andersen M, Beck-Nielsen H, Green A, Vach W (2003) Rising prevalence of diabetes: evidence from a Danish pharmaco-epidemiological database. Lancet 362:537–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green A, Emneus M, Christiansen T, Bjørk S, Kristensen J (2006) The social impact of diabetes mellitus and diabetes care. Report 3: Type 2 diabetes in Denmark year 2001. SDU Health Econ Papers 2

  5. Institute for Rational Pharmacotherapy The Danish College of General Practitioners and the Danish Endocrine Society (2011) Guidelines for type-2 diabetes [in Danish]

  6. The Danish College of General Practitioners (2012) Clinical guideline for primary care: type 2-diabetes—a metabolic syndrome [in Danish]

  7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 352:854–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolen S, Feldman L, Vassy J, Wilson L, Yeh HC, Marinopoulos S et al (2007) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 147:386–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Selvin E, Bolen S, Yeh HC, Wiley C, Wilson LM, Marinopoulos SS et al (2008) Cardiovascular outcomes in trials of oral diabetes medications: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 168:2070–2080

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roussel R, Travert F, Pasquet B, Wilson PW, Smith SC Jr, Goto S et al (2010) Metformin use and mortality among patients with diabetes and atherothrombosis. Arch Intern Med 170:1892–1899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, Shah NS, Tankova T, Mitha IH et al (2009) Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care 32:84–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, Thomsen AB, During M, Shah N et al (2013) Long-term efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride and placebo, all in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes: 2-year results from the LEAD-2 study. Diabetes Obes Metab 15:204–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L, Malloy J, Walsh B, Yan P et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Lancet 376:431–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pratley RE, Nauck M, Bailey T, Montanya E, Cuddihy R, Filetti S et al (2010) Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. Lancet 375:1447–1456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meier JJ (2012) GLP-1 receptor agonists for individualized treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8:728–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Condition (2008) Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). Royal College of Physicians, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Epidemiology FL (2000) When an entire country is a cohort. Science 287:2398–2399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thygesen LC, Ersboll AK (2011) Danish population-based registers for public health and health-related welfare research: introduction to the supplement. Scand J Public Health 39:8–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kildemoes HW, Sorensen HT, Hallas J (2011) The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 39:38–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (2012 ) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2013, Oslo

  21. Gaist D, Sorensen HT, Hallas J (1997) The Danish prescription registries. Dan Med Bull 44:445–448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pedersen CB (2011) The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health 39:22–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Institute for Rational Pharmacotherapy (2011) The national recommendation list: ATC A10B blood glucose lowering drugs, excl. insulins [in Danish]

  24. Blonde L, Klein EJ, Han J, Zhang B, Mac SM, Poon TH et al (2006) Interim analysis of the effects of exenatide treatment on A1C, weight and cardiovascular risk factors over 82 weeks in 314 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 8:436–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buse JB, Henry RR, Han J, Kim DD, Fineman MS, Baron AD (2004) Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in sulfonylurea-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:2628–2635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Buse JB, Klonoff DC, Nielsen LL, Guan X, Bowlus CL, Holcombe JH et al (2007) Metabolic effects of two years of exenatide treatment on diabetes, obesity, and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes: an interim analysis of data from the open-label, uncontrolled extension of three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Clin Ther 29:139–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buse JB, Rosenstock J, Sesti G, Schmidt WE, Montanya E, Brett JH et al (2009) Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6). Lancet 374:39–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DeFronzo RA, Ratner RE, Han J, Kim DD, Fineman MS, Baron AD (2005) Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control and weight over 30 weeks in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:1092–1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fineman MS, Bicsak TA, Shen LZ, Taylor K, Gaines E, Varns A et al (2003) Effect on glycemic control of exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) additive to existing metformin and/or sulfonylurea treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:2370–2377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kendall DM, Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Zhuang D, Kim DD, Fineman MS et al (2005) Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Diabetes Care 28:1083–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Russell-Jones D, Vaag A, Schmitz O, Sethi BK, Lalic N, Antic S et al (2009) Liraglutide vs insulin glargine and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEAD-5 met + SU): a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 52:2046–2055

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zinman B, Hoogwerf BJ, Duran GS, Milton DR, Giaconia JM, Kim DD et al (2007) The effect of adding exenatide to a thiazolidinedione in suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146:477–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. The Danish National Institute for Health Data and Disease Control (Statens Serum Insititut). Medstat.dk; Cited 6/6/2013. Available from: www.medstat.dk/en

  34. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health. legemiddelforbrug.no. Accessed 6 June 2013. Available from: www.legemiddelforbruk.no

  35. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). Statistikdatabas för läkemedel. Accessed 6 June 2013. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik/statistikdatabas/lakemedel

  36. Finnish Medicines Agency (fimea). Lääketurvallisuus ja lääkeinformaatio: Kulutustiedot. Accessed 6 June 2013. Available from: www.fimea.fi/laaketieto/kulutustiedot

  37. Icelandic Medicines Agency (IMA). Drug consumption in Iceland 2008–2012. Accessed 6 June 2013. Available from: www.imca.is/imca/statistics/nr/235

  38. Danish Regions. Regioner.dk. Accessed 13 August 2013. Available from: http://www.regioner.dk/in+english

  39. Buse JB, Bergenstal RM, Glass LC, Heilmann CR, Lewis MS, Kwan AY et al (2011) Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 154:103–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. EMA. Summary of Product Characteristics—Byetta. Accessed 8 November 2012. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000698/WC500051845.pdf

  41. Ha C, Ullman TA, Siegel CA, Kornbluth A (2012) Patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials do not represent the inflammatory bowel disease patient population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:1002–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, Kusek JW, Van Lente F (2006) Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 145:247–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

FKK has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd, Novo Nordisk, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi and Zealand Pharma, is an advisory board member at Eli Lilly Danmark, Bristol-Myers Squibb/AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Zealand Pharma, and has consulted for AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Ono Pharmaceuticals and Zealand Pharma. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Pottegård.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pottegård, A., Bjerregaard, B.K., Larsen, M.D. et al. Use of exenatide and liraglutide in Denmark: a drug utilization study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 70, 205–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1595-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1595-4

Keywords

Navigation