Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drug use problems with self-injected low-molecular-weight heparins in primary care

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Outpatient subcutaneous therapies are becoming increasingly common. A literature search failed to find produced any studies on application problems pertaining to the self-injection of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) in a heterogeneous outpatient population under daily-life conditions. We therefore designed a study with the aim of recording drug use problems, patient satisfaction, compliance, problems arising from the injection site (abdomen vs. thigh), and residual drug volumes in pre-filled syringes used in self-injection therapy.

Methods

Patients were recruited in community pharmacies by 95 trained Master's students in pharmacy. Data were collected during recruitment and by means of structured questionnaire-based telephone interviews that were carried out at the beginning and the end of the LMWH treatment.

Results

The median age of the 213 patients enrolled in the study was 54 years [interquartile range (IQR) 39–70 years]; of these, 15.5% had their injections administered by a third person. The rate of self-reported non-compliance was 17.1%. At least one relevant problem was recorded in 85.0% of the cases. At the end of the treatment, 38.9% of the patients stated self-administration of the injections required some effort. The preferred injection site was the thigh (68.5%). An overall mean residual drug volume ≥10.0% was detected for 3.9% of the patients. If residual drug was present, a median of 11.2% (IQR 8.6–17.6%) of the total drug volume had not been injected. Patients injecting into the thigh showed a higher risk of leaving residual medication (odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.04–4.51).

Conclusions

Most patients had drug use problems, whereas no clear factors were associated with non-compliance, the injection site (apart from residual drug), and discomfort or effort required (apart from prior injection use).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, Colwell CW (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133[Suppl]:381S–453S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bates SM, Greer IA, Pabinger I, Sofaer S, Hirsh J (2008) Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133[Suppl]:844S–886S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti G (2008) Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133[Suppl 6]:160S–198S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Othieno R, Abu Affan M, Okpo E (2007) Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003076

  5. Matsagas MI (2004) Outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism using low molecular weight heparins. An overview. Int Angiol 23:305–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fahs PS, Kinney MR (1991) The abdomen, thigh, and arm as sites for subcutaneous sodium heparin injections. Nurs Res 40:204–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stäubli M, Suter J (2004) Die Komplikationenliste der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin. Schweiz Aerztezeitung 85:1109–1116

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huber AR (2005) Fragen aus der Praxis zum Thema Antikoagulation. Prim Care 5:773

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lemke H, Imhoff M, Lohlein D (1994) Increased wound healing disorders in patients with inguinal hernia caused by administration of antithrombotic agents in the abdominal wall. Chirurg 65:714–716

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donaldson J, Knowles CH, Clark SK, Renfrew I, Lobo MD (2007) Rectus sheath haematoma associated with low molecular weight heparin: a case series. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:309–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuculi F, Gurzeler J (2006) What is your diagnosis? Rectus sheath hematoma. Praxis 95:11–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andereya S, Kalicke T, Hopf KF, Buschmeier M, Muhr G (2003) Serious complication after subcutaneous injection of heparin for prophylaxis of thromboembolism. Case report. Unfallchirurg 106:182–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pessina I, Bocchia M, Giansante P, Vaghi A (2003) Hematoma of the rectus muscle of abdomen in a patient treated with nadroparin. Recenti Prog Med 94:321–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Luyx C, Vanpee D, Douala C, Gillet JB (2001) Acute dyspnea in a woman with swelling of the left leg treated with low molecular weight heparin. Am J Emerg Med 19:223–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morau D, Barthelet Y, Spilmann E, d'Athis F (2000) Hematoma of the right rectus abdominis in relation to treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin. Ann Fr Anesth Rèanim 19:69–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berna JD, Zuazu I, Madrigal M, Garcia-Medina V, Fernandez C, Guirado F (2000) Conservative treatment of large rectus sheath hematoma in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy. Abdom Imaging 25:230–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsapatsaris NP (1991) Low-dose heparin. A cause of hematoma of rectus abdominis. Arch Intern Med 151:597–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Webb KB, Hadzima S (1987) Hematoma of the rectus abdominis muscle: a complication of subcutaneous heparin therapy. South Med J 80:911–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zaybak A, Khorshid L (2008) A study on the effect of the duration of subcutaneous heparin injection on bruising and pain. J Clin Nurs 17:378–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chan H (2001) Effects of injection duration on site-pain intensity and bruising associated with subcutaneous heparin. J Adv Nurs 35:882–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spahn G (2002) Compliance with self-administration of heparin injections in outpatients. Eur J Trauma 28:104–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Colwell CW, Pullido P, Hardwick ME, Morris BA (2005) Patient compliance with outpatient prophylaxis: an observational study. Orthopedics 28:143–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watts AC, Howie CR, Simpson AH (2006) Assessment of a self-administration protocol for extended subcutaneous thromboprophylaxis in lower limb arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:107–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Le Gall C, Jacques E, Medjebeur C, Darques L, Briand F, Haddad J, Bleichner G (2006) Low molecular weight heparin self-injection training: assessment of feasibility, tolerance and economic analysis in emergency departments. Eur J Emerg Med 13:264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mengiardi S, Goepfert B, Tsakiris DA, Hersberger KE (2009) Pitfalls in patient self-management of subcutaneous drug application: removal of rubber protection caps from ready-to-use syringes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 65:1061–1062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jorgensen JT, Romsing J, Rasmussen M, Moller-Sonnergaard J, Vang L, Musaeus L (1996) Pain assessment of subcutaneous injections. Ann Pharmacother 30:729–732

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. da Silva AA, Cassiani SH, Optiz SP (2002) Evaluation of the technique of subcutaneous administration of heparin in the development of hematomas. Rev Bras Enferm 55:128–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lalezari JP, Patel IH, Zhang X, Dorr A, Hawker N, Siddique Z, Kolis SJ, Kinchelow T (2003) Influence of subcutaneous injection site on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide (T-20) in HIV-1-infected patients. J Clin Virol 28:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frid A, Hardebo JE (1997) The thigh may not be suitable as an injection site for patients self-injecting sumatriptan. Neurology 49:559–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participating community pharmacies for their cooperation. We also thank the Master’s students for data collection, the patients for participating in the study, Michael Mittag for his support in the statistical analysis, and Irene Vogel Kahmann, Raphaela von Grünigen, Joëlle Bader, and Paul Lavender for their valuable contributions.

Conflict of interest

This study was supported by Pfizer AG through an unrestricted Investigator-Initiated Research Grant (IIRG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seraina Mengiardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mengiardi, S., Tsakiris, D.A., Lampert, M.L. et al. Drug use problems with self-injected low-molecular-weight heparins in primary care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67, 109–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0956-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0956-5

Keywords

Navigation