Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical key issues and fundamental rights in paediatric research

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This article is aimed at describing the methodology of “ethical reasoning” that finally led TEDDYNoE (Task-force in Europe for Drug Development for the Young) to propose the integration of international human rights law to develop coherent and exhaustive ethical recommendations on paediatric research at a European level.

Methods

A large number of ethical guidelines and texts of varying legal force existing in the field of clinical research and in particular related to paediatrics are analysed. Differences and non-coordinated implementation are pointed out.

Results

Differences, tensions or outright contradictions among the provisions of these texts can generate confusion leading to the adoption of different ethical standards across Europe. In this context, the real challenge is to ensure that each child involved in a clinical trial in the EU territory may rely directly on the same principles and rights. Taking international human rights law as the main starting point to develop a coherent framework for paediatric research that incorporates all the relevant ethical considerations and existing guidelines is a way of achieving this objective.

Conclusions

The implementation, at national and local level, of the “European Ethical Recommendations” (Eudralex 2008 vol. 10), based on international human rights law, seems to be the next step in facilitating a coordinated approach to the application of the Directive 2001/20/EC, as well as developing quality and ethically sound paediatric research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levine RJ (1988) Ethics and regulation of clinical research, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oberman M, Frader J (2003) Dying children and medical research: access to clinical trials as benefits and burden. Am J Law Med 29:301–317

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gill D (2004) Ethical principles and operational guidelines for good clinical practice in paediatric research. Recommendations of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Paediatr 163:53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. EC (2006) Regulation (EC) no. 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on medicinal products for paediatric use, amended by Regulation (EC) no. 1902/2006. Offic J Eur Union L 378 :1–19

  5. Gevers JKM (2008) Editorial. Medical research involving children. Eur J Health Law 15(2):103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations General Assembly (1948) Universal declaration of human rights. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/. Accessed July 2009

  7. United Nations General Assembly (1989) Convention on the rights of the child.http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm. Accessed July 2009

  8. Kurz R, Gill D, Mjones S (2006) Ethical issues in the daily medical care of children. Eur J Paediatr 165:83–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. TEDDY (2007) Recommendations on ethical issues on medicine for children for European and national institutions preparation. http://www.teddyoung.org/download/9_RecommendationsonethicalissuesonmedicineforchildrenforEuropeanandNationalInstitutionspreparation(includingissuesonclinicaltrials).pdf. Accessed July 2009

  10. European Union (2008) Ethical considerations for clinical trials performed in children. Recommendations of the ad hoc group for the development of implementing guidelines for Directive 2001/20/EC relating to good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/paediatrics/docs/paeds_ethics_consultation20060929.pdf. Accessed July 2009

  11. World Medical Association (2008) Declaration of Helsinki. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm. Accessed July 2009

  12. CIOMS – WHO (2002) International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm. Accessed July 2009

  13. ICH (2002) International conference on harmonization of technical requirements for the registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R1), CPMP/ICH/135/95 of 10 July 1996. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/013595en.pdf. Accessed July 2009

  14. ICH (1999) Clinical investigation of medicinal products in the paediatric population E11. Note for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the paediatric population, CPMP/ICH/27H/99. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/271199en.pdf. Accessed July 2009

  15. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) The Belmont report: the ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html. Accessed July 2009

  16. CIOMS-WHO (2009) International ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies. http://www.cioms.ch/frame_ethical_guidelines_2009.htm. Accessed July 2009

  17. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical. JAMA 283(20):2701–2711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanderpool HY (1996) The ethics of research involving human subjects. University Publishing Group, Frederick, MD

    Google Scholar 

  19. Werthorn LA, Scherer DG (1994) Children’s involvement in research participation decisions. In: Grodin MA, Glantz LH (eds) Children as research subjects. Science, Ethics and Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 133–179

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shevell MI (2002) Ethics of clinical research in children. Semin Pediatr Neurol 9(1):46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Council of Europe (2005) Additional protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning biomedical research. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/195.htm. Accessed July 2009

  23. Burke TM, Abramovitch R, Zlotkin S (2005) Children’s understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research. J Med Ethics 31:715–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Levy MDL, Larcher V, Kurz R (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162:629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi WC, Reynolds W, Nelson RM (2003) Child assent and parental permission in paediatric research. Theor Med 24:131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rothmier JD, Lasley MV, Shapiro GG (2003) Factors influencing consent in paediatric clinical research. Paediatrics 111:1037–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ungar D, Joffe S, Kodish E (2006) Children are not small adults: documentation of assent for research involving children. J Paediatr 149(1):31–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chappuy H, Gary A, Chéron G, Tréluyer JM (2005) Le consentement dans les essays cliniques pédiatriques. Arch Pédiatr 12:778–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. EC (2001) Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Off J Eur Union L121:34–44

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lenoir N, Mathieu B (1998) Les normes internationales de la bioéthique. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  31. Altavilla A, Giaquinto C, Ceci A (2008) European survey on ethical and legal framework of clinical trials in paediatrics: results and perspectives. J Int Bioéthique 19(3):17–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Altavilla A, Giaquinto C et al (2009) Activity of ethics committees in Europe on issues related to clinical trials in paediatrics: results of a survey. Pharm Policy Law 11:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  33. Altavilla A (2008) Clinical research with children: the European legal framework and its implementation in French and Italian law. Eur J Health Law 15(2):109–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Council of Europe (1997) Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine. ETS no. 164. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm. Accessed July 2009

  35. European Union (2001) Charter of fundamental rights of European Union. Offic J Eur Comm C364:1–22. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf. Accessed July 2009

  36. UNESCO (1997) Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13177&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed July 2009

  37. UNESCO (2005) Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed July 2009

  38. UNESCO (2003) International declaration on human genetic data. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17720&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed July 2009

  39. EU (2005) Directive 2005/28/EC of 8 April 2005 laying down principles and detailed guidelines for good clinical practice as regards investigational medicinal products for human use, as well as the requirements for authorization of the manufacturing or importation of such products. Offic J Eur Union L91:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  40. EU (1995) Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Offic J Eur Comm L 281:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  41. EC (2006) Detailed guidance on the application form and documentation to be submitted in an application for an ethics committee opinion on a clinical trial on medicinal products for human use. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol-10/12_ec_guideline_20060216.pdf. Accessed July 2009

  42. Mann J (1996) Health and human rights. Protecting human rights is essential for promoting health. Br Med J 312:924

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Edwards SD, McNamee MJ (2005) Ethical concerns regarding guidelines for the conduct of clinical research on children. J Med Ethics 31:351–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Caldwell PHY, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC (2004) Clinical trials in children. Lancet 364:803–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Buchner B, Hart D (2008) Research with minors in Germany. Eur J Health Law 15(2):127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lötjönen S (2008) Medical research on minors in Finland. Eur J Health Law 15(2):135–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kenter MJH (2008) Legislation and review of medical research with minors in the Netherlands. Eur J Health Law 15(2):145–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pinxten W, Dierickx K, Nys H (2008) The implementation of Directive 2001/20/EC into Belgian law and specific provisions on paediatric research. Eur J Health Law 15(2):153–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Canellopoulou-Bottis M (2008) Research with minors in Greece and the EU Directive on clinical trials. Eur J Health Law 15(2):163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sheikh AA (2008) Ireland and medical research with minors: some medico-legal aspects. Eur J Health Law 15(2):169–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Meaux JB, Bell PL (2001) Balancing recruitment and protection: children as research subjects. Issues Compr Paediatr Nurs 24:241–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ten Have HAMJ, Jean MS (2009) The Unesco universal declaration on bioethics and human rights, background, principles and application. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This contribution is part of the Task-force in Europe for Drug Development for the Young (TEDDY) Network of Excellence supported by the European Commission’s Sixth Framework Program (Contract n. 0005216 LSHBCT- 2005-005126).

Conflict of interest disclosure statement

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France

    Annagrazia Altavilla

  2. Espace Ethique Méditerranéen (E.A.3783), Hôpital Adultes de la Timone, 264, Rue Saint Pierre, 13385, CEDEX 5 Marseille, France

    Annagrazia Altavilla

Authors
  1. Annagrazia Altavilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annagrazia Altavilla.

Additional information

Part of TEDDY Supplement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altavilla, A. Ethical key issues and fundamental rights in paediatric research. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67 (Suppl 1), 117–123 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0929-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0929-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation