Skip to main content
Log in

Healthy volunteers and early phases of clinical experimentation

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of early phase trials is to gain knowledge about the clinical suitability of novel compounds, without pursuing specific therapeutic purposes. Healthy volunteers usually represent the ideal model for conducting phase I clinical trials, in order to investigate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as to document safety and tolerability without interference by concomitant pathological conditions. The increasing cost of novel drug development, in conjunction with ethical considerations, has fostered a new procedure for first-in-man trials, designated as “phase 0,” which is conducted very early on a limited number of healthy volunteers who are exposed to low drug levels. The present review discusses issues concerning the enrollment of healthy volunteers in the early phase of drug development from different points of view, with some focus on the Italian experience. From the ethical standpoint, much discussion revolves around payments to healthy volunteers. Most authors agree that an adequate remuneration must be provided to healthy subjects, while avoiding coercion and excessive psychological pressure. Pending the lack of international and national guidelines, our center for clinical drug experimentation has implemented an operative procedure to estimate payments for healthy volunteers based on specific items, including restriction, time spent, discomfort, and risk. Other unresolved issues about the recruitment of healthy volunteers are represented by the lack of international consensus on the definition of healthy status and the need for guidelines about advertisement on clinical trials addressed to potential participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pocock SJ (1983) Clinical trials: a practical approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buoen C, Bjerrum OJ, Thomsen MS (2005) How first-time-in-human studies are being performed: a survey of phase I dose-escalation trials in healthy volunteers published between 1995 and 2004. J Clin Pharmacol 45:1123–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman LF, Furberg C, DeMets DL (1998) Fundamentals of clinical trials. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. EMEA (2004) Position paper on non-clinical safety studies to support clinical trials with a single microdose. CPMP/SWP/2599/02/Rev 1. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/swp/259902en.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2010

  5. Del Tacca M, Pasqualetti G, Di Paolo A, Virdis A, Massimetti G, Gori G, Versari D, Taddei S, Blandizzi C (2009) Lack of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between generic and branded amoxicillin formulations. A post-marketing clinical study on healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 68:34–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Royal College of Physicians (1986) Research on healthy volunteers. J R Coll Physicians 20:243–257

    Google Scholar 

  7. Association of British Pharmaceuticals Industries (1988) Guidelines for medical experimentation in non-patient human volunteers. ABPI, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. EMEA (1998) Pharmacokinetic studies in man. 3CC3A. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/3cc3aen.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010

  9. World Medical Association (2008) Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html. Accessed 11 January 2010

  10. EMEA (2002) Guideline for good clinical practice. ICH Topic E 6 (R1). http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/013595en.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010

  11. EMEA (2009) Non-clinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials for pharmaceuticals. ICH topic M3, CPMP/ICH/286/95. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/028695en.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010

  12. EMEA (2007) Strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human clinical trials with investigational medicinal products. CHMP/SWP/28367/07. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/swp/2836707enfin.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010

  13. EMEA (2007) Recommendation on the need for revision of CHMP. Note for guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence. CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/9816. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/20094307en.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010

  14. Schellens JH (2009) Phase 0 (zero) clinical trials: more than zero benefit? Eur J Cancer 45:728–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill TP (2007) Phase 0 trials: are they ethically challenged? Clin Cancer Res 13:783–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. EMEA (2006) Concept paper on development of a CHMP guideline on the non-clinical requirements to support early phase I clinical trials with pharmaceutical compounds. EMEA/CHMP/SWP/91850/2006. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/swp/9185006en.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2010

  17. FDA (2006) Guidance for industry, investigators, and reviewers. Exploratory IND studies. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm078933.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2010

  18. Harris PA, Lane L, Biaggioni I (2005) Clinical research subject recruitment: the Volunteer for Vanderbilt Research Program www.volunteer.mc.vanderbilt.edu. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12:608–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bramstedt KA (2007) Recruiting healthy volunteers for research participation via internet advertising. Clin Med Res 5:91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dickert N, Emanuel E, Grady C (2002) Paying research subjects: an analysis of current policies. Ann Intern Med 136:368–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iltis AS (2009) Payments to normal healthy volunteers in phase I trials: avoiding undue influence while distributing fairly the burdens of research participation. Med Philos 34:68–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkinson M (2005) Payments to research subjects. Monash Bioeth Rev 24:70–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grady C, Dickert N, Jawetz T, Gensler G, Emanuel E (2005) An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants. Contemp Clin Trials 26:365–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bentley JP, Thacker PG (2004) The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process. Med Ethics 30:293–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schonfeld TL, Brown JS, Weniger M, Gordon B (2003) Research involving the homeless: arguments against payment in kind. IRB 25:17–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sears JM (2001) Payment of research subjects: a broader perspective. Am J Bioeth 1:66–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilkinson M, Moore A (1999) Inducements revisited. Bioethics 13:114–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McNeill P (1997) Paying people to participate in research: why not? A response to Wilkinson and Moore. Bioethics 11:390–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Resnick DB (2008) Increasing the amount of payment to research subjects. Med Ethics 34:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bechtel PR, Alvan G (1989) Criteria for the choice and definition of healthy volunteers and or patients for phase I and phase II studies in drug development. Commentary on an action for cooperative research. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36:549–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kenter MJ, Cohen AF (2006) Establishing risk of human experimentation with drugs: lessons from TGN1412. Lancet 368:1387–1391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. EMEA (2007) Guideline on requirements for first-in-man clinical trials for potential high-risk medicinal products. CHMP/SWP/28367/2007. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/swp/2836707en.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Del Tacca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasqualetti, G., Gori, G., Blandizzi, C. et al. Healthy volunteers and early phases of clinical experimentation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 66, 647–653 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0827-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0827-0

Keywords

Navigation