Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adverse events of blood-pressure-lowering drugs: evidence of high incidence in a clinical setting

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Our primary objective was to determine the incidence of AEs of antihypertensive drugs in a cohort of outpatients attending a specialized clinic. The secondary objectives were to determine the incidence of AEs by classes of blood-pressure-lowering drugs used in monotherapy and to identify risk factors for the occurrence of AEs.

Methods

In a prospectively planned cohort study, patients attending a hypertension outpatient clinic were systematically interrogated about the occurrence of AEs of blood-pressure-lowering drugs. We compared the incidence of AEs by classes of drugs employed in monotherapy and identified risk factors for the occurrence of AEs in a logistic regression model.

Results

Participants were followed for 12.3 ± 12.2 months. In total, 534 (35.4%) of 1,366 patients treated with blood pressure drugs complained of at least one AE during the follow-up, corresponding to an incidence of 31.3 AEs per 1,000 patients/month [95% confidence interval (CI) 28.6–33.9). The systolic blood pressure in the initial evaluation (P = 0.002) and use of two or more drugs (P < 0.001) were associated with higher incidence of AEs. The incidence of AEs was higher among patients treated with calcium channel blockers in monotherapy than in patients treated with diuretics (47.2 vs. 7.6%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Adverse events of blood-pressure-lowering drugs are quite frequent in a clinical context, and may influence the adherence to treatment. Patients under treatment with diuretics in monotherapy have the lower incidence of AEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright, JT Jr, Roccella EJ (2003) The Seventh Report of Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. JAMA 289:2560–2582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuchs FD, Gus M, Moreira WD, Moreira LB, Moraes RS, Rosito GA, Sorucco A, Atanazio P, Machado R (1997) Blood pressure effects of antihypertensive drugs and changes in lifestyle in a Brazilian hypertensive cohort. J Hypertens 15:783–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen JS (2001) Adverse drug effects, compliance, and initial doses of antihypertensive drugs recommended by the Joint National Committee vs the Physician’s Desk Reference. Arch Intern Med 161:880–885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jokisalo E, Kumpusalo E, Enlund H, Takala J (2001) Patient’s perceived problems with hypertension and attitudes towards medical treatment. J Hum Hypertens 15:755–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization (WHO). National Centres participating in the WHO International Drug Monitoring Programme. 1991. http://www.who-umc.org/DynPage.aspx?id=22676 (Cited March, 2006)

  6. Papademetriou V, Prisant M, Neutel JM, Weir MR (1998) Efficacy of low-dose combination of bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine and enalapril in men and women with essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 81:1363–1365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones JK, Gorkin L, Lian JF, Staffa JA, Fletcher AP (1995) Discontinuation of and changes in treatment after start of new courses of antihypertensive drugs: a study of a United Kingdom population. BMJ 311:293–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross SD, Akhras KS, Zhang SH, Rozinsky M, Nalysnyk L (2001) Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs due to adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 21:940–953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Dahlöf B, Gill H, Hedner T, Säljö R (1998) Perceived symptoms amongst hypertensive patients in routine clinical practice - a population-based study. J Intern Med 244:325–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Figueiras A, Tato F, Fontaiñas JBS, Gestal-Otero JJ (1999) Influence of physician’s attitudes on reporting adverse drug events: a case-control study. Med Care 37:809–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs FD, Gus M, Moreira LB, Moreira WD, Gonçalves SC, Nunes G (2003) Headache is not more frequent among patients with moderate to severe hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 17:787–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (1997) Arch Intern Med 157:2413–2446

  13. Olsen H, Klemetsrud T, Stokke H, Tretli S, Westheim A (1999) Adverse drug reactions in current antihypertensive therapy: a general practice survey of 2586 patients in Norway. Blood Press 8:94–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bardage C, Isacson D (2000) Self-reported side effects of antihypertensive drugs: An epidemiological study on prevalence and impact on health-state utility. Blood Press 9:328–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Benson J, Britten N (2003) Patients’ views about taking antihypertensive drugs: questionnaire study. BMJ 326:1314–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barsky AJ, Saintfort R, Rogers MP, Bonus JF (2002) Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon. JAMA 287:622–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neaton JD, Grimm RH Jr, Prineas RJ, Stamler J, Grandits GA, Elmer PJ, Cutler JA, Flack JM, Schoenberger JA, McDonald R, et al (1993) Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study: final results. JAMA 270:713–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McMurray JJ, Östergren J, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K (2003) CHARM Investigators and Committees Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet 362:767–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zanchetti A, Bond MG, Hennig M, Neiss A, Mancia G, Dal Palu C, Hansson L, Magnani B, Rahn KH, Reid JL, Rodicio J, Safar M, Eckes L, Rizzini P (2002) European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis investigators Calcium antagonist lacidipine slows down progression of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. Circulation 106:2422–2427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM (2004) Stroke mortality in São Paulo (1997–2003) - A description using the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 62:1008–1011

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghione S (1996) Hypertension-associated hypalgesia: evidence in experimental animals and humans, pathophysiological mechanisms, and potential clinical consequences. Hypertension 28:494–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. al’Absi M, Petersen KL, Wittmers LE (2000) Blood pressure but not parental history for hypertension predicts pain perception in women. Pain 88:61–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiehe M, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB, Moraes RS, Fuchs FD (2002) Migraine is more frequent in individuals with optimal and normal blood pressure: a population-based study. J Hypertens 20:1303–1306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tzourio C, Gagnière B, El Amrani M, Alpérovitch A, Bousser M-G (2003) Relationship between migraine, blood pressure and carotid thickness: a population-based study in the elderly. Cephalalgia 23:914–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagen K, Zwart JA, Holmen J, Svebak S, Bovim G, Stovner LJ (2005) The Nord-Trondelag Health Study Does hypertension protect against chronic musculoskeletal complaints? The Nord-Trondelag Health Study. Arch Intern Med 165:916–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Philipp T, Anlauf M, Distler A, Holzgreve H, Michaelis J, Wellek S (1997) Randomised, double blind, multicentre comparison of hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, nitrendipine, and enalapril in antihypertensive treatment: results of the HANE study. BMJ 315:154–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Cushman WC, Massie BM, Freis ED, Kochar MS, Hamburger RJ, Fye C, Lakshman R, Gottdiener J, et al (1993) A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. N Engl J Med 328:914–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE (2003) Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ 326:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hanson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P, Kjeldsen SE, Lindholm JH, Syvertsen JO, Lanke J, de Faire U, Dahlof B, Karlberg BE (2000) Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardivascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study. Lancet 356:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, Leew PW, Mancia G, Rosenthal T, Ruilope LM (2000) Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study (INSIGHT). Lancet 356:366–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fuchs FD (2003) Diuretics: drugs of choice for the initial management of patients with hypertension. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 1:35–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O´Brien E, Östergren J, for the ASCOT investigators (2005) Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 366:895–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sakai H, Hayashi K, Origasa H, Kusunoki T (1999) An application of meta-analysis techniques in the evaluation of adverse experiences with antihypertensive agents. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 8:169–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported, in part, by CNPq and FAPERGS, Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leila B. Moreira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonçalves, C.B., Moreira, L.B., Gus, M. et al. Adverse events of blood-pressure-lowering drugs: evidence of high incidence in a clinical setting. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63, 973–978 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0352-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0352-y

Keywords

Navigation