Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer of reboxetine into breastmilk, its plasma concentrations and lack of adverse effects in the breastfed infant

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the transfer of reboxetine into milk, the absolute and relative infant doses via milk and to assess plasma concentrations and adverse unwanted effects in the breastfed infant.

Methods

Multiple samples of blood and milk were obtained over a dose interval at steady-state from four women who were taking reboxetine for postnatal depression. Drug concentrations in plasma and milk were measured by high performance liquid chromatography and milk/plasma ratio (M/P), absolute infant dose and relative infant dose were estimated by standard methods. Their four, breastfed, infants were also examined clinically, and a blood sample was taken for drug analysis.

Results

The median (range) dose taken by the women was 6 (4-10) mg/day. There was no significant difference in reboxetine concentration between paired fore-and hind-milk samples. The mean (95% CI) M/P was 0.06 (0.03, 0.09). Absolute infant dose was 1.7 (0.7, 2.4) μg/kg/day for reboxetine while the relative infant dose was 2.0% (1.3, 2.7%). Three of the infants met normal developmental milestones and no adverse effects were seen in any infant. The fourth infant had developmental problems that were not associated with the maternal reboxetine therapy. The concentrations of reboxetine in plasma from the four infants were <4 μg/l, 2.6 μg/l, 2.3 μg/l and 5 μg/l, respectively.

Conclusion

The study suggests that reboxetine use by lactating women is safe for the breastfed infant. Nevertheless, our study had only four mother/baby pairs, and each decision to breastfeed should always be made on the basis of an individual risk/benefit analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Hara MW, Zekoski EM, Philipps LH, Wright EJ (1990) Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and nonchildbearing women. J Abnorm Psychol 99:3–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinclair D, Murray L (1998) Effects of postnatal depression on children’s adjustment to school. Teacher’s reports. Brit J Psychiatry 172:58–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zekoski EM, O’Hara MW, Wills KE (1987) The effects of maternal mood on mother-infant interaction. J Abnorm Child Psychol 15:361–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee CM, Gotlib IH (1991) Adjustment of children of depressed mothers: a 10-month follow-up. J Abnorm Psychol 100:473–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Murray L, Fiori-Cowley A, Hooper R, Cooper P (1996) The impact of postnatal depression and associated adversity on early mother-infant interactions and later infant outcome. Child Dev 67:2512–2526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (2005) Edronax, MIMS Abbreviated Prescribing Information. Version 5.00.0248 Edition. MediMedia Australia, St Leonards, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohman D, Cherma MD, Norlander B, Bengtsson F (2003) Determination of serum reboxetine enantiomers in patients on chronic medication with racemic reboxetine. Ther Drug Monit 25:174–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burrows GD, Maguire KP, Norman TR (1998) Antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine: a review. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl) 14:4–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mucci M (1997) Reboxetine: a review of antidepressant tolerability. J Psychopharmacol 11:S33–S37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann JJ (2005) The medical management of depression. New Engl J Med 353:1819–1834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Centre for Health Statistics, Clinical growth charts. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/growthcharts/set1clinical/Cj41c017.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/growthcharts/set1clinical/Cj41c018.pdf Accessed: 24-1-2006

  12. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB (1967) The Denver development screening test. J Pediatr 71:181–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rossiter EJ (1993) The use of developmental screening and assessment instruments by paediatricians in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health 29:357–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rampono J, Kristensen JH, Hackett LP, Paech M, Kohan R, Ilett KF (2000) Citalopram and demethylcitalopram in human milk; distribution, excretion and effects in breast fed infants. Br J Clin Pharmacol 50:263–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kristensen JH, Ilett KF, Dusci LJ, Hackett LP, Yapp P, Wojnar-Horton RE, Roberts MJ, Paech M (1998) Distribution and excretion of sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline in human milk. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45:453–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Begg EJ, Duffull SB, Hackett LP, Ilett KF (2002) Studying drugs in human milk: time to unify the approach. J Hum Lact 18:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett PN (1996) Use of the monographs on drugs. In: Bennett PN (ed) Drugs and human lactation, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 67–74

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hale TW, Ilett KF (2002) Drug therapy and breastfeeding. From theory to clinical practice, 1st edn. Parthenon, London, pp 1–94

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lucas A, Gibbs JA, Lyster RL, Baum JD (1978) Creamatocrit: simple clinical technique for estimating fat concentration and energy value of human milk. Br Med J (Clin Res Edn) 1:1018–1020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim J, Riggs KW, Misri S, Kent N, Oberlander TF, Grunau RE, Fitzgerald C, Rurak DW (2006) Stereoselective disposition of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Br J Clin Pharmacol 61:155–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Begg EJ, Atkinson HC, Duffull SB (1992) Prospective evaluation of a model for the prediction of milk:plasma drug concentrations from physicochemical characteristics. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33:501–505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rampono J, Hackett LP, Kristensen JH, Kohan R, Page-Sharp M, Ilett KF (2006) Transfer of escitalopram and its metabolite demethylescitalopram into breastmilk. Br J Clin Pharmacol (in press)

  23. Edwards DM, Pellizzoni C, Breuel HP, Berardi A, Castelli MG, Frigerio E, Poggesi I, Rocchetti M, Dubini A, Strolin Benedetti M (1995) Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers. Single oral doses, linearity and plasma protein binding. Biopharm Drug Dispos 16:443–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McNamara PJ, Alcorn J (2002) Protein binding predictions in infants. AAPS Pharm Sci 4:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Pfizer Australia. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Deborah Oosterbaan and Mary Wallbank with sample collection on the study days.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth F. Ilett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hackett, L.P., Ilett, K.F., Rampono, J. et al. Transfer of reboxetine into breastmilk, its plasma concentrations and lack of adverse effects in the breastfed infant. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 62, 633–638 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0140-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0140-0

Keywords

Navigation