Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to letters EJCP 2004-0271.R1 and EJCP 2004-0275—response requested by Dr D.N. Bateman, Managing Editor

  • Letter to the Editors
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV et al (1997) Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 350:834–843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Linde K, Scholz M, Ramirez G, Clausius N, Melchart D, Jonas WB (1999) Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo controlled trials of homoeopathy. J Clin Epidemiol 52:631–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt K, Pittler MH, Ernst E (2001) A profile of journals of complementary and alternative medicine. Swiss Med Wkly 131:558–591

    Google Scholar 

  4. Resch KL, Ernst E, Garrow J (2004) A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy. J R Soc Med 93:164–167

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, Montori VM, Schiinemann H, Sprague S et al (2004) Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ 170:477–480

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson RA (1986) Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials. J Gen Intern Med 1:155–158

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH, Simms RW, Fortin PR, Felson DT, Minaker KL et al (1996) A study of manufacturer-supported trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of arthritis. Arch Intern Med 154:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  8. Djulbegovic B, Lacevic M, Cantor A, Fields KK, Bennett CL, Adams JR et al (2000) The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet 356:635–638

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clifford TJ, Barrowman NJ, Moher D (2002) Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res 2:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kjaergard LL, Als-Nielsen B (2002) Association between competing interests and authors’ conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ. BMJ 325:249–253

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Ernst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernst, E., Schmidt, K. Reply to letters EJCP 2004-0271.R1 and EJCP 2004-0275—response requested by Dr D.N. Bateman, Managing Editor. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61, 65–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0884-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0884-3

Keywords

Navigation