Skip to main content
Log in

The delusion of reducing sample size

  • Letter to the Editors
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Daly LE (1991) Confidence intervals and sample sizes: don’t throw out all your old sample size tables. BMJ 302:333–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laska EM, Meisner M, Siegel C (1999) Power and sample size in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decision Making 19:339–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods. 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

  4. Schlesselman JJ (1974) Sample size requirements in cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol 99:381–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Linnet K (1999) Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. Clin Chem 45:882–894

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Bégaud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bégaud, B., Fourrier, A., Moore, N. et al. The delusion of reducing sample size. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59, 711–712 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-003-0672-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-003-0672-5

Keywords

Navigation