Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy, safety and cost of new drugs acting on the central nervous system

  • Point of View
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To examine the degree of innovation of the products with indications for CNS diseases approved for the European market through the centralized procedure.

Methods

This paper examines the documentation available on nine products approved by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency in its first years of activity.

Results

The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products approved only five products by consensus (levacetylmethadol, levetiracetam, olanzapine, pramipexole, riluzole). Four were approved by majority (entacapone, memantine, rivastigmine, zaleplon). One product received a negative opinion, and five had the application withdrawn before reaching the Committee decision.

Conclusions

An analysis of the efficacy and safety profile of these products indicates that few minor therapeutic advances have been achieved in this area. Most approved products cover needs already met, at higher cost, without substantial improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garattini S, Bertele' V (2002) Efficacy, safety, and cost of new anticancer drugs. BMJ 325:269–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. EMEA (1999) Final opinion of the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products on the refusal of a marketing authorisation for Kronos. http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/opinion/06779en.pdf

  3. EMEA (2001) Public statement on the recommendation to suspend the marketing authorisation for Orlaam (levacetylmethadol) in the European Union. http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/press/pus/877601en.pdf

  4. Ruottinen HM, Rinne UK (1996) A double-blind pharmacokinetic and clinical dose-response study of entacapone as an adjuvant to levodopa therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 19:283–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rinne UK, Larsen JP, Siden A, Worm-Petersen J (1998) Entacapone enhances the response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations. Neurology 51:1309–1314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkinson Study Group (1997) Entacapone improves motor fluctuations in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease patients. Ann Neurol 42:747–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. EMEA (2000) European Public Assessment Report on Comtan. http://www.eudra.org/humandocs/humans/epar/comtan/comtan.htm

  8. Lieberman A, Ranhosky A, Korts D (1997) Clinical evaluation of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson's disease: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Neurology 49:162–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guttman M (1997) Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease. International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group. Neurology 49:1060–1065

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. EMEA (2000) European Public Assessment Report on Daquiran. http://www.eudra.org/humandocs/humans/epar/daquiran/Daquiran.htm

  11. EMEA (2000) European Public Assessment Report on Exelon. http://www.eudra.org/humandocs/humans/epar/exelon/exelon.htm

  12. Qizilbash N, Birks J, Lopez Arrieta J, Lewington S, Szeto S (2002) Tacrine for Alzheimer's disease (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Oxford

  13. Birks JS, Melzer D, Beppu H (2002) Donepezil for mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Oxford

  14. EMEA (2002) Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Summary of opinion for Ebixa. http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/opinion/0055302.pdf

  15. Kornhuber J, Weller M (1997) Psychotogenicity and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism: implications for neuroprotective pharmacotherapy. Biol Psychiatry 41:135–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. EMEA (2002) European Public Assessment Report on Rilutek. http://www.eudra.org/humandocs/humans/epar/rilutek/rilutek.htm

  17. Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Meininger V (1994) A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ALS/Riluzole Study Group. N Engl J Med 330:585–591

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lacomblez L, Bensimon G, Leigh PN, Guillet P, Meininger V (1996) Dose-ranging study of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet 347:1425–1431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Delumeau JC, Bejuit R, Truffinet P, Meininger V (2002) A study of riluzole in the treatment of advanced stage or elderly patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 249:609–615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. EMEA (2001) European Public Assessment Report on Sonata. http://www.eudra.org/humandocs/humans/epar/sonata/sonata.htm

  21. Walsh JK, Fry J, Erwin CW, Scharf M, Roth T, Vogel GW (1998) Efficacy and tolerability of 14-day administration of zaleplon 5 mg and 10 mg for the treatment of primary insomnia. Clinic Drug Invest 16:347–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Elie R, Ruther E, Farr I, Emilien G, Salinas E (1999) Sleep latency is shortened during 4 weeks of treatment with zaleplon, a novel nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic. J Clin Psychiatry 60:536–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. EMEA (2002) European Public Assessment Report on Keppra. http://www.eudra.org/humandocs/humans/epar/keppra/keppra.htm

  24. EMEA (2001) European Public Assessment Report on Olansek. http://www.eudra.org/humandocs/humans/epar/olansek/olansek.htm

  25. Meltzer HY (2001) Treatment of suicidality in schizophrenia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 932:44–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koro CE, Fedder DO, L'Italien GJ, Weiss SS, Magder LS, Kreyenbuhl J, Revicki DA, and Buchanan RW (2002) Assessment of independent effect of olanzapine and risperidone on risk of diabetes among patients with schizophrenia: population based nested case-control study. BMJ 325:243–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanina Y, Podolskaya A, Sedky K, Shahab H, Siddiqui A, Munshi F, Lippmann S (2002) Body weight changes associated with psychopharmacology. Psychiatr Serv 53:842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fontaine KR, Heo M, Harrigan EP, Shear CL, Lakshminarayanan M, Casey DE, Allison DB (2001) Estimating the consequences of anti-psychotic induced weight gain on health and mortality rate. Psychiatry Res 101:277–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Mrs. Judy Baggott and the G.A. Pfeiffer Memorial Library Staff for helpful editorial assistance. S.G. and V.B. are, respectively, member and expert of the CPMP. The views presented in this paper are those of the authors and should not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of the EMEA and/or its scientific committees. The works listed under "References" for each active substance refer to the EPAR on one brand product only, the first of those actually approved in alphabetical order. The web sites listed under "References" were last accessed on 11 September 2002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvio Garattini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garattini, S., Bertele', V. Efficacy, safety and cost of new drugs acting on the central nervous system. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59, 79–84 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-003-0569-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-003-0569-3

Keywords

Navigation