Skip to main content
Log in

Growth of the scyllarid lobsters Ibacus peronii and I. chacei

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth rates of the morphologically similar scyllarid lobsters Ibacus peronii (Leach, 1815) and I. chacei (Brown and Holthuis, 1998) are described using data from a tag/recapture study and from tagged lobsters kept in captivity. Within particular size classes, we found no differences in moult increments between male and female I. peronii nor between male and female I. chacei. Small individuals of both species always had larger moult increments than larger individuals. For I. peronii, females moulted more frequently than males, and smaller size classes moulted more frequently than larger size classes. Female I. peronii therefore grew more quickly than males and reached their estimated size at sexual maturity (51 mm carapace length) after ∼2 yr. Moulting of I. peronii was seasonal, with most lobsters (96.3%) moulting between October and January. We found no differences in growth rates of I. peronii at two locations along the east coast of Australia: Coffs Harbour in New South Wales (30°18′S; 153°08′E), and Lakes Entrance in Victoria (37°53′S; 148°00′E). For I. chacei, we found no differences in the frequency of moulting between males and females and, because we also found no differences in the moult increments between males and females, the growth rates of both sexes were the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 14 August 1999 / Accepted: 20 January 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, J., Kennelly, S. Growth of the scyllarid lobsters Ibacus peronii and I. chacei . Marine Biology 136, 921–930 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270000272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270000272

Keywords

Navigation