Abstract
The Iberian harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena meridionalis) population faces unique challenges, characterized by low population size and limited genetic diversity, underscoring the urgency of conservation efforts. However, a dearth of ecological information on this population hampers targeted conservation measures. This study addresses this knowledge gap by assessing the environmental and anthropogenic factors influencing the habitat use of Iberian harbour porpoises. Utilizing data collected from 195 daily boat surveys spanning 8 years along the north-western coast of Spain, we observed 287 harbour porpoise groups comprising 1383 individuals. Our analysis revealed a wide distribution of harbour porpoises along the continental shelf of the north-western Iberian Peninsula. Notably, this species exhibited a preference for areas characterized by high productivity, influenced by seasonal coastal upwelling phenomena and tidal flow. Our results emphasize the positive correlation between the presence of fishing boats and porpoise habitat use, highlighting the risks associated with bycatch in gear such as bottom-set gillnets and trammel nets, and the need for comprehensive mitigation measures. Additionally, our findings underscore the necessity for comprehensive conservation strategies to address risks associated with marine traffic and habitat alteration due to the expanding development of offshore wind farms in the region. This research also establishes a baseline for future environmental monitoring programs, contributing to the long-term conservation and management of the Iberian harbour porpoise population.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is available in a public repository: Díaz López, Bruno; Methion, Séverine (2024), “Dataset: Habitat Use by Iberian Harbour Porpoises: Ecological and Human Factors”, Mendeley Data, V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/4rw7ssp3y8.1
References
Ben Chehida Y, Stelwagen T, Hoekendijk J, Ferreira M, Eira C, Pereira A, Nicolau L, Thumloup J, Fontaine M (2021) Harbor porpoise losing its edges: genetic time series suggests a rapid population decline in Iberian waters over the last 30 years. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.19.456945
Benke H, Bräger S, Dähne M, Gallus A, Hansen S, Honnef CG, Jabbusch M, Koblitz JC, Krügel K, Liebschner A, Narberhaus I, Verfuß UK (2014) Baltic Sea harbour porpoise populations: status and conservation needs derived from recent survey results. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 495:275–290. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10587
Birkun Jr A, Frantzis A (2008) Phocoena phocoena ssp. relicta. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, e.T17030A6737111.
Bjørge A, Skern-Mauritzen M, Rossman MC (2013) Estimated bycatch of harbour porpoise (phocoena phocoena) in two coastal gillnet fisheries in norway, 2006–2008. mitigation and implications for conservation. Biol Cons 161:164–173
Bland R, Methion S, Sharp SP, Díaz López B (2022) Assessing variability in marine traffic exposure between baleen whale species off the galician coast Spain. Mar Pollut Bull 186:114439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114439
Brandt MJ, Dragon AC, Diederichs A, Bellmann MA, Wahl V, Piper W, Nabe-Nielsen J, Nehls G (2018) Disturbance of harbour porpoises during construction of the first seven offshore wind farms in germany. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 596:213–232. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12591
Brennecke D, Siebert U, Kindt-Larsen L, Midtiby HS, Egemose HD, Ortiz ST, Knickmeier K, Wahlberg M (2022) The fine-scale behavior of harbor porpoises towards pingers. Fish Res 255:106437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106437
Bridge C, Methion S, Díaz López B (2023) The impact of anthropogenic pollutants on the distribution of a marine top predator within a coastal estuarine system. Environ Monit Assess 195(7):898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-10952-x
Carstensen J, Henriksen OD, Teilmann J (2006) Impacts of offshore wind farm construction on harbour porpoises: acoustic monitoring of echolocation activity using porpoise detectors (T-PODs). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 321:295–308. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps321295
Díaz López B, Methion S (2017) The impact of shellfish farming on common bottlenose dolphins’ use of habitat. Mar Biol 164:83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3125-x
Díaz López B, Methion S (2018) Does interspecific competition drive patterns of habitat use and relative density in harbour porpoises? Mar Biol 165:92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3410-4
Díaz López B, Methion S (2019) Habitat drivers of endangered rorqual whales in a highly impacted upwelling region. Ecol Ind 103:610–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.070
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36(1):27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
Dyndo M, Wiśniewska DM, Rojano-Doñate L, Madsen PT (2015) Harbour porpoises react to low levels of high-frequency vessel noise. Sci Rep 5:11083. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11083
Edrén S, Wisz MS, Teilmann J, Dietz R, Söderkvist J (2010) Modelling spatial patterns in harbour porpoise satellite telemetry data using maximum entropy. Ecography 33(4):698–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06405.x
Embling CB, Gillibrand PA, Gordon J, Shrimpton J, Stevick PT, Hammond PS (2010) Using habitat models to identify suitable sites for marine protected areas for harbour porpoises (phocoena phocoena). Biol Cons 143(2):267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.022
Embling CB, Illian J, Armstrong E, vander Kooij J, Sharples J, Camphuysen CJ, Scott BE (2012) Investigating fine-scale spatio-temporal predator-prey patterns in dynamic marine ecosystems: a functional data analysis approach. J Appl Ecol 49:481–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02092.x
Fernández R, MacLeod CD, Pierce GJ, Covelo P, López A, Torres-Palenzuela J, Valavanis V, Santos MB (2013) Inter-specific and seasonal comparison of the niches occupied by small cetaceans off north-west Iberia. Cont Shelf Res 64:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.05.002
Fontaine M (2016) Harbour porpoises, phocoena phocoena, in the mediterranean sea and adjacent regions: biogeographic relicts of the last glacial period. Adv Mar Biol 75:333–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2016.08.006
Fontaine MC, Roland K, Calves I, Austerlitz F, Palstra FP, Tolley KA et al (2014) Postglacial climate changes and rise of three ecotypes of harbor porpoises, phocoena phocoena, in western palearctic waters. Mol Ecol 23:3306–3321. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12817
Gilles A, Scheidat M, Siebert U (2009) Seasonal distribution of harbour porpoises and possible interference of offshore wind farms in the german north sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 383:295–307. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08020
Giralt Paradell O, Díaz López B, Methion S (2019) Modelling common dolphin (delphinus delphis) coastal distribution and habitat use: insights for conservation. Ocean Coast Manag 179:104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104836
Giralt Paradell O, Díaz López B, Methion S (2020) Food-web interactions in a coastal ecosystem influenced by upwelling and terrestrial runoff off north-west spain. Mar Environ Res 157:104933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104933
Giralt Paradell O, Methion S, Rogan E, Díaz López B (2021) Modelling ecosystem dynamics to assess the effect of coastal fisheries on cetacean species. J Environ Manage 1(265):112175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112175
Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Watson R (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319(5865):948–952. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149345
Hammond PS, Macleod K, Berggren P, Borchers DL, Burt ML, Cañadas A et al (2013) Cetacean abundance and distribution in european atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management. Biol Cons 164:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.010
Hammond PS, Bearzi G, Bjorge A, Forney KA, Karczmarski L, Kasuya T, Perrin W, Scott MD, Wang JY, Wells RS, Wilson B (2016) Phocoena Phocoena (Baltic Sea subpopulation) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species e.T17031A98831650.
Hammond PS, Lacey C, Gilles A, Viquerat S, Börjesson P, Herr H, et al. (2017) Estimates of Cetacean Abundance in European Atlantic Waters in Summer 2016 From the SCANS-III Aerial and Shipboard Surveys. Retrieved from: https://synergy.st-andrews.ac.uk/scans3/files/2017/05/SCANS-IIIdesign-based-estimates-2017-05-12-final-revised.pdf
Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, London
Howard C, Stephens PA, Pearce-Higgins JW, Gregory RD, Willis SG (2014) Improving species distribution models: the value of data on abundance. Methods Ecol Evol 5(6):506–513
Hoyt E (2011) Marine Protected Areas for Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises: A World Handbook for Cetacean Habitat Conservation and Planning, 2nd edn. Earthscan Oceans, New York, p 464
IJsseldijk LL, Camphuysen KC, Nauw JJ, Aarts G (2015) Going with the flow: tidal influence on the occurrence of the harbour porpoise (phocoena phocoena) in the marsdiep area, the netherlands. J Sea Res 103:129–137
Jones AR, Hosegood P, Wynn RB, De Boer MN, Butler-Cowdry S, Embling CB (2014) Fine-scale hydrodynamics influence the spatio-temporal distribution of harbour porpoises at a coastal hotspot. Prog Oceanogr 128:30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.08.002
Kindt-Larsen L, Glemarec G, Berg CW, Königson S, Kroner AM, Søgaard M, Lusseau D (2023) Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbor porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries. Proc R Soc B 290:20222570. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2570
Kyhn LA, Jørgensen PB, Carstensen J, Bech NI, Tougaard J, Dabelsteen T, Teilmann J (2015) Pingers cause temporary habitat displacement in the harbour porpoise (phocoena phocoena). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 526:253–265. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11181
Lewison RL, Crowder LB, Read AJ, Freeman SA (2004) Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends Ecol Evol 19(11):598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.004
Li J, Heap AD (2008) A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Geoscience Australia, Record 200823. Canberra, Australian Government, p 137
López A, Santos MB, Pierce GJ, González AF, Valeiras X, Guerra A (2002) Trends in strandings and by-catch of marine mammals in northwest spain during the 1990s. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 82:513–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315402005805
López A, Pierce GJ, Santos MB, Gracia J, Guerra A (2003) Fishery by-catches of marine mammals in galician waters: results from on-board observations and an interview survey of fishermen. Biol Cons 111:25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00244-6
López A, Pierce GJ, Valeiras X, Santos MB, Guerra A (2004) Distribution patterns of small cetaceans in galician waters. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84(1):283–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315404009166h
Maxwell SM, Hazen EL, Bograd SJ, Halpern BS, Breed GA, Nickel B, Teutschel NM, Crowder LB, Benson S, Dutton PH (2013) Cumulative human impacts on marine predators. Nat Commun 4:2688. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3688
Methion S, Díaz López B (2018) Abundance and demographic parameters of bottlenose dolphins in a highly affected coastal ecosystem. Mar Freshw Res 69:1355. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17346
Methion S, Díaz López B (2019a) Natural and anthropogenic drivers of foraging behaviour in bottlenose dolphins: influence of shellfish aquaculture. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 29:927–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3116
Methion S, Díaz López B (2019b) First record of atypical pigmentation pattern in fin whale (balaenoptera physalus) in the atlantic ocean. Dis Aquat Org 135:121–125. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03385
Methion S, Díaz López B (2020) Individual foraging variation drives social organization in bottlenose dolphins. Behav Ecol 31(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz160
Methion S, Díaz López B (2021) Spatial segregation and interspecific killing of common dolphins (delphinus delphis) by bottlenose dolphins (tursiops truncatus). Acta Ethologica 24(2):95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-021-00363-0
Methion S, Giralt Paradell O, Padín XA, Corrège T, Díaz López B (2023) Group size varies with climate and oceanographic conditions in bottlenose dolphins. Mar Biol 170:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-022-04154-4
Murray KT, Read AJ, Solow AR (2000) The use of time/area closures to reduce bycatches of harbour porpoises: lessons from the gulf of maine sink gillnet fishery. J Cetacean Res Manage 2(2):135–141
Nielsen NH, Teilmann J, Sveegard S, Hansen RG, Sinding MHS, Dietz R, Heid-Jørgensen MP (2018) Oceanic movements, site fidelity, and deep diving in harbour porpoises from greenland show limited similarities to animals from the north sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 597:259–272. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12588
Pérez FF, Padín XA, Pazos Y, Gilcoto M, Cabanas M, Pardo PC, Doval MD, Farina-Busto L (2010) Plankton response to weakening of the Iberian coastal upwelling. Glob Change Biol 16(4):1258–1267
Pierce GJ, Santos MB, Murphy S, Learmonth JA, Zuur AF, Rogan E, Bustamante P, Caurant F, Lahaye V, Ridoux V, Zegers BN (2008) Bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants in female common dolphins (delphinus delphis) and harbour porpoises (phocoena phocoena) from western european seas: geographical trends, causal factors and effects on reproduction and mortality. Environ Pollut 153(2):401–415
Pierce GJ, Caldas M, Cedeira J, Santos MB, Llavona A, Covelo P, Martinez G, Torres J, Sacau M, López A (2010) Trends in cetacean sightings along the galician coast, north–west spain, 2003–2007, and inferences about cetacean habitat preferences. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the UK 90(08):1547–1560
Pierce GJ, Weir C, Gutierrez P, Verutes G, Fontaine MC, Gonzalez AH et al. (2020) Is Iberian harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) threatened by interactions with fisheries? Paper Presented at the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission SC/68B/SM04 Rev2.
R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (http://www.Rproject.org/)
Scheidat M, Tougaard J, Brasseur S, Carstensen J, van Polanen Petel T, Teilmann J, Reijnders P (2011) Harbour porpoises (phocoena phocoena) and wind farms: a case study in the dutch north sea. Environ Res Lett 6(2):025102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/025102
Spanish Royal Decree 139/2011. Listado de Especies Silvestres en Régimen de Protección Especial y del Catálogo Español de Especies Amenazadas. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino «BOE» núm. 46, de 23 de febrero de 2011. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2011/BOE-A-2011-3582-consolidado.pdf
Spanish Royal Decree 150/2023. Aprobación de los planes de ordenación del espacio marítimo de las cinco demarcaciones marinas españolas. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico «BOE» núm. 54, de 28 de febrero de 2023. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2023/02/28/150/dof/spa/pdf
Spyrakos E, Santos-Diniz TC, Martinez-Iglesias G, Torres-Palenzuela JM, Pierce GJ (2011) Spatiotemporal patterns of marine mammal distribution in coastal waters of galicia, NW Spain. Hydrobiologia 670:87–109
Surís-Regueiro JC, Santiago JL (2014) Characterization of fisheries dependence in galicia (spain). Mar Policy 47:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.006
Teilmann J, Carstensen J (2012) Negative long-term effects on harbour porpoises from a large-scale offshore wind farm in the baltic—evidence of slow recovery. Environ Res Lett 7(4):045101
Thompson PM, Lusseau D, Barton T, Simmons D, Rusin J, Bailey H (2010) Assessing the responses of coastal cetaceans to the construction of offshore wind turbines. Mar Pollut Bull 60(8):1200–1208
Torres R, Barton ED, Miller P, Fanjul E (2003) Spatial patterns of wind and sea surface temperature in the galician upwelling region. J Geophys Res 108:3130. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001361
Torres-Pereira A, Ferreira M, Eira C, López A, Sequeira M (2023) ‘Phocoena phocoena boto’ In : Mathias ML (coord.), Fonseca C, Rodrigues L, Grilo C, Lopes-Fernandes M, Palmeirim JM, Santos-Reis M, Alves PC, Cabral JA, Ferreira M, Mira A, Eira C, Negrões N, Paupério J, Pita R, Rainho A, Rosalino LM, Tapisso JT, Vingada J (eds.) ‘Livro Vermelho dos Mamíferos de Portugal Continental’ FCiências.ID, ICNF, Lisboa
Tougaard J, Wright AJ, Madsen PT (2015) Cetacean noise criteria revisited in the light of proposed exposure limits for harbour porpoises. Mar Pollut Bull 90(1–2):196–208
van Beest FM, Kindt-Larsen L, Bastardie F, Bartolino V, Nabe-Nielsen J (2017) Predicting the population-level impact of mitigating harbor porpoise bycatch with pingers and time-area fishing closures. Ecosphere 8(4):e01785
van Berkel J, Burchard H, Christensen A, Mortensen LO, Petersen OS, Thomsen F (2020) The effects of offshore wind farms on hydrodynamics and implications for fishes. Oceanography 33(4):108–117
van den Heuvel-Greve MJ, van den Brink AM, Kotterman MJ, Kwadijk CJ, Geelhoed SC, Murphy S, van den Broek J, Heesterbeek H, Gröne A, IJsseldijk LL (2021) Polluted porpoises: generational transfer of organic contaminants in harbour porpoises from the southern north Sea. Sci Total Environ 796:148936
Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (b) 73(1):3–36
Zeileis A, Leisch F, Hornik K, Kleiber C (2002) An r package for testing for structural change in linear regression models. J Stat Softw 7(2):1–38 (http://www.jstatsoft.org/v07/i02/)
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14
Acknowledgements
This research forms part of a long-term study supported by funding from the Bottlenose Dolphin Research Institute (www.thebdri.com). We express our gratitude to Oriol Giralt Paradell, Sara Simoes, Olga Mosca, Nathalie Dunel Roig, Joyce Neves, and the dedicated BDRI volunteers for their invaluable contributions to our marine biodiversity research campaigns conducted from 2014 to 2021. The campaigns during the last 2 years (2020 and 2021) were conducted under the BALAENATUR project in collaboration with the Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge. We are also grateful for the annual authorizations provided by the Spanish Government, enabling our annual observation campaigns. Thank you to the editor and the two anonymous reviewers for contributions, which have enhanced the manuscript.
Funding
This research forms part of a long-term study supported by funding from the Bottlenose Dolphin Research Institute (www.thebdri.com).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Bruno Díaz López conceived the research idea. Bruno Díaz López and Séverine Methion obtained funding, designed the field study, and collected field data. Bruno Díaz López analyzed the data. Bruno Díaz López wrote the manuscript with input from Séverine Methion. Bruno Díaz López and Séverine Methion reviewed, read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Financial support:
This work was supported by funding from the Bottlenose Dolphin Research Institute (www.thebdri.com).
Consent for publication
All authors consent to publish.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V. Paiva .
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Díaz López, B., Methion, S. Habitat use by iberian harbour porpoises: ecological and human factors. Mar Biol 171, 113 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-024-04438-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-024-04438-x