Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental drivers of oceanic foraging site fidelity in central place foragers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finding food is crucial to the survival and reproductive success of individuals. Fidelity to previous profitable foraging sites may bring benefits to individuals as they can allocate more time to foraging rather than searching for prey. We studied how environmental conditions influence when lactating long-nosed fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) adopt a risky (low fidelity) or conservative (high fidelity) foraging strategy at two intra-annual temporal scales when foraging in a highly variable oceanic environment. Core foraging areas (CFAs; n = 534; 30 × 30 km cells) of consecutive foraging trips were obtained from geolocation tracks of 12 females from summer to winter in 2016 (n = 5) and 2017 (n = 7). We used the spatial variability (standard deviation) of CFAs between or among oceanic foraging trips as a proxy for individual foraging site fidelity (IFSF). Over the entire oceanic foraging period (n = 12), IFSF in the latitudinal axis increased with stronger sea-surface temperature gradient (SSTgrad), but decreased with greater SSTgrad and sea-surface height gradient variability. Over a period of two consecutive oceanic foraging trips (n = 66), IFSF decreased with greater SSTgrad variability in the earlier foraging trip. LNFS show evidence that they use IFSF as a strategy to potentially optimise food acquisition, and that this behaviour is influenced by mesoscale oceanographic parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported through grants from the Sea World Research and Rescue Foundation, the Holsworth Wildlife and Research Endowment, and the Lirabenda Endowment Fund (issued by the Field Naturalists Society of South Australia). We thank the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources for their logistical support. We are also deeply grateful for the volunteers who assisted us in the fieldwork. All animal handling and experimentation were undertaken with the approval from the Primary Industries and Regions South Australia animal ethics committee (application 32-12), Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (permit A24684) and the University of Tasmania animal ethics committee (permit A0015176). We thank the reviewers for their valuable feedback that helped to improve this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Sea World Research and Rescue Foundation (SWR/10/2016), the Holsworth Wildlife and Research Endowment (H0023641), and the Lirabenda Endowment Fund (issued by the Field Naturalists Society of South Australia; no Grant Number).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dahlia Foo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures, performed in studies involving animals, were in accordance to the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (University of Tasmania animal ethics approval permit number: A0015176).

Additional information

Responsible Editor: D.E. Crocker.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewed by B. Abrahms and undisclosed experts.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 2689 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 3543 kb)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 2311 kb)

Supplementary file4 (MP4 3428 kb)

Supplementary file5 (PDF 518 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foo, D., Hindell, M., McMahon, C. et al. Environmental drivers of oceanic foraging site fidelity in central place foragers. Mar Biol 167, 76 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03685-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03685-y

Navigation