Comparing the effects of different coloured artificial illumination on diurnal fish assemblages in the lower mesophotic zone

Birt, Matthew J.; Stowar, Marcus; Currey-Randall, Leanne M.; McLean, Dianne L.; Miller, Karen J.

doi:10.1007/s00227-019-3595-0

Short Note
Published: 11 November 2019

Comparing the effects of different coloured artificial illumination on diurnal fish assemblages in the lower mesophotic zone

Marine Biology volume 166, Article number: 154 (2019) Cite this article

557 Accesses
7 Citations
8 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

Artificial illumination is required when sampling with baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVS) in the lower mesophotic zone beyond ~ 90 m depth, yet little is known of how the choice of lighting influences fish assemblages and affects survey results in this zone. Here we use BRUVS equipped with the commonly used GoPro action camera to compare the composition and abundance of diurnal fish assemblages sampled under artificial Royal blue (~ 450 nm), Deep red (~ 660 nm) and natural day white light (~ 5600 K) in the lower mesophotic zone of the north-west shelf of Australia (19° 14.724′S 117° 20.286′E). No significant differences were detected in the fish assemblage composition or the number of species when surveyed using blue, red or white light at our study location. A greater mean total abundance of fish was observed using red light compared with white and blue light, however, individual species showed varied responses to the different light colours. When using consumer-grade action cameras such as GoPros, white light was shown to be far superior in image quality (and therefore ease of fish identification) compared to red and blue light. We recommend sampling diurnal mesophotic fish assemblages using a wavelength of light based on the survey objectives and the capabilities of the camera selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

Abesamis RA, Langlois T, Birt M, Thillainath E, Bucol AA, Arceo HO, Russ GR (2018) Benthic habitat and fish assemblage structure from shallow to mesophotic depths in a storm-impacted marine protected area. Coral Reefs 37:81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-017-1635-0
Article Google Scholar
Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Anderson MJ, Robinson J (2003) Generalized discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust N Z J Stat 45:301–318
Article Google Scholar
Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth
Google Scholar
Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Birt MJ, Harvey ES, Langlois TJ (2012) Within and between day variability in temperate reef fish assemblages: learned response to baited video. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 416–417:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.02.011
Article Google Scholar
Bond T, Partridge JC, Taylor MD, Cooper TF, Mclean L (2018) The influence of depth and a subsea pipeline on fish assemblages and commercially fished species. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207703
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cappo M, Harvey E, Malcolm H, Speare P (2003) Potential of video techniques to monitor diversity, abundance and size of fish in studies of marine protected areas. In: Beumer JP, Grant A, Smith DC (eds) Aquatic protected areas. What works best and how do we know? vol 1. University of Queensland, Queensland, pp 455–464
Google Scholar
Clarke KR, Gorley R (2006) Primer v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth
Google Scholar
Clarke TM, Whitmarsh SK, Fairweather PG, Huveneers C (2019) Overlap in fish assemblages observed using pelagic and benthic baited remote underwater video stations. Mar Freshw Res 70:870–880
Article Google Scholar
Fermin AC, Soronay GA (1997) Effects of different illumination levels on zooplankton abundance, feeding periodicity, growth and survival of the Asian sea bass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), fry in illuminated floating nursery cages. Aquaculture 157:227–237
Article Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick C, McLean D, Harvey ES (2013) Using artificial illumination to survey nocturnal reef fish. Fish Res 146:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.03.016
Article Google Scholar
Forward R (1988) Diel vertical migration: zooplankton photobiology and behaviour. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 26:361–393
Google Scholar
Harvey ES, Newman SJ, McLean DL, Cappo M, Meeuwig JJ, Skepper CL (2012a) Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for sampling tropical continental shelf demersal fishes. Fish Res 125–126:108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.01.026
Article Google Scholar
Harvey ES, Butler JJ, McLean DL, Shand J (2012b) Contrasting habitat use of diurnal and nocturnal fish assemblages in temperate Western Australia. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 426–427:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.05.019
Article Google Scholar
Langlois T, Williams J, Monk J, Bouchet P, Currey L, Goetze J, Harasti D, Huveneers C, Ierodiaconou D, Malcolm H, Whitmore S (2018) Marine sampling field manual for benthic stereo BRUVS (Baited Remote Underwater Videos). In: Przeslawski R, Foster S (eds) Field manuals for marine sampling to monitor Australian waters. National Environmental Science Programme (NESP), pp 82–104. https://www.nespmarine.edu.au/sites/default/files/_PUBLIC_/FieldManuals_NESPMarineHub_Chapter5_BRUV_v1.pdf
Levine JS, Macnichol EF Jr (1982) Color vision in fishes. Sci Am 246:140–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/24966528
Article Google Scholar
Marchesan M, Spoto M, Verginella L, Ferrero EA (2005) Behavioural effects of artificial light on fish species of commercial interest. Fish Res 73:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2004.12.009
Article Google Scholar
Myers E, Harvey E, Saunders B, Travers M (2016) Fine-scale patterns in the day, night and crepuscular composition of a temperate reef fish assemblage. Mar Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12336
Article Google Scholar
Raymond EH, Widder EA (2007) Behavioral responses of two deep-sea fish species to red, far-red, and white light. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 350:291–298. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07196
Article Google Scholar
Rocha LA, Pinheiro HT, Shepherd B, Papastamatiou YP, Luiz OJ, Rocha LA, Pyle RL, Bongaerts P (2018) Mesophotic coral ecosystems are threatened and ecologically distinct from shallow water reefs. Science 361:281–284. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1614
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rolim FA, Langlois T, Rodrigues PFC, Bond T, Motta S, Neves LM, Gadig OBF (2019) Network of small no-take marine reserves reveals greater abundance and body size of fisheries target species. PLoS ONE 14:1–22
Article Google Scholar
Von der Emde G, Mogdans J, Kapoor BG (2004) The senses of fish: adaptations for the reception of natural stimuli. Narosa Publishers, Boston
Book Google Scholar
Warrant EJ, Collin SP, Locket NA (2003) Eye design and vision in deep-sea fishes. In: Collin SP, Marshall NJ (eds) Sensory processing in aquatic environments. Springer, New York, NY, pp 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22628-6_16
Chapter Google Scholar
Whitmarsh SK, Fairweather PG, Huveneers C (2017) What is big BRUVver up to? Methods and uses of baited underwater video. Rev Fish Biol Fish 27:53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9450-1
Article Google Scholar
Whitmarsh SK, Fairweather PG, Huveneers C (2019) Lack of light colour effects when sampling fish at night in low visibility environments. J Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14058
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Widder EA, Robison BH, Reisenbichler KR, Haddock SHD (2005) Using red light for in situ observations of deep-sea fishes. Deep Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap 52:2077–2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2005.06.007
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was part of the Seabed Biodiversity and Habitats Research Theme within the North West Shoals to Shore Research Program, a collaboration between the Australian Institute of Marine Science and Santos (https://www.aims.gov.au/nw-shoals-to-shore/seabed-habitats-and-biodiversity). We would like to thank the master and crew of the RV Solander along with all other field support personnel. We would like to thank the two reviewers for their constructive revisions which improved this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Santos and the Australian Institute of Marine Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, 64 Fairway St, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
Matthew J. Birt, Marcus Stowar, Leanne M. Currey-Randall, Dianne L. McLean & Karen J. Miller

Authors

Matthew J. Birt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marcus Stowar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Leanne M. Currey-Randall
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dianne L. McLean
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Karen J. Miller
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Birt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Matthew Birt declares that he has no conflict of interest. Marcus Stowar declares that he has no conflict of interest. Leanne Currey-Randall declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dianne McLean declares that she has no conflict of interest. Karen Miller declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for sampling, care and experimental use of organisms for the study have been followed.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: C. Trueman.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewed by T. Letessier and an undisclosed expert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birt, M.J., Stowar, M., Currey-Randall, L.M. et al. Comparing the effects of different coloured artificial illumination on diurnal fish assemblages in the lower mesophotic zone. Mar Biol 166, 154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3595-0

Download citation

Received: 24 July 2019
Accepted: 21 September 2019
Published: 11 November 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3595-0