Skip to main content

Predictors of foraging plasticity by greater flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus) in intertidal soft sediments

Abstract

Numerous studies have emphasised the importance of apex predators in determining community dynamics and broader functioning in marine ecosystems. However, less understood is the ecology of plastic foraging behaviours employed by predators, with drivers of foraging plasticity being a particular knowledge gap in marine sediments. In June/July 2015, we assessed the role of traits and abundance of prey assemblages in influencing decisions made by greater flamingos Phoenicopterus roseus to employ different foraging behaviours in intertidal sandflat ecosystems in Langebaan Lagoon, on the west coast of South Africa (33°11′27″S, 18°07′37″E and 33°03′54″S, 17°58′07″E). Greater flamingos feed by either (1) creating pits, which involves flamingos stirring up deep sediments with their feet or (2) creating channels, in which their inverted bills are swept from side to side on the sediment surface. RandomForest modelling techniques indicated that both pit- and channel-foraging strategies were linked to low macrofaunal biomass in sediment patches, indicating that smaller prey items may be preferred targets for consumption. Channel foraging was linked mainly to the abundance of surface-associated fauna, suggesting that this feeding technique was predominantly a surficial foraging strategy. The probability of pit foraging increased with increasing concentrations of benthic microalgae, suggesting that high microalgal biomass may be linked to pit foraging. Overall, this study adds to knowledge on the role of flamingos as predators in marine sediments, by highlighting biotic predictors of foraging plasticity. The study demonstrates the relevance of understanding potential drivers of foraging plasticity in developing a predictive understanding of predator impacts in heterogeneous ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

(adapted from Pillay et al. 2010)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for the research was provided by the National Research Foundation (NRF). We thank the students of the Biological Sciences Department, University of Cape Town, for field and laboratory assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirti N. Gihwala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and/or institutional (University of Cape Town) guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Due to the observational nature of the study, animal ethics approval was not required.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: V. H. Paiva.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewed by undisclosed experts.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 543 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gihwala, K.N., Pillay, D. & Varughese, M. Predictors of foraging plasticity by greater flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus) in intertidal soft sediments. Mar Biol 166, 50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3497-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3497-1