Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 165:145 | Cite as

Behavioural responses to hydrostatic pressure in selected echinoderms suggest hyperbaric constraint of bathymetric range

  • Justine AmmendoliaEmail author
  • Jean-François Hamel
  • Annie Mercier
Original paper

Abstract

Although hydrostatic pressure is one of the most prominent abiotic drivers of faunal bathymetric ranges, it is one of the least understood. To better understand hyperbaric constraints on depth distributions, we explored responses to high pressure of adult echinoderms from eastern Canada. The sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, the sea star Leptasterias polaris and the sea cucumber Cucumaria frondosa were exposed to various pressures within and beyond their known bathymetric distribution (i.e. surface pressure; pressure at the midpoint in bathymetric distribution; pressure at twice the maximum depth in the species bathymetric distribution) for different durations (24 h, 72 h, 9 days). Survival was compromised by exposure to the highest pressure levels, with the sea urchin exhibiting the highest mortality. After 72-h exposure, mortality was observed for sea urchin and sea cucumber individuals while all sea star individuals survived. Following 9-day exposure of sea star individuals to high pressure, 100% mortality occurred. Exposure to pressures typical of natural distributions had little effect on the selected health and motor metrics. Pressures atypical of natural ranges negatively affected the motor functions of all species, irrespective of exposure duration. During and after 24-h exposure, feeding was reduced in sea urchin and sea cucumber individuals, but was unchanged in sea star individuals. Overall, there were no clear signs of acclimation to high pressure following sustained periods of exposure in any species. These results highlight constraints applied by hydrostatic pressure beyond current bathymetric ranges on life-sustaining behaviours in echinoderms. The potential of long-lived echinoderms to survive downward migration to greater depths is species-specific, suggesting there may be winners and losers in the face of near-future climate-driven migration patterns.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ocean Sciences Centre Field Services (Memorial University) for the animal collections and the two reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. We also extend our thanks to Gordon Nash and Stephen Hills for technical help with the IPOCAMP systems, as well as to Camilla Parzanini, Emy Montgomery, and Matt Osse for their invaluable support. This research was supported by Grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and the Research and Development Corporation (RDC) of Newfoundland and Labrador to Annie Mercier.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Ethical standards

All necessary international, national and institutional protocols for the care and use of animals were followed.

Supplementary material

227_2018_3399_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (333 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 334 kb)

References

  1. Abe T, Kakyo M, Tokui T, Nakagomi R, Nishio T, Nakai D, Nomura H, Unno M, Suzuki M, Naitoh T, Matsuno S, Yawo H (1999) Identification of a novel gene family encoding human liver-specific organic anion transporter LST-1. J Biol Chem 274(24):17159–17163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaro T, Witte H, Herndl GJ, Cunha MR, Billett DS (2009) Deep-sea bacterial communities in sediments and guts of deposit-feeding holothurians in Portuguese canyons (NE Atlantic). Deep Sea Res I 56(10):1834–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appelhans YS, Thomsen J, Opitz S, Pansch C, Melzner F, Wahl M (2014) Juvenile sea stars exposed to acidification decrease feeding and growth with no acclimation potential. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 509:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino-Souza R, Hawkins S, Tyler P (2008) Early development and larval survival of Psammechinus miliaris under deep-sea temperature and pressure conditions. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 88(3):453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balny C, Mozhaev VV, Lange R (1997) Hydrostatic pressure and proteins: basic concepts and new data. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 116(4):299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bett BJ, Malzone MG, Narayanaswamy BE, Wigham BD (2001) Temporal variability in phytodetritus and megabenthic activity at the seabed in the deep northeast Atlantic. Prog Oceanogr 50(1):349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowser-Riley F (1984) Mechanistic studies on the high pressure neurological syndrome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 304(1118):31–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brierley AS, Kingsford MJ (2009) Impacts of climate change on marine organisms and ecosystems. Curr Biol 19(14):602–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brodie B, Mowbray F, Power D (2013) DFO Newfoundland and Labrador region ecosystem trawl surveys. OBIS Canada digital collections. Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS, Canada. http://www.iobis.org/. Accessed 09 Aug 2014
  10. Brooke SD, Young CM (2009) Where do the embryos of Riftia pachyptila develop? Pressure tolerances, temperature tolerances, and buoyancy during prolonged embryonic dispersal. Deep Sea Res II 56(19):1599–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown A, Thatje S (2014) Explaining bathymetric diversity patterns in marine benthic invertebrates and demersal fishes: physiological contributions to adaptation of life at depth. Biol Rev 89(2):406–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown A, Thatje S (2015) The effects of changing climate on faunal depth distributions determine winners and losers. Glob Change Biol 21(1):173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown A, Thatje S (2018) NMDA receptor regulation is involved in the limitation of physiological tolerance to both low temperature and high hydrostatic pressure. Front Mar Sci 5:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown A, Thatje S, Morris JP, Oliphant A, Morgan EA, Hauton C, Jones DO, Pond DW (2017) Metabolic costs imposed by hydrostatic pressure constrain bathymetric range in the lithodid crab Lithodes maja. J Exp Biol 220(21):3916–3926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown A, Hauton C, Stratmann T, Sweetman A, van Oevelen D, Jones DO (2018) Metabolic rates are significantly lower in abyssal holothuroidea than in shallow-water holothuroidea. R Soc Open Sci 5(5):172162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Carney RS (2005) Zonation of deep biota on continental margins. Oceanogr Mar Biol 43:211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavey MJ, Märkel K (1994) Echinoidea. In: Harrison FW, China FS (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, Echinodermata. Wiley-Liss Inc, New York, pp 345–400Google Scholar
  18. Childress JJ (1995) Are there physiological and biochemical adaptations of metabolism in deep-sea animals? Trends Ecol Evol 10(1):30–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Company J, Sardà F (1998) Metabolic rates and energy content of deep-sea benthic decapod crustaceans in the western Mediterranean Sea. Deep Sea Res I 45(11):1861–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cottin D, Brown A, Oliphant A, Mestre NC, Ravaux J, Shillito B, Thatje S (2012) Sustained hydrostatic pressure tolerance of the shallow water shrimp Palaemonetes varians at different temperatures: insights into the colonisation of the deep sea. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 162(4):357–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. DFO (2009) State of the ocean: physical oceanographic conditions in the Newfoundland and Labrador region DFO (Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Advisory Report 2009/057)Google Scholar
  22. Ding J, Chang Y, Wang Z, Song J (2007) Polyploidy induction by hydrostatic pressure shock and embryo development of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 25:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dixon DR, Dixon LR, Shillito B, Gwynn JP (2002) Background and induced levels of DNA damage in Pacific deep-sea vent polychaetes: the case for avoidance. Cah Biol Mar 43(3/4):333–336Google Scholar
  24. Doney SC, Ruckelshaus M, Duffy JE, Barry JP, Chan F, English CA, Galindo HM, Grebmeier JM, Hollowed AB, Knowlton N (2012) Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Mar Sci 4:11–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doyle WL, McNiell GF (1964) The fine structure of the respiratory tree in Cucumaria. Q J Microsc Sci 3(69):7–11Google Scholar
  26. Ebert TA, Southon JR (2003) Red sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) can live over 100 years: confirmation with A-bomb 14carbon. Fish Bull NOAA 101(4):915–922Google Scholar
  27. Ellers O, Telford M (1992) Causes and consequences of fluctuating coelomic pressure in sea urchins. Biol Bull 182(3):424–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Feder HM (1963) Gastropod defensive responses and their effectiveness in reducing predation by starfishes. Ecology 44(3):505–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feder HM (1972) Escape responses in marine invertebrates. Sci Am 227:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferguson JC (1992) The function of the madreporite in body fluid volume maintenance by an intertidal starfish, Pisaster ochraceus. Biol Bull 183(3):482–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gage JD, Tyler PA (1991) Deep-sea biology: a natural history of organisms at the deep-sea floor. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gardiner SL, Rieger RM (1980) Rudimentary cilia in muscle cells of annelids and echinoderms. Cell Tissue Res 213(2):247–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gianasi BL, Verkaik K, Hamel J-F, Mercier A (2015) Novel use of PIT tags in sea cucumbers: promising results with the commercial species Cucumaria frondosa. PLoS One 10(5):e0127884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Graham MH, Kinlan BP, Druehl LD, Garske LE, Banks S (2007) Deep-water kelp refugia as potential hotspots of tropical marine diversity and productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(42):16576–16580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Harley CD, Randall Hughes A, Hultgren KM, Miner BG, Sorte CJ, Thornber CS, Rodriguez LF, Tomanek L, Williams SL (2006) The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecol Lett 9(2):228–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hazel JR, Williams EE (1990) The role of alterations in membrane lipid composition in enabling physiological adaptation of organisms to their physical environment. Prog Lipid Res 29(3):167–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hessler RR (1974) The structure of deep benthic communities from central oceanic waters. In: Miller CM (ed) The biology of the oceanic Pacific. Oregon State University Press, Princeton, pp 79–93Google Scholar
  38. Hochachka P, Somero G (1984) Temperature adaptation. Biochemical adaptation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 355–449Google Scholar
  39. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF (2010) The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science 328(5985):1523–1528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lawrence JM (1987) Functional biology of echinoderms. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. LeClair EE (1993) Effects of anatomy and environment on the relative preservability of asteroids: a biomechanical comparison. Palaios 8:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Macdonald AG (1972) The role of high hydrostatic pressure in the physiology of marine animals. Symp Soc Exp Biol 26:209–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Macdonald AG (1984) The effects of pressure on the molecular structure and physiological functions of cell membranes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 304(1118):47–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Macdonald A (1997) Hydrostatic pressure as an environmental factor in life processes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 116(4):291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Macdonald A, Gilchrist I (1978) Further studies on the pressure tolerance of deep-sea crustacea, with observations using a new high-pressure trap. Mar Biol 45(1):9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacDonald IR, Bluhm BA, Iken K, Gagaev S, Strong S (2010) Benthic macrofauna and megafauna assemblages in the arctic deep-sea Canada basin. Deep Sea Res II 57(1):136–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meidel S, Scheibling RE (1999) Effects of food type and ration on reproductive maturation and growth of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Mar Biol 134(1):155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mickel TJ, Childress J (1982a) Effects of pressure and pressure acclimation on activity and oxygen consumption in the bathypelagic mysid Gnathophausia ingens. Deep Sea Res Part A 29(11):1293–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mickel TJ, Childress JJ (1982b) Effects of pressure and temperature on the EKG and heart rate of the hydrothermal vent crab Bythograea thermydron (Brachyura). Biol Bull 162(1):70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miyake H, Kitada M, Tsuchida S, Okuyama Y, Nakamura K (2007) Ecological aspects of hydrothermal vent animals in captivity at atmospheric pressure. Mar Ecol 28(1):86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miyake H, Lindsay DJ, Kitada M, Nemoto S, Miwa T, Itoh T (2012) How to keep deep-sea animals. INTECH Open Access Publisher, TokyoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morris J, Thatje S, Ravaux J, Shillito B, Fernando D, Hauton C (2015a) Acute combined pressure and temperature exposures on a shallow-water crustacean: novel insights into the stress response and high pressure neurological syndrome. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 181:9–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Morris J, Thatje S, Cottin D, Oliphant A, Brown A, Shillito B, Ravaux J, Hauton C (2015b) The potential for climate-driven bathymetric range shifts: sustained temperature and pressure exposures on a marine ectotherm, Palaemonetes varians. R Soc Open Sci 2(11):150472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Morris JP, Thatje S, Ravaux J, Shillito B, Hauton C (2015c) Characterising multi-level effects of acute pressure exposure on a shallow-water invertebrate: insights into the kinetics and hierarchy of the stress response. J Exp Biol 218(16):2594–2602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. New P, Brown A, Oliphant A, Burchell P, Smith A, Thatje S (2014) The effects of temperature and pressure acclimation on the temperature and pressure tolerance of the shallow-water shrimp Palaemonetes varians. Mar Biol 161(3):697–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oliphant A, Thatje S, Brown A, Morini M, Ravaux J, Shillito B (2011) Pressure tolerance of the shallow-water caridean shrimp Palaemonetes varians across its thermal tolerance window. J Exp Biol 214(7):1109–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Perry AL, Low PJ, Ellis JR, Reynolds JD (2005) Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308(5730):1912–1915CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pond DW, Tarling GA, Mayor DJ (2014) Hydrostatic pressure and temperature effects on the membranes of a seasonally migrating marine copepod. PLoS One 9(10):e111043CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Pradillion F (2011) High hydrostatic pressure environments. In: Bell E (ed) Life at extremes: environments, organisms, and strategies for survival. CABI, Wallingford, pp 271–295Google Scholar
  60. Pradillon F, Gaill F (2007) Pressure and life: some biological strategies. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 6(1–3):181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pradillon F, Shillito B, Chervin J, Hamel G, Gaill F (2004) Pressure vessels for in vivo studies of deep-sea fauna. High Press Res 24(2):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ramsay K, Turner JR, Vize SJ, Richardson CA (2000) A link between predator density and arm loss in the starfish Marthasterias glacialis and Asterias rubens. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 80(3):565–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ramsay K, Bergmann M, Veale L, Richardson C, Kaiser M, Vize S, Feist S (2001) Damage, autotomy and arm regeneration in starfish caught by towed demersal fishing gears. Mar Biol 138(3):527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ravaux J, Gaill F, Le Bris N, Sarradin PM, Jollivet D, Shillito B (2003) Heat-shock response and temperature resistance in the deep-sea vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. J Exp Biol 206(14):2345–2354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ravaux J, Cottin D, Chertemps T, Hamel G, Shillito B (2009) Hydrothermal shrimps display low expression of heat-inducible hsp70 gene in nature. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 396:153–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robinson NJ, Thatje S, Osseforth C (2009) Heartbeat sensors under pressure: a new method for assessing hyperbaric physiology. High Press Res 29(3):422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rochette R, Hamel J-F, Himmelman JH (1994) Foraging strategy of the asteroid Leptasterias polaris: role of prey odors, current and feeding status. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ross DA, Hamel J-F, Mercier A (2013) Bathymetric and interspecific variability in maternal reproductive investment and diet of eurybathic echinoderms. Deep Sea Res II 94:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schlieper C (1968) High pressure effects on marine invertebrates and fishes. Mar Biol 2(1):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shillito B, Jollivet D, Sarradin P, Rodier P, Lallier F, Desbruyères D, Gaill F (2001) Temperature resistance of Hesiolyra bergi, a polychaetous annelid living on deep-sea vent smoker walls. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 216:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shillito B, Bris NL, Gaill F, Rees J, Zal F (2004) First access to live alvinellas. High Press Res 24(1):169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shillito B, Le Bris N, Hourdez S, Ravaux J, Cottin D, Caprais JC, Jollivet D, Gaill F (2006) Temperature resistance studies on the deep-sea vent shrimp Mirocaris fortunata. J Exp Biol 209(5):945–955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Shillito B, Ravaux J, Sarrazin J, Zbinden M, Sarradin P, Barthelemy D (2015) Long-term maintenance and public exhibition of deep-sea hydrothermal fauna: the AbyssBox project. Deep Sea Res II 121:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smithsonian Institution (1974) Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Research and Collections Information System, NMNH, Smithsonian Institution. http://www.mnh.si.edu/rc/db/collection_db_policy1.html. Accessed 09 Aug 2014
  75. So J, Hamel J-F, Mercier A (2010) Habitat utilisation, growth and predation of Cucumaria frondosa: implications for an emerging sea cucumber fishery. Fish Manag Ecol 17(6):473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sokolova IM (2013) Energy-limited tolerance to stress as a conceptual framework to integrate the effects of multiple stressors. Integr Comp Biol 53(4):597–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Somero G (1992) Biochemical ecology of deep-sea animals. Experientia 48(6):537–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Stasek CR (1967) Autotomy in the mollusca. Occas Pap Calif Acad Sci 61:1–44Google Scholar
  79. Swezey RR, Somero GN (1985) Pressure effects on actin self-assembly: interspecific differences in the equilibrium and kinetics of the G to F transformation. Biochemistry 24(4):852–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Takahashi K, Kubo T, Arai Y, Kitajima I, Takigawa M, Imanishi J, Hirasawa Y (1998) Hydrostatic pressure induces expression of interleukin 6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha mRNAs in a chondrocyte-like cell line. Ann Rheum Dis 57(4):231–236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Taylor J, Lovera C, Whaling P, Buck K, Pane E, Barry J (2014) Physiological effects of environmental acidification in the deep-sea urchin Strongylocentrotus fragilis. Biogeosciences 11(5):1413–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thatje S, Robinson N (2011) Specific dynamic action affects the hydrostatic pressure tolerance of the shallow-water spider crab Maja brachydactyla. Naturwissenschaften 98(4):299–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Thatje S, Casburn L, Calcagno JA (2010) Behavioural and respiratory response of the shallow-water hermit crab Pagurus cuanensis to hydrostatic pressure and temperature. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 390(1):22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thistle D (2003) The deep-sea floor: an overview. In: Tyler PA (ed) Ecosystems of the World. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 5–38Google Scholar
  85. Tyler P, Dixon D (2000) Temperature/pressure tolerance of the first larval stage of Mirocaris fortunata from lucky strike hydrothermal vent field. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 80(4):739–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tyler P, Young C (1998) Temperature and pressure tolerances in dispersal stages of the genus Echinus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): prerequisites for deep-sea invasion and speciation. Deep Sea Res II 45(1):253–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tyler PA, Young CM, Clarke A (2000) Temperature and pressure tolerances of embryos and larvae of the antarctic sea urchin Sterechinus neumayeri (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): potential for deep-sea invasion from high latitudes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 192:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. VandenSpiegel D, Jangoux M (1987) Cuvierian tubules of the holothuroid Holothuria forskali (Echinodermata): a morphofunctional study. Mar Biol 96(2):263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Verkaik K, Hamel J-F, Mercier A (2016) Carry-over effects of ocean acidification in a cold-water lecithotrophic holothuroid. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 557:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Villalobos FB, Tyler PA, Young CM (2006) Temperature and pressure tolerance of embryos and larvae of the Atlantic seastars Asterias rubens and Marthasterias glacialis (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): potential for deep-sea invasion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 314:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wessel GM, Fresques T, Kiyomoto M, Yajima M, Zazueta V (2014) Origin and development of the germ line in sea stars. Genesis 52(5):367–377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilcock S, Wann K, Macdonald A (1978) The motor activity of Crangon crangon subjected to high hydrostatic pressure. Mar Biol 45(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. WoRMS Editorial Board (2014) World register of marine species. http://www.marinespecies.org. Accessed 09 Aug 2014
  94. Yoshiki T, Yamanoha B, Kikuchi T, Shimizu A, Toda T (2008) Hydrostatic pressure-induced apoptosis on nauplii of Calanus sinicus. Mar Biol 156(2):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Young CM, Tyler PA (1993) Embryos of the deep-sea echinoid Echinus affinis require high pressure for development. Limnol Oceanogr 38(1):178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Young CM, Vázquez E, Metaxas A, Tyler PA (1996) Embryology of vestimentiferan tube worms from deep-sea methane/sulphide seeps. Nature 381(6582):514–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Young C, Tyler P, Fenaux L (1997) Potential for deep sea invasion by Mediterranean shallow water echinoids: pressure and temperature as stage-specific dispersal barriers. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 154:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justine Ammendolia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-François Hamel
    • 2
  • Annie Mercier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ocean SciencesMemorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.Society for Exploration and Valuing of the EnvironmentPortugal Cove-St. PhilipsCanada

Personalised recommendations