Costs of epibionts on Antarctic sea spiders

Abstract

Nearly all marine animals harbor epibionts, organisms living on their body surfaces. The positive or negative effects that epibionts have on their hosts depend on many factors, including the size and location of the epibionts on their host. The present study examined the effects of epibionts on gas exchange, locomotion, and drag of three species of Antarctic sea spiders (pycnogonids). Sea spiders are a cosmopolitan group of marine arthropods that lack gills and rely instead on the diffusion of oxygen directly across their cuticle. Encrusting epibionts, such as bryozoans and algae, had only minor effects on surface oxygen levels, but they reduced the functional diffusion coefficient of oxygen through the cuticle by about half. Although these effects are significant locally and may be severe in individuals with high coverage by epibionts, the total coverage on most individuals was not high enough to significantly alter oxygen fluxes into the animal. Macroepibionts, such as barnacles, had no effect on host walking speeds, but they increased by two-to-threefold the drag experienced by host sea spiders. This likely increases the energetic costs of walking and increases the chance of being dislodged by high currents. These results suggest that epibionts can impose diverse costs to their hosts but only in subtle ways that depend on total epibiont coverage of the host and rates of water flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Photo credit to SJL and Timothy Dwyer

Fig. 2

References

  1. Arnaud F, Bamber RN (1987) The biology of Pycnogonida. Adv Mar Biol 24:1–96

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avolio C, Shine R, Pile AJ (2006) The adaptive significance of sexually dimorphic scale rugosity in sea snakes. Am Nat 167:728–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Botton ML (2009) The ecological importance of horseshoe crabs in estuarine and coastal horseshoe crabs in estuarine and coastal communities: a review and speculative summary. In: Tanacredi JT, Botton ML, Smith D (eds) Biology and conservation of horseshoe crabs. Springer, USA, pp 45–63

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burnett LE, Holman JD, Jorgensen DD, Ikerd JL, Burnett KG (2006) Immune defense reduces respiratory fitness in Callinectes sapidus, the Atlantic blue crab. Biol Bull 211:50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buschbaum C, Reise K (1999) Effects of barnacle epibionts on the periwinkle Littorina littorea (L.). Helgol Mar Res 53:56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christie AO, Dalley R (1987) Barnacle fouling and its prevention. In: Southward AJ (ed) Barnacle biology. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 419–433

    Google Scholar 

  7. Core Team R (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (Online)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davenport J, Blackstock N, Davies DA, Yarrington M (1987) Observations on the physiology and integumentary structure of the Antarctic pycnogonid Decolopoda australis. J Zool 211:451–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dejours P (1981) Principles of comparative respiratory physiology. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, p 265

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denny MW (1993) Air and water: the biology and physics of life’s media. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 341

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eschweiler N, Buschbaum C (2011) Alien epibiont (Crassostrea gigas) impacts on native periwinkles (Littorina littorea). Aquat Inv 6(3):281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gannon AT, Wheatly MG (1992) Physiological effects of an ectocommensal gill barnacle, Octolasmis muelleri, on gas exchange in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. J Crustacean Biol 12:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garner YL, Litvaitis MK (2017) Effects of artificial epibionts on byssogenesis, attachment strength, and movement in two size classes of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Invertebr Biol 136(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon I (1932) Pycnogonida. Discov Rep 6:1–138

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hedrick TL (2008) Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim 3:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson BE, Evangelista DJ, Ray DD, Hedrick TL (2016) 3D for the people: multi-camera motion capture in the field with consumer-grade cameras and open source software. Biol Open 5:1334–1342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeffries WB, Voris HK, Yang CM (1982) Diversity and distribution of the pedunculate barnacle Octolasmis in the seas adjacent to Singapore. J Crustacean Biol 2:562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Key MM Jr, Jeffries WB, Voris HK, Yang CM (1996) Epizoic bryozoans, horseshoe crabs, and other mobile benthic substrates. Bull Mar Sci 58:368–384

    Google Scholar 

  19. Key MM Jr, Knauff JB, Barnes DKA (2013) Epizoic bryozoans on predatory pycnogonids from the South Orkney Islands, Antarctica: “If you can’t beat them, join them fouled pycnogonids from Antarctica”. In: Ernst A, Schäfer P, Scholz J (eds) Bryozoan studies 2010. Lecture notes in earth system sciences, vol 143. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 137–153

    Google Scholar 

  20. King PE (1973) Pycnogonids. Hutchinson, London, p 144

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lane SJ, Shishido CM, Moran AL, Tobalske BW, Woods HA (2016) No effects and no control of epibionts in two species of temperate pycnogonids. Biol Bull 230:165–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lane SJ, Shishido CM, Moran AL, Tobalske BW, Arango CP, Woods HA (2017) Upper limits to body size imposed by respiratory–structural trade-offs in Antarctic pycnogonids. Proc R Soc B 284:20171779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lane SJ, Moran AL, Shishido CM, Tobalske BW, Woods HA (2018) Cuticular gas exchange by Antarctic sea spiders. J Exp Biol 221:177568. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.177568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lau WWY, Martinez MM (2003) Getting a grip on the intertidal: flow microhabitat and substratum type determine the dislodgement of the crab Pachygrapsus crassipes (Randall) on rocky shores and in estuaries. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 295:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez MM (1996) Issues for aquatic pedestrian locomotion. Am Zool 36:619–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moran AL, Woods HA, Shishido CM, Lane SJ, Tobalske BW (2018) Predatory behavior of giant Antarctic sea spiders (Colossendeis) in nearshore environments. Invertebr Biol 137:116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pipe AR (1982) Epizoites on marine invertebrates: with particular reference to those associated with the pycnogonid Phoxichilidium tubulariae Lebour, the amphipod Caprella linearis (L.) and the decapod Corystes cassivelaunus (Pennant). Chem Ecol 1:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poulter R, Oliver PG, Hauton C, Sanders T, Ciotti BJ (2017) Infestation of shore crab gills by a free-living mussel species. Mar Biodiv 48:1241–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rasband WS (2014) ImageJ. US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (Online)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Scholnick DA, Burnett KG, Burnett LE (2006) Impact of exposure to bacteria on metabolism in the penaeid shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Biol Bull 211:44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seaborn T (2014) Limpets and their algal epibionts: costs and benefits of Acrosiphonia spp and Ulva lactuca growth. J Mar Biol 2014:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shine R, Brischoux F, Pile AJ (2010) A seasnake’s colour affects its susceptibility to algal fouling. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:2459–2464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas F, Poulin R, de Meeüs T, Guégan JF, Renaud F (1999) Parasites and ecosystem engineering: what roles could they play? Oikos 84:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wahl M (1996) Fouled snails in flow: potential of epibionts on Littorina littorea to increase drag and reduce snail growth rates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 138:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wahl M (1997) Increased drag reduces growth of snails: comparison of flume and in situ experiments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 151:291–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wahl M (2008) Ecological lever and interface ecology: epibiosis modulates the interactions between host and environment. Biofouling 24:427–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wahl M, Lafargue F (1990) Marine epibiosis. II. Reduced fouling on Polysyncraton lacazei (Didemnidae, Tunicata) and proposal of an antifouling potential index. Oecologia 82:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Watling L, Thiel M (2013) Functional morphology and diversity, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Whitley E, Ball J (2002) Statistics review 6: nonparametric methods. Crit Care 6:509–513

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Witman JD, Suchanek TH (1984) Mussels in flow: drag and dislodgement by epizoans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 16:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Woods HA, Moran AL (2008) Oxygen profiles in egg masses predicted from a diffusion-reaction model. J Exp Biol 211:790–797. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.014613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff at McMurdo Station for technical support. Special thanks to Rob Robbins, Steve Rupp, and Timothy Dwyer for SCUBA support. In addition, we thank two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation Grant PLR-1341485 to HAW and BWT and PLR-1341476 to ALM.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Lane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Additional information

Reviewed by undisclosed experts.

Responsible Editor: F. Weinberger.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 179 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lane, S.J., Tobalske, B.W., Moran, A.L. et al. Costs of epibionts on Antarctic sea spiders. Mar Biol 165, 137 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3389-9

Download citation