Comparison of the rookery connectivity and migratory connectivity: insight into movement and colonization of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) in Pacific–Southeast Asia
Integration of the rookery connectivity, which includes historical connections among rookeries, and migratory connectivity assessing dispersal or migratory routes of marine animals are important for understanding dispersal and/or migration and its effect on the formation of genetic population structure. The migratory nature and long-distance movement of sea turtles have been reported, while natal philopatry has been suggested by genetic differentiation among rookeries within a relatively narrow geographic scale. Therefore, we hypothesize that contemporary long-distance movement has a limited effect on colonization in new rookeries. This study compared the genetic relationships among rookeries and between the rookeries and foraging grounds of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Southeast Asia. Mitochondrial control region sequences of 333 turtles from 11 rookeries were newly determined, and combination with previously reported Indo-Pacific rookeries indicated the presence of a genetic barrier in the Torres Strait and Celebes Sea (i.e. Philippines–Sulawesi). On the other hand, an analysis of newly collected 107 turtles from seven foraging sites and mixed stock analyses indicated contemporary movement across this historical genetic barrier, from Micronesian rookeries to foraging grounds in the Celebes Sea (i.e. Sipadan Island and Tun Sakaran Marine Park). Isolation by distance was generally supported for relationships among rookeries, and the high migratory connectivity did not result in a lower genetic distance between rookeries than predicted from geographic distance. Differences between rookery connectivity and migratory connectivity in green turtles in Southeast Asia are likely due to migration to natal regions after long-distance movement.
We thank the Department of Fisheries, Malaysia (Terengganu, Pahang, Johor, Melaka, Penang, and Perak), Department of Marine Parks Malaysia, Sabah Parks, Sabah Wildlife Department, Sarawak Forestry Department, Sarawak Forestry Corporation, and the Malaysian National Security Council for approving the sampling permits in Malaysia. The collection of samples in Sabah and Sarawak would not have been possible without help from the staff of Sabah Parks and Sarawak Forestry Corporation, respectively. We acknowledge the use of the Maptool from SEATURTLE.ORG to create the maps in this paper. We finally thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Sampling permits for this research were: Sabah Parks (TS/PTD/5/4 Jld. 35 and TS/PTD/5/4 Jld. 49), Sabah Wildlife Department (JHL.600-6/1/2 Jld.6), Malaysian National Security Council (MKN [R] 269/2 Jld.26 ), Sarawak (NCCD.907.4.4 [Jld. 9]—67, NCCD.907.4.4 [Jld.10]—181 and Park Permit 142/2014) and Peninsular Malaysia (JTLM 620-2/1/1 and Prk.ML.34/18 Jld 26).
- Abreu-Grobois FA, Horrocks J, Formia A, Leroux R, Velez-Zuazo X, Dutton P, Soares L, Meylan P, Browne D (2006) New d-loop primers which work for a variety of marine turtle species may increase the resolution capacity of mixed stock analyses. In: Presentation at the 26th annual symposium on sea turtle biology and conservation, Crete, Greece, 2–8 AprilGoogle Scholar
- Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
- Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research, InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695. http://igraph.org. Accessed 3 Apr 2017
- Dutton PH, Jensen MP, Frey A, LaCasella E, Balazs GH, Zárate P, Chassin-Noria O, Sarti-Martinez AL, Velez E (2014a) Population structure and phylogeography reveal pathways of colonization by a migratory marine reptile (Chelonia mydas) in the central and eastern Pacific. Ecol Evol 4:4317–4331PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eaton C, McMichael E, Witherington B, Foley A, Hardy R, Meylan A (2008) In-water sea turtle monitoring and research in Florida: Review and recommendations. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-38, FloridaGoogle Scholar
- Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois FA, Donnelly M (1999) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication no. 4, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Hijmans RJ (2016) Geosphere: spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere. Accessed 15 Apr 2017
- IUCN (2016) The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2016-3. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 14 May 2017
- Joseph J (2006) Conservation genetics of green (Chelonia mydas) and hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea turtles of Southeast Asia. Dissertation, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
- Joseph J, Nishizawa H (2016) Genetic structure and diversity of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) from two rookeries in the South China Sea. J Sustain Sci Manag 11:41–47Google Scholar
- Klain S, Eberdong J, Kitalong A, Yalap Y, Matthews E, Eledui A, Morris M, Andrew W, Albis D, Kemesong P (2007) Linking Micronesia and Southeast Asia: Palau sea turtle satellite tracking and flipper tag returns. Mar Turt Newsl 118:9–11Google Scholar
- Koenker R (2016) Quantreg: quantile regression. R package version 5.21. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=quantreg. Accessed 8 May 2017
- Kolinski SP, Cruce J, Parker DM, Balazs GH, Clarke R (2014) Migrations and conservation implications of post-nesting green turtles from Gielop Island, Ulithi Atoll, Federated States of Micronesia. Micronesica 2014–04:1–9Google Scholar
- Kuhnt W, Holbourn A, Hall R, Zuvela M, Käse R (2004) Neogene history of the Indonesian Throughflow. In: Clift P, Kuhnt W, Wang P, Hayes D (eds.) Continent-ocean interactions within East Asian Marginal Seas. Geophysical monograph series, vol 149, pp 299–320Google Scholar
- Limpus CJ, Reed PC (1985) The green turtle, Chelonia mydas in Queensland: a preliminary description of the population structure in a corals reef feeding ground. In: Grigg G, Shine RR, Ehmann H (eds.) Biology of australasian frogs and reptiles. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, pp 47–52Google Scholar
- Moritz C, Broderick D, Dethmers K, FitzSimmons N, Limpus C (2002) Population genetics of Southeast Asian and Western Pacific green turtles, Chelonia mydas. Final Report to UNEP/CMSGoogle Scholar
- Nishizawa H, Naito Y, Suganuma H, Abe O, Okuyama J, Hirate K, Tanaka S, Inoguchi E, Narushima K, Kobayashi K, Ishii H, Tanizaki S, Kobayashi M, Goto A, Arai N (2013) Composition of green turtle feeding aggregations along the Japanese archipelago: implications for changes in composition with current flow. Mar Biol 160:2671–2685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pella J, Masuda M (2001) Bayesian methods for analysis of stock mixtures from genetic characters. Fish Bull 99:151–167Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 3 Apr 2017
- Read TC, FitzSimmons NN, Wantiez L, Jensen MP, Keller F, Chateau O, Farman R, Werry J, MacKay KT, Petro G, Limpus CJ (2015) Mixed stock analysis of a resident green turtle, Chelonia mydas, population in New Caledonia links rookeries in the South Pacific. Wildlife Res 42:488–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar