Diel feeding rhythms in marine microzooplankton: effects of prey concentration, prey condition, and grazer nutritional history
In this study, we aim at disentangling the causes and consequences of diel feeding rhythms in marine microzooplankton. We focused on the diel feeding activity of two heterotrophic dinoflagellate species, Gyrodinium dominans (one laboratory strain) and Oxyrrhis marina (laboratory cultivated and wild strains). We observed higher ingestion during the day in both dinoflagellate species. Feeding rhythms appeared to be independent of circadian changes in prey biochemical composition. Grazers fed with prey under stationary phase, with equivalent stoichiometric composition between day and night, showed 5 (G. dominans) and 10 (O. marina) times higher ingestion rates during the day. Previous grazer feeding history (starved vs well-fed) did not affect the feeding rhythm. However, prey concentration altered the rhythm; food limiting conditions reduced the amplitude of the rhythms. Our results establish a resource dependence of diel periodicity in microzooplankton grazing, which can have unanticipated consequences for standard field dilution grazing experiments.
We are grateful to Kaiene Griffell for technical assistance in culture maintenance and help during the experimental trails.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was funded by project FERMI (CGL2014-59227-R; MINECO/FEDER, UE). Anna Arias was funded with a FPI fellowship (BES-2015-074092) from the MINECO of Spain.
Conflict of interest
Anna Arias, Enric Saiz and Albert Calbet declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Bollens S (1996) Diel vertical migration in zooplankton: trade-offs between predators and food. Oceanus 39(1):19–20Google Scholar
- Christoffersen K (1994) Variations of feeding activities of heterotrophic nanoflagellates on picoplankton. Mar Microb Food Web 8:11–123Google Scholar
- Edmunds LN (1988) Cellular and molecular bases of biological clocks: models and mechanisms for circadian timekeeping. Springer, Berlin, p 497Google Scholar
- Goodman DK (1987) Dinoflagellate cysts in ancient marine and modern marine sediments. In: Taylor FJR (ed) The biology of dinoflagellates. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 649–722Google Scholar
- Heuschele J, Ceballos S, Borg CM, Bjærke O, Isari S, Lasley-Rasher R, Lindehoff E, Souissi A, Souissi S, Titelman J (2014) Non-consumptive effects of predator presence on copepod reproduction: insights from a mesocosm experiment. Mar Biol 161(7):1653–1666. doi: 10.1007/s00227-014-2449-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Margalef R (1978) Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment. Oceanol Acta 1(4):493–509Google Scholar
- Neveux, J, Dupouy C, Blanchot J, Le Bouteiller A, Landry MR, Brown SL (2003) Diel dynamics of chlorophylls in high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll waters of the equatorial Pacific (180 °): interactions of growth, grazing, physiological responses, and mixing. J Geophys Res Ocean 108(C12). doi: 10.1029/2000JC000747
- Peruyeva YG (1977) Some experimental data on the fourth copepodid stage of Calanus glacialis Jaschnov. Quantitative composition of the food. Oceanology 17:587–590Google Scholar
- Prézelin BB (1992) Diel periodicity in phytoplankton productivity. In: Berman T, Gons HJ, Mur LR (eds) The daily growth cycle of phytoplankton. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 1–35Google Scholar
- Stearns D (1983) Control of nocturnal vertical migration in the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa Dana in the Newport River Estuary, North Carolina. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Zoology, Duke University, p 360Google Scholar
- Tiselius P, Hansen B, Jonsson P, Kiørboe T, Nielsen TG, Piontkovski S, Saiz E (1995) Can we use laboratory-reared copepods for experiments? A comparison of feeding behaviour and reproduction between a field and a laboratory population of Acartia tonsa. ICES J Mar Sci J Conseil 52(3–4):369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar