How does a restored oyster reef develop? An assessment based on stable isotopes and community metrics
Oyster reefs host complex food webs, as their three-dimensional biogenic structure provides habitat for a diverse range of invertebrates and fish. Oyster reefs have suffered severe degradation due to anthropogenic activities. Restoration projects aim to mitigate this habitat loss. We compared the development of a restored subtidal oyster reef to that of a natural reef for 29 months by assessing (1) community metrics (e.g., biomass, diversity), (2) the stable isotope composition of food sources and consumers, and (3) biomass-weighted isotopic diversity indices. A clear shift in restored reef community composition occurred 12–15 months after restoration, moving from a community dominated by opportunistic species to a more diverse and evenly distributed community, similar to that of the natural reef. Consumer stable isotope values indicated that the restored reef community was supported by similar food resources and had similar food chain length as the natural reef community by 5-month post-restoration. However, biomass-weighted isotopic diversity indices indicated that the magnitude of the main trophic pathways and characteristics of food web complexity in the restored reef did not recover to natural reef levels until 12–15 months after construction. The functional recovery of the restored reef community was driven by the homogenization of biomass distribution among trophic compartments as oysters and top predators increasingly colonized the reef. Results indicate that oyster reef restoration can support food web functions like those provided by natural reefs. We also demonstrate the importance of combining food web and community structure information in the study of ecological functioning.
KeywordsShell Height Suspension Feeder Oyster Reef Natural Reef Suspend Particulate Organic Matter
Funding for this project was provided by FishAmerica Foundation and the NOAA Community-Based Restoration Program (Grant No. FAF-11030), the Texas General Land Office Coastal Management Program, and The Ruth Campbell Fellowship at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. The authors gratefully acknowledge Patrick Graham, Kevin De Santiago, Eric White, Gaël Guillou, and Dr. Paula Rose for their assistance in the field and the laboratory, Dr. Kim Withers for assistance with species identification, and Dr. Blair Sterba-Boatwright for statistical guidance. We also thank four anonymous reviewers for providing insights and suggestions that greatly improved the quality of this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Armstrong NE (1987) The ecology of open-bay bottoms of Texas: a community profile. Fish and Wildlife Service No. FWS-8, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Baggett LP, Powers SP, Brumbaugh RD, Coen LD, DeAngelis BM, Greene JK, Hancock BT, Morlock SM, Allen BL, Breitburg DL, Bushek D, Grabowski JH, Grizzle RE, Grosholz ED, La Peyre MK, Luckenbach MW, McGraw KA, Piehler MF, Westby SR, zu Ermgassen PSE (2015) Guidelines for evaluating performance of oyster habitat restoration. Restor Ecol 23:737–745. doi: 10.1111/rec.12262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Blomberg BN (2015) Evaluating success of oyster reef restoration. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, Corpus ChristiGoogle Scholar
- Brind’Amour A, Dubois SF (2013) Isotopic diversity indices: how sensitive to food web structure? PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084198
- Canty A, Ripley B (2016) Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R Package version 1.3–18Google Scholar
- Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- Coen L, Luckenbach M, Breitburg D (1999) The role of oyster reefs as essential fish habitat: a review of current knowledge and some new perspectives. Fish Habitat Essent Fish Habitat Rehabil 22:438–454Google Scholar
- Dinno A (2016) Dunn.test: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R package version 1.3.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test. Accessed June 2016
- Duffy JE (2003) Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 6:680–687. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00494.x
- Harding J, Mann R (2001) Oyster reefs as fish habitat: opportunistic use of restored reefs by transient fishes. J Shellfish Res 20:951–959Google Scholar
- Hoellein TJ, Zarnoch CB, Grizzle RE (2015) Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) filtration, biodeposition, and sediment nitrogen cycling at two oyster reefs with contrasting water quality in Great Bay Estuary (New Hampshire, USA). Biogeochemistry 122:113–129. doi: 10.1007/s10533-014-0034-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Layman CA, Arrington DA, Montaña CG, Post DM (2007) Can stable isotope ratios provide for community wide measures of trophic structure? Ecology 88:42–48. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[42:CSIRPF]2.0.CO;2
- Lebreton B, Beseres Pollack J, Blomberg B, Palmer TA, Adams L, Guillou G, Montagna PA (2016) Origin, composition and quality of suspended particulate organic matter in relation to freshwater inflow in a South Texas estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 170:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.12.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lehnert RL, Allen DM (2002) Nekton use of subtidal oyster shell habitat in a Southeastern U.S. estuary. Estuaries 25:1015–1024. doi: 10.1007/BF02691348
- Lefebvre S, Marín Leal JC, Dubois S, et al (2009) Seasonal dynamics of trophic relationships among co-occurring suspension-feeders in two shellfish culture dominated ecosystems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 82:415–425. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.02.002
- Martínez del Río C, Wolf B (2005) Mass-balance models for animal isotopic ecology. Science Publishers, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
- McGlaun K, Withers K (2012) Metabolism, consumption rates, and scope for growth of porcelain crab (Petrolisthes galathinus). Gulf Mex Sci 30:1–6Google Scholar
- Newell RIE (2004) Ecosystem influences of natural and cultivated populations of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs: a review. J Shellfish Res 23:51–61Google Scholar
- NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) (2016) System-wide monitoring program. Data accessed from the NOAA NERRS Centralized Data Management Office. http://www.nerrsdata.org/. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
- Powers S, Peterson C, Grabowski J, Lenihan H (2009) Success of constructed oyster reefs in no-harvest sanctuaries: implications for restoration. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 389:159–170. doi: 10.3354/meps08164
- R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org
- Soniat TM, Ray SM, Jeffrey LM (1984) Components of the seston and possible available food for oysters in Galveston Bay, Texas. Contrib Mar Sci 27:127–141Google Scholar
- Zimmerman RJ, Minello TJ, Baumer T, Castiglione MC (1989) Oyster reef as habitat for estuarine macrofauna. NOAA technical memorandum, NMFS-SEFC-249Google Scholar