Anemonefish personalities influence the strength of mutualistic interactions with host sea anemones
The anemone–anemonefish mutualism is one of the most iconic marine mutualisms. For decades, anemonefishes have been known to protect anemones from predators, while anemones provide safe havens for anemonefishes. More recently, it has been suggested that the number of anemonefish influences the survival, growth, and asexual reproduction of anemones. Here, we build on those findings, investigating the effect of four variables (fish number, fish biomass, fish shyness, and anemone colony area), on anemone growth and asexual reproduction. The interaction between Amphiprion percula and Entacmaea quadricolor was used as a tractable system in a controlled aquarium setting. Fish and anemones were monitored in 60 tanks for 18 months, and we recorded all variables at 6-month intervals. We performed single-measure analyses and found that fish shyness, defined as the time spent in the vicinity of the anemone, significantly predicts anemone growth over the entire experiment. Further, we performed repeated-measure analyses and found that both fish shyness and initial anemone colony area significantly predict anemone growth per time period. These data suggest that behavioral variation among individual fish may be an important driver of anemone growth. More generally, this study highlights the importance of behavioral traits in mediating the strength of interspecific interactions such as mutualisms and suggests that such effects should be accounted for when investigating the dynamics of interacting populations.
KeywordsAsexual Reproduction Fish Biomass Fish Number Host Anemone Anemone Size
This research was made possible by the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program at Boston University and a start-up grant awarded to Peter Buston from the Trustees of Boston University. We thank John Majoris and Tina Barbasch for helpful feedback. In addition, we would like to thank Jeremiah Seymour, Alissa Rickborn, Arianna Medina, Diana Acosta, Derek Scolaro, Athbah Almuhairi, Cara Martone, Linda Wong, Jarrod Moore, and Andrew Lacqua for helping with various aspects of this project in the laboratory.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
- Allen GR (1972) The Anemonefishes: their classification and biology, 2nd edn. TFH Publications, Neptune CityGoogle Scholar
- Bronstein JL (2009) Mutualism and symbiosis. In: Levin SA (ed) The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, pp 233–238. doi: 10.1515/9781400833023.233
- Buston PM (2002) Group structure of the clown anemonefish Amphiprion percula. Dissertation, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Darwin CD (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fautin DG (1991) The anemonefish symbiosis: what is known and what is not. Symbiosis 10:23–46Google Scholar
- Fautin DG, Allen GR (1997) Anemone fishes and their host sea anemones. Western Australian Museum, PerthGoogle Scholar
- Lomnicki A (1988) Population ecology of individuals. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Nelson JS, Chou LM, Phang VPE (1994) Pigmentation variation in the anemonefish Amphiprion ocellaris (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): type, stability and its usefulness for individual identification. Raffles Bull Zool 42:927–930Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/