Marine Biology

, 164:17 | Cite as

Diving behavior and thermal habitats of gravid hawksbill turtles at St. Croix, USA

  • Jacob E. Hill
  • Nathan J. Robinson
  • Courtney M. King
  • Frank V. Paladino
Original paper


Knowledge of an animal’s behavior during particular life history stages can provide insights into habitat selection, and this can have important conservation implications. Gravid hawksbill turtles spend the internesting interval resting on the seafloor, but their diving behavior has only been previously examined in shallow-water habitats. We examined depth use of gravid hawksbills in a location of variable bathymetry to determine if hawksbills engage in deeper diving if deeper waters are available. We attached archival time-depth recorders onto hawksbills nesting at Sandy Point National Wildlife Refuge, St. Croix, US Virgin Islands, where the neritic zone ends within 500 m of the shoreline. We recorded seven internesting intervals from five individuals. Internesting intervals were characterized by long dives (mean 24.2 ± SD 22.3 min) to a constant depth, consistent with seafloor resting in a spatially restricted residence area. There was little variation in the water temperatures at all depths occupied (mean 29.06 ± SD 0.43 °C). Two turtles attained the deepest recorded dives for gravid hawksbills (95.1 and 84.4 m) and sometimes remained at depths greater than 60 m for up to 30 min. Although we recorded instances of relatively deep diving for the species, the overall pattern of seafloor resting and infrequent diving was consistent with hawksbills in other ocean basins with different offshore habitats. We propose that benthic resting is common behavior for gravid hawksbills globally, and protection of benthic habitats near the nesting beach should be a management priority.


Green Turtle Benthic Habitat Bottom Phase Diving Behavior Dive Depth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank Mike Evans and Claudia Lombard of the US Fish and Wildlife Service for logistical support and assistance in obtaining permits (USFWS Special Use Permits 41526-2013-003 and 41526-2012-004, VI DPNR Endangered Species Research Permit STX-031-12). Brian Daley and Jen Valiulis of Geographic Consulting, LLC also aided in the logistics of working on St. Croix. Field assistance was provided by Jake Bryan, Justin Whisante, Scott Perry, Liz Zimmer, Molly Clifford, and Donna Boles. This study was funded by a grant from the Lerner Gray Marine Research Fund, The Leatherback Trust, and by the Schrey Chair in Biology at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. Research methods were approved by the Purdue Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol 1206000656).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights disclosure

All applicable national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.


  1. Bell IP, Parmenter CJ (2008) The diving behavior of inter-nesting hawksbill turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus 1766), on Milman Island reef, Queensland, Australia. Herpetol Conserv Biol 3:254–263Google Scholar
  2. Blanco GS, Morreale SJ, Vélez E, Piedra R, Montes WM, Paladino FV, Spotila JR (2012) Reproductive output and ultrasonography of an endangered population of East Pacific green turtles. J Wildl Manag 76:841–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanco GS, Morreale SJ, Seminoff JA, Paladino FV, Piedra R, Spotila JR (2013) Movements and diving behavior of internesting green turtles along Pacific Costa Rica. Integr Zool 8:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumenthal J, Austin TJ, Bell CDL, Bothwell JB, Broderick AC, Ebanks-Petrie G, Gibb JA, Luke KE, Olynik JR, Orr MF, Solomon JL, Godley BJ (2009) Ecology of hawksbill turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata, on a western Caribbean foraging ground. Chelonian Conserv Biol 8:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambault P, de Thoisy B, Kelle L, Berzins R, Bonola M, Delvaux H, Le Maho Y, Chevallier D (2016) Inter-nesting behavioural adjustments of green turtles to an estuarine habitat in French Guiana. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 555:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crouse DT, Crowder LB, Caswell H (1987) A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaos AR, Lewison RR, Wallace BP, Yañez IL, Liles MJ, Baquero A, Seminoff JA (2012) Dive behaviour of adult hawksbills (Eretmochelys imbricata, Linnaeus 1766) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean highlights shallow depth use by the species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 432:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garner J, Garner S (2007) Tagging and nesting research of leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) on Sandy Point St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. West Indian Marine Animal Research Service. Annual Report to US Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  9. Garner J, Garner S, Coles W (2006) Tagging and nesting research of leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) on Sandy Point St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. West Indian Marine Animal Research Service. Annual Report to US Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  10. Hays G, Adams CR, Broderick AC, Godley BJ, Lucas DJ, Metcalfe JD, Prior AA (2000) The diving behaviour of green turtles at Ascension Island. Anim Behav 59:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hazel J, Lawler IR, Hamann M (2009) Diving at the shallow end: green turtle behaviour in near-shore foraging habitat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 371:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heithaus M, Frid A, Dill L (2002) Shark-inflicted injury frequencies, escape ability, and habitat use of green and loggerhead turtles. Mar Biol 140:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heithaus MR, Frid A, Wirsing AJ, Dill LM, Fourqurean JW, Burkholder D, Thomson J, Bejder L (2007) State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem. J Anim Ecol 76:837–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill J (2016) Eretmochelys imbricata: Fishing Gear Mortality. Herpetol Rev 47:284Google Scholar
  15. Houghton JD, Broderick AC, Godley BJ, Metcalfe JD, Hays GC (2002) Diving behaviour during the internesting interval for loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) nesting in Cyprus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 227:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Houghton JD, Callow MJ, Hays GC (2003) Habitat utilization by juvenile hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata, Linnaeus, 1766) around a shallow water coral reef. J Nat Hist 37:1269–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Houghton JD, Cedras A, Myers AE, Liebsch N, Metcalfe JD, Mortimer JA, Hays GC (2008) Measuring the state of consciousness in a free-living diving sea turtle. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 356:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hubbard DK (1989) The shelf-edge reefs of Davis and Cane Bays, Northwestern St. Croix, USVI. In: Hubbard DK (ed) Terrestrial and marine geology of St. Croix, US Virgin Islands. Special publication no. 8. West Indies Laboratory St. Croix, US Virgin Islands, pp 167–179Google Scholar
  19. Killick R, Eckley I (2014) Changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J Stat Softw 58:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luque SP (2007) Diving behavior analysis in R. R News 7:8–14Google Scholar
  21. Lutz P, Bergey A, Bergey M (1989) Effects of temperature on gas exchange and acid-base balance in the sea turtle Caretta caretta at rest and during routine activity. J Exp Biol 144:155–169Google Scholar
  22. McMahon C, Bradshaw C, Hays G (2007) Satellite tracking reveals unusual diving characteristics for a marine reptile, the olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 329:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okuyama J, Kataoka K, Kobayashi M, Abe O, Yoseda K, Arai N (2012) The regularity of dive performance in sea turtles: a new perspective from precise activity data. Anim Behav 84:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patel SH, Morreale SJ, Panagopoulou A, Bailey H, Robinson NJ, Paladino FV, Margaritoulis D, Spotila JR (2015) Changepoint analysis: a new approach for revealing animal movements and behaviors from satellite telemetry data. Ecosphere 6:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rostal DC, Robeck TR, Owens DW, Kraemer DC (1990) Ultrasound imaging of ovaries and eggs in Kemp’s Ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempi). J Zoo Wildl Med 21:27–35Google Scholar
  26. Seminoff JA, Jones T, Marshall GJ (2006) Underwater behaviour of green turtles monitored with video-time-depth recorders: what’s missing from dive profiles? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 322:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shea D (2010) Hawksbill sea turtle dies in illegal gillnet near Frederiksted. Virgin Islands daily news. Accessed 1 Mar 2015
  28. Shea D (2011) DPNR downplays shark sightings off Frederiksted beach. Virgin Islands daily news. Accessed 1 Mar 2015
  29. Starbird CH, Hillis-Starr Z, Harvey JT, Eckert SA (1999) Internesting movements and behavior of hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) around Buck Island Reef National Monument, St. Croix, U. S. Virgin Islands. Chelonian Conserv Biol 3:237–243Google Scholar
  30. Storch S (2004) The behaviour of immature and female hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) at sea. Dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-UniversitätGoogle Scholar
  31. Storch S, Wilson RP, Hillis-Starr Z-M, Adelung D (2005) Cold-blooded divers: temperature-dependent dive performance in the wild hawksbill turtle Eretmochelys imbricata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walcott J, Eckert S, Horrocks J (2012) Tracking hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) during inter-nesting intervals around Barbados. Mar Biol 159:927–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walcott J, Eckert S, Horrocks J (2013) Diving behaviour of hawksbill turtles during the inter-nesting interval: strategies to conserve energy. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 448:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walcott J, Eckert S, Oxenford H, Horrocks J (2014) Use of a towed camera system to investigate benthic habitat use by inter-nesting female hawksbill sea turtles. Endanger Species Res 24:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallace BP, Williams CL, Paladino FV, Morreale SJ, Lindstrom RT, Spotila JR (2005) Bioenergetics and diving activity of internesting leatherback turtles Dermochelys coriacea at Parque Nacional Marino Las Baulas, Costa Rica. J Exp Biol 208:3873–3884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Young R (1992) Tiger shark consumes young sea turtle. MTN 59:14Google Scholar
  37. Zbinden JA, Aebischer A, Margaritoulis D, Arlettaz R (2007) Insights into the management of sea turtle internesting area through satellite telemetry. Biol Conserv 137:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob E. Hill
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nathan J. Robinson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Courtney M. King
    • 4
  • Frank V. Paladino
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyIndiana University-Purdue University Fort WayneFort WayneUSA
  2. 2.Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Forest and Wildlife Research CenterMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  3. 3.The Leatherback TrustPlaya GrandeCosta Rica
  4. 4.Department of BiologyMiami UniversityOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations