Abstract
Sea urchins are important drivers of nearshore benthic communities. Understanding their critical life history characteristics such as age structure and mortality requires accurate and reliable estimates of growth. The green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, occurs on both sides of the northern Pacific and Atlantic oceans and can play a key role in stable state shifts from urchin barrens to kelp bed communities. A recent study of these systems in Norway used growth zones, or bands, in the skeletal ossicles (interambulacral plates) of green urchins as chronometers—estimators of age. Combined with measures of size, the age estimates were used to construct growth curves, population age structures, and estimates of site-specific mortality. However, there is much confusion surrounding the aging technique in regard to skeletal growth, ossicle selection, and misinterpretations of previous validation studies. Our comment clarifies these issues using data from the Norway study and two published validation studies. In addition, we provide criteria for assessing whether sea urchin ossicles are accurate and valid chronometers. Given the limited understanding of endogenous and exogenous causes of different types of bands, ontogenetic variation, intra- and interspecific variation, and a paucity of detailed information about their chemical composition, at least at this time, bands should not be used to determine age in sea urchins.
References
Asnaghi V, Mangialajo L, Gattuso JP, Francour P, Privitera D, Chiantore M (2014) Effects of ocean acidification and diet on thickness and carbonate elemental composition of the test of juvenile sea urchins. Mar Environ Res 93:78–84. doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.08.005
Berkes F, Hughes TP, Steneck RS, Wilson JA, Bellwood DR, Crona B, Folke C, Gunderson LH et al (2006) Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 311:1557–1558. doi:10.1126/science.1122804
Blicher ME, Rysgaard S, Sejr MK (2007) Growth and production of sea urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in a high-Arctic fjord, and growth along a climatic gradient (64 to 77 N). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 341:89–102. doi:10.3354/meps341089
Brey T, Pearse J, Basch L, McClintock J, Slattery M (1995) Growth and production of Sterechinus neumayeri (Echinoidea: Echinodermata) in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Mar Biol 124:279–292. doi:10.1007/BF00347132
Campana S (2001) Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. J Fish Biol 59:197–242. doi:10.1006/jfbi.2001.1668
Fagerli CW, Stadniczeñko SG, Pedersen MF, Christie H, Fredriksen S, Norderhaug KM (2015) Population dynamics of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in kelp forests and barren grounds in Norway. Mar Biol 162:1215–1226. doi:10.1007/s00227-015-2663-3
Fritts HC (1976) Tree rings and climate. Academic Press, London
Jackson RT (1899) Localized stages in development in plants and animals. Mem Boston Soc Nat Hist 5:89–153
Jensen M (1969) Age determination of echinoids. Sarsia 37:41–44
Jones DS (1983) Sclerochronology: reading the record of the molluscan shell. Am Sci 71:384–391
Knutson DW, Buddemeier RW, Smith SV (1972) Coral chronometers: seasonal growth bands in reef corals. Science 177:270–272. doi:10.1126/science.177.4045.270
Lang C, Mann KH (1976) Changes in sea urchin populations after the destruction of kelp beds. Mar Biol 36:321–326. doi:10.1007/BF00389193
Miller RJ, Mann KH (1973) Ecological energetic of the seaweed zone in a marine bay on the Atlantic coast of Canada. III. Energy transformations by sea urchins. Mar Biol 18:99–114. doi:10.1007/BF00348685
Narváez CN, Johnson LE, Sainte-Marie B (2016) Growth bands are an unreliable indicator of sea urchin age: evidence from the laboratory and the literature. Limnol Oceanogr Methods. doi:10.1002/lom3.10110
Pearse JS, Pearse VB (1975) Growth zones in the echinoid skeleton. Am Zool 15:731–753. doi:10.1093/icb/15.3.731
Robinson SMC, MacIntyre AD (1997) Aging and growth of the green sea urchin. Bull Aquac Assoc Can 97:56–60
Russell MP (2001) Spatial and temporal variation in growth of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, in the Gulf of Maine, USA. In: Barker M, Balkema AA (eds) Proceedings of the tenth international echinoderm conference, pp 533–538
Russell MP, Meredith RW (2000) Natural growth lines in echinoid ossicles are not reliable indicators of age: a test using Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Invertebr Biol 119:410–420. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7410.2000.tb00111.x
Siversten K, Hopkins CCE (1995) Demography of the echinoid Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis related to biotope in northern Norway. In: Skjoldal HR, Hopkins C, Erikstad KE, Leinaas HP (eds) Ecology of fjords and coastal waters. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 549–571
Smith AB (1984) Echinoid palaeobiology: special topics in palaeontology. Unwin Hyman, London and Boston
Steneck R (2013) Sea urchins as drivers of shallow benthic marine community structure. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Sea urchins: biology and ecology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 195–212. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-396491-5.00014-9
Strathmann MF (1987) Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific Coast. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Vadas RL, Beal BF (1999) Temporal and spatial variability in the relationships between adult size, maturity and fecundity in green sea urchins: the potential use of a roe-yield standard as a conservation tool. Report to Maine Department of Marine Resources, Augusta, ME, p 47
Vadas RL, Smith BD, Beal B, Dowling T (2002) Sympatric growth morphs and size bimodality in the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis). Ecol Monogr 72:113–132. doi:10.2307/3100088
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC—project #396880-10), Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the Biology Department of Villanova. We benefitted from discussions with T. A. Ebert, L. Johnson, R. Meredith, and B. Sainte-Marie as well as comments from J. Pearse, P. Gagnon, and an anonymous reviewer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: P. Gagnon.
Reviewed by J. Pearse and an undisclosed expert.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, M.P., Narváez, C.A. Skeletal ossicles in echinoids are unreliable chronometers: Comment on “Population dynamics of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in kelp forests and barren grounds in Norway” (Fagerli et al. 2015). Mar Biol 163, 159 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-016-2925-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-016-2925-8