A predator has nonconsumptive effects on different life-history stages of a prey
- 309 Downloads
Through a field experiment, we show that a predator has negative nonconsumptive effects (NCEs) on different life-history stages of the same prey species. Shortly before the recruitment season of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides (May–June), we established experimental cages in rocky intertidal habitats in Nova Scotia, Canada. The cages were used to manipulate the presence and absence of dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus, the main predators of barnacles. At the centre of each cage, we installed a tile where barnacle pelagic larvae could settle and the resulting recruits grow. Mesh prevented caged dogwhelks from accessing the tiles, but allowed waterborne dogwhelk cues to reach the tiles. Results in May indicated that barnacle larvae settled preferentially on tiles from cages without dogwhelks. In November, at the end of the dogwhelk activity period and once the barnacle recruits had grown to adult size, barnacle body mass was lower in the presence of dogwhelks. This limitation may have resulted from a lower barnacle feeding activity with nearby dogwhelks, as found by a previous study. The observed larval and adult responses in barnacles are consistent with attempts to decrease predation risk. November data also indicated that dogwhelk cues limited barnacle reproductive output, a possible consequence of the limited growth of barnacles. Overall, this study suggests that a predator species might influence trait evolution in a prey species through NCEs on different life-history stages.
KeywordsPredation Risk Prey Species Reproductive Output Lively 1986a Adult Barnacle
We thank Patrick Comtois for field assistance, Werner Schnepf, Steven MacDonald, and David Risk for laboratory assistance, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. Funds were provided by grants awarded to R. Scrosati by the Canada Research Chairs Program (CRC; Grant Number 210283), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI; Grant Number 202034), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC, Discovery Grant Number 311624) and by Ph.D. scholarships awarded to J. Ellrich by the Stiftung für Kanada-Studien (SKS, Scholarship Number T191/19833) and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, scholarship number D/10/47054). This study is part of the Ph.D. dissertation of J. Ellrich, supervised by R. Scrosati and M. Molis and registered at the University of Bremen, Germany.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare to have no conflicts of interest.
- Barnes M (1999) The mortality of intertidal cirripedes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 37:153–244Google Scholar
- Bousfield EL (1954) The distribution and spawning seasons of barnacles on the Atlantic coast of Canada. Bull Natl Mus Canada 132:112–154Google Scholar
- Carriker MR (1981) Shell penetration and feeding in naticacean and muricacean predatory gastropods: a synthesis. Malacologia 20:403–422Google Scholar
- Crothers JH (1985) Dog-whelks: an introduction into the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.). Field Stud 6:291–360Google Scholar
- Denno RF, Lewis D (2009) Predator–prey interactions. In: Levin SA (ed) The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 202–212Google Scholar
- DFO (2015) Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Oceanography and scientific data branch: database of oceanographic data. http://www.meds-sdmm.dfo-mpo.gc.ca. Accessed 30 July 2015
- Holt RD (2009) Predation and community organization. In: Levin SA (ed) The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 274–281Google Scholar
- Jenkins SR, Åberg P, Cervin G, Coleman RA, Delany J, Della Santina P, Hawkins SJ, LaCroix E, Myers AA, Lindegarth M, Power AM, Roberts MF, Hartnoll RG (2000) Spatial and temporal variation in settlement and recruitment of the intertidal barnacle Semibalanus balanoides (L.) (Crustacea: Cirripedia) over a European scale. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 243:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kats LB, Dill LM (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Écoscience 5:361–364Google Scholar
- Lively CM (1999) Developmental strategies in spatially variable environments: barnacle shell dimorphisms and strategic models of selection. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 245–258Google Scholar
- NASA (2015) National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Ocean color radiometry online visualization and analysis. http://gdata1.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/daac-bin/G3/gui.cgi?instance_id=ocean_month. Accessed 30 July 2015
- Rainbow PS (1984) An introduction to the biology of British littoral barnacles. Field Stud 6:1–51Google Scholar
- Strauss SY (2014) Adaptation to the biotic environment. In: Losos JB (ed) The Princeton guide to evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 298–303Google Scholar