Marine Biology

, Volume 162, Issue 8, pp 1625–1635 | Cite as

Thermogeographic variation in body size of Carcinus maenas, the European green crab

  • Amanda L. Kelley
  • Catherine E. de Rivera
  • Edwin D. Grosholz
  • Gregory M. Ruiz
  • Sylvia Behrens Yamada
  • Graham Gillespie
Original Paper

Abstract

Populations that span a large geographic range often experience a thermal gradient that can differentially affect the phenotypic response of individuals across the population. Variation in temperature has been shown to affect the final adult size of ectotherms, which is referred to as the temperature–size rule for ectotherms. Body size is a fundamentally important trait, as it can impact physiological performance, fecundity, longevity, and macroecological patterns. Hence, temperature may affect body size across a range, which can in turn influence maintenance of populations and ecological interactions. Here, we test whether biogeographic differences in size (carapace width) exist for a recent invasion of the non-native European green crab, Carcinus maenas, along the west coast of North America. We assembled trapping and temperature data collected from 10 sites along the western North American coast over a 5-year period. We also conducted a literature review of C. maenas size across their native range. Our results indicate that adult body size shows negative correlation with environmental temperature in both the native and invaded ranges, conforming to the temperature–size rule for ectotherms. Given the short time since colonization and lack of evident genetic structure across the invasive range, it may be that phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental temperature is driving this relationship. Forces that shape the phenotypic trajectory of species may play an important role in both invasion dynamics and subsequent ecological impacts.

Supplementary material

227_2015_2698_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (6 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 6 kb)
227_2015_2698_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (159 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 158 kb)
227_2015_2698_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (296 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 295 kb)

References

  1. Ameyaw-Akumfi C, Naylor E (1987) Spontaneous and induced components of salinity preference behaviour in Carcinus maenas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 37:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anger KE, Spivak E, Luppi T (1998) Effects of reduced salinities on development and bioenergetics of early larval shore crab, Carcinus maenas. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angilletta MJ Jr, Dunham AE (2003) The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am Nat 162:332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton KG, Tracy MC, de Queiroz A (2000) Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? Am Nat 156:390–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson D (1994) Temperature and organism size—a biological law for ectotherms? Advances in Ecological Research, vol 25. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–58Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson D (1996) Ectotherm life-history responses to developmental temperature. In: Animals and temperature: phenotypic and evolutionary adaptation. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson D, Sibly RM (1997) Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol Evol 12:235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldridge AK, Smith LD (2008) Temperature constraints on phenotypic plasticity explain biogeographic patterns in predator trophic morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 365:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behrens Yamada SB, Dumbauld BR, Kalin A, Hunt CE, Figlar-Barnes R, Randall A (2005) Growth and persistence of a recent invader Carcinus maenas in estuaries of the northeastern Pacific. Biol Invasion 7:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benton MJ (2002) Cope’s rule. In: Encyclopedia of evolution. Oxford University Press, pp185–186Google Scholar
  11. Berke SK, Jablonski D, Krug AZ, Roy K, Tomasovych A (2013) Beyond Bergmann’s rule: size—latitude relationships in marine Bivalvia world-wide. Global Ecol Biogeogr 22(2):173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Loder N (1999) Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers Distrib 5(4):165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blueweiss LF, Kudzma H, Nakashima VD, Peters R, Sams S (1978) Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia 37:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonner JT (1988) The evolution of complexity by means of natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein Breteler WCM (1975) Laboratory experiments on the influence of environmental factors on the frequency of moulting and the increase in size at moulting of juvenile shore crabs, Carcinus maenas. Netherlands. J Sea Res 9:100–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Broekhuysen GJ (1936) On development, growth, and distribution of Carcinus maenas. Arch Neerlandaises de Zool 2:257–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown JH, Maurer BA (1986) Body size, ecological dominance and Cope’s rule. Nature 324:248–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burmeister A, Sainte-Marie B (2010) Pattern and causes of a temperature-dependent gradient of size at terminal moult in snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) along West Greenland. Polar Biol 33:775–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chase JM (1999) To grow or to reproduce? The role of life-history plasticity in food web dynamics. Am Nat 154:571–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen AN, Carlton JT, Fountain MC (1995) Introduction, dispersal and potential impacts of the green crab Carcinus maenas in San Francisco Bay, California. Mar Biol 122:225–237Google Scholar
  21. Darling JA, Bagley MJ, Roman JO, Tepolt CK, Geller JB (2008) Genetic patterns across multiple introductions of the globally invasive crab genus Carcinus. Mole Ecol 17:4992–5007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. David JR, Gibert P, Gravot E, Petavy G, Morin JP, Karan D, Moreteau B (1997) Phenotypic plasticity and developmental temperature in Drosophila: analysis and significance of reaction norms of morphometrical traits. J Thermal Biol 22:441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. deRivera CE, Hitchcock N, Teck S, Steves BP, Hines AH, Ruiz GM (2007) Larval development rate predicts range expansion of an introduced crab. Mar Biol 150:1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eriksson S, Edlund AM (1977) On the ecological energetics of 0-group Carcinus maenas (L.) from a shallow sandy bottom in Gullmar Fjord, Sweden. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 30(3):233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ernst B, Orensanz JM, Armstrong DA (2005) Spatial dynamics of female snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) in the eastern Bering Sea. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62(2):250–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillespie GE, Phillips AC, Paltzat DL, Therriault TW (2007) Status of the European green crab, Carcinus maenas, in British Columbia, 2006. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science Branch, Pacific Region, Pacific Biological StationGoogle Scholar
  27. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (1996) Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab Carcinus maenas. Biol Conserv 78:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (2003) Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates. Ecol Lett 6:700–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hines A (1982) Allometric constraints and variables of reproductive effort in brachyuran crabs. Mar Biol 69:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hines A (1988) Fecundity and reproductive output in two species of deep-sea crabs, Geryon fenneri and G. quinquedens (Decapoda: Brachyura). J Crust Biol 8:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hines A (1989) Geographic variation in size at maturity in brachyuran crabs. Bull Mar Sci 45:356–368Google Scholar
  32. Hone DWE, Benton MJ (2005) The evolution of large size: how does Cope’s Rule work? Trends Ecol Evol 20:4–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnston IA, Bennett F (1996) Animals and temperature: phenotypic and evolutionary adaptation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelley AL (2014) The role thermal physiology plays in species invasion. Conserv Physiol 2(1):cou045. doi:10.1093/conphys/cou045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelley AL, de Rivera CE, Buckley BA (2011) Intraspecific variation in thermotolerance and morphology of the invasive European green crab, Carcinus maenas, on the west coast of North America. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 409:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelley AL, de Rivera CE, Buckley BA (2013) Cold tolerance of the invasive Carcinus maenas in the east Pacific: molecular mechanisms and implications for range expansion in a changing climate. Biol Invasion 15(10):2299–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Macpherson E, Duarte CM (1994) Patterns in species richness, size, and latitudinal range of East Atlantic fishes. Ecography 17:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGaw IJ, Naylor E (1992) Salinity preference of the shore crab Carcinus maenas in relation to coloration during intermoult and to prior acclimation. J Exp Mari Biol Ecol 1552:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGaw IJ, Edgell TC, Kaiser MJ (2011) Population demographics of native and newly invasive populations of the green crab Carcinus maenas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 430:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McQuaid CD, Lindsay JR, Lindsay TL (2000) Interactive effects of wave exposure and tidal height on population structure of the mussel Perna perna. Mar Biol 137:925–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Menge BA (1972) Competition for food between two intertidal Starfish species and its effect on body Size and feeding. Ecology 53(4):635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mohamedeen H, Hartnoll RG (1990) Larval and postlarval growth of individually reared specimens of the common shore crab Carcinus maenas (L). J Exp Mari Biol Ecol 134:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moksnes PO (2004) Interference competition for space in nursery habitats: density-dependent effects on growth and dispersal in juvenile shore crabs Carcinus maenas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 281:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morin M, Pétavy D (1999) Divergence of reaction norms of size characters between tropical and temperate populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. J Evol Biol 12:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Naganuma KH, Roughgarden JD (1990) Optimal body size in Lesser Antillean Anolis Lizards—a mechanistic approach. Ecol Monogr 60:239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nijhout HF, Davidowitz G, Roff DA (2006) A quantitative analysis of the mechanism that controls body size in Manduca sexta. J Biol 5:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nunney L, Cheung W (1997) The effect of temperature on body size and fecundity in female Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for adaptive plasticity. Evolution 51:1529–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norry FM, Loeschcke V (2002) Temperature-induced shifts in associations of longevity with body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 56(2):299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orensanz JL, Ernst B, Armstrong DA (2007) Variation of female size and stage at maturity in snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) (Brachyura: Majidae) from the eastern Bering Sea. J Crust Biol 27(4):576–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Partridge L, French V (1996) Thermal evolution of ectotherm body size: why get big in the cold. In: Animals and temperature: phenotypic and evolutionary adaptation. Cambridge University Press, pp 265–293Google Scholar
  51. Partridge L, Fowler K, Vernon F (1994) Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 48:1269–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  54. Riessen HP (1999) Predator-induced life history shifts in Daphnia: a synthesis of studies using meta-analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2487–2494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  56. Sato T, Seiji G (2007) Effects of risk of sperm competition, female size, and male size on number of ejaculated sperm in the stone crab Hapalogaster dentata. J Crust Biol 27:570–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sheridan JA, Bickford D (2011) Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change. Nat Clim Change 1:401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shirley SM, Shirley TC, Rice SD (1987) Latitudinal variation in the Dungeness crab, Cancer magister: zoeal morphology explained by incubation temperature. Mar Biol 95:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Somerton DA (1981) Regional variation in the size of maturity of two species of tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi and C. opilio) in the eastern Bering Sea, and its use in defining management subareas. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38(2):163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Speakman JR (2005) Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan. J Exp Biol 208:1717–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tepolt CK, Darling JA, Bagley MJ, Geller JB, Blum MJ, Grosholz ED (2009) European green crabs Carcinus maenas in the northeastern Pacific: genetic evidence for high population connectivity and current-mediated expansion from a single introduced source population. Diver Distrib 15:997–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Torchin M, Lafferty K, Kuris A (2001) Release from parasites as natural enemies: increased performance of a globally introduced marine crab. Biol Inv 3:333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woodward G et al (2005) Body size in ecological networks. Trends Ecol Evol 20(7):402–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda L. Kelley
    • 1
  • Catherine E. de Rivera
    • 2
  • Edwin D. Grosholz
    • 3
  • Gregory M. Ruiz
    • 2
    • 4
  • Sylvia Behrens Yamada
    • 5
  • Graham Gillespie
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Ecology Evolution and Marine BiologyUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science and ManagementPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  4. 4.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  5. 5.Integrative BiologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  6. 6.Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science BranchPacific Region Pacific Biological StationNanaimoCanada

Personalised recommendations