Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 161, Issue 7, pp 1521–1530 | Cite as

Aggressive male mating behavior depends on female maturity in Octopus bimaculoides

  • Sobhi Mohanty
  • Alfredo F. OjangurenEmail author
  • Lee A. Fuiman
Original Paper

Abstract

This laboratory study examined the combined effects of male and female behaviors on the outcome of mating encounters in Octopus bimaculoides. We found that male–male competition for mating opportunities depends on female maturity; the presence of immature females elicited significantly higher levels of aggression between competing males. We conclude that males are able to assess the reproductive status of females. The study also found that immature and mature females resisted male mating attempts to a similar extent but that males that showed more aggression toward male competitors were able to spend more time in contact with females. We suggest that the lack of prominent visual displays in these mating trials indicates the importance of chemical cues in Octopus mating systems, as has been demonstrated for other cephalopods. This study contributes to the growing research on cephalopod mating systems and in particular shows that Octopus mating dynamics may be more behaviorally complex than initially assumed.

Keywords

Mature Female Multiple Paternity Immature Female Male Aggression Sperm Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jean Boal for her insightful comments regarding the research, Janet Voight and Roger Hanlon for sharing their extensive knowledge of Octopus behavior, and Karin Akre and Shinnosuke Nakayama for their help in the laboratory. Contribution 1677 of the University of Texas Marine Science Institute.

References

  1. Ambrose RF (1988) Population dynamics of Octopus bimaculatus: influence of life history patterns, synchronous reproduction and recruitment. Malacologia 29:23–39Google Scholar
  2. Andersson M, Iwasa Y (1996) Sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 11:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkhead TR, Pizzari T (2002) Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat Rev Genet 3:262–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boal JG (1997) Female choice of males in cuttlefish (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Behaviour 134:975–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boal JG (2006) Social recognition: a top down view of cephalopod behaviour. Vie et Milieu 56:69–80Google Scholar
  7. Boal JG, Marsh SE (1998) Social recognition using chemical cues in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis Linnaeus, 1758). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 230:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boal JG, Dunham AW, Williams KT, Hanlon RT (2000) Experimental evidence for spatial learning in octopuses (Octopus bimaculoides). J Comp Psychol 114:246–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R (2008) Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Funct Ecol 22:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bretman A, Gage MJG, Chapman T (2011) Quick-change artists: male plastic behavioural responses to rivals. Trends Ecol Evol 26:467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buresch KC, Boal JG, Knowles J, Debose J, Nichols A, Erwin A, Painter SD, Nagle GT, Hanlon RT (2003) Contact chemosensory cues in egg bundles elicit male–male agonistic conflicts in the squid Loligo pealeii. J Chem Ecol 29:547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buresch KC, Boal JG, Nagle GT, Knowles J, Nobuhara R, Sweeney K, Hanlon RT (2004) Experimental evidence that ovary and oviducal gland extracts influence male agonistic behavior in squids. Biol Bull 206:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buresch KC, Maxwell MR, Cox MR, Hanlon RT (2009) Temporal dynamics of mating and paternity in the squid Loligo pealeii. Mar Ecol-Progr Ser 387:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman T (2006) Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females. Curr Biol 16:744–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng MW, Caldwell RL (2000) Sex identification and mating in the blue-ringed octopus, Hapalochlaena lunulata. Anim Behav 60:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cigliano JA (1993) Dominance and den use in Octopus bimaculoides. Anim Behav 46:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cigliano JA (1995) Assessment of the mating history of female pygmy octopuses and a possible sperm competition mechanism. Anim Behav 49:849–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clutton-Brock T (2007) Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318:1882–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cummins SF, Nuurai P, Nagle GT, Degnan BM (2010) Conservation of the egg-laying hormone neuropeptide and attractin pheromone in the spotted sea hare, Aplysia dactylomela. Peptides 31:394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummins SF, Boal JG, Buresch KC, Kuanpradit C, Sobhon P, Holm JB, Degnan BM, Nagle GT, Hanlon RT (2011) Extreme aggression in male squid induced by a beta-MSP-like pheromone. Curr Biol 21:322–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eberhard W (2000) Criteria for demonstrating postcopulatory female choice. Evolution 54:1047–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eberhard W (2009) Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin’s omission and its consequences. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10025–10032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elgar MA, Champion de Crespigny FE, Ramamurthy S (2003) Male copulation behaviour and the risk of sperm competition. Anim Behav 66:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Engqvist L, Reinhold K (2006) Theoretical influence of female mating status and remating propensity on male sperm allocation patterns. J Evol Biol 19:1448–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT (1988a) Behavior, body patterning and reproductive biology of Octopus bimaculoides from California. Malacologia 29:41–55Google Scholar
  27. Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT (1988b) Effect of temperature on laboratory growth, reproduction and life span of Octopus bimaculoides. Mar Biol 98:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall KC, Hanlon RT (2002) Principal features of the mating system of a large spawning aggregation of the giant Australian cuttlefish Sepia apama (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Mar Biol 140:533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanlon RT, Messenger JB (1996) Cephalopod Behavior. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanlon RT, Naud M-J, Shaw PW, Havenhand JN (2005) Behavioural ecology: transient sexual mimicry leads to fertilization. Nature 4333:212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huffard CL, Caldwell RL, Boneka F (2008) Mating behavior of Abdopus aculeatus (d’Orbigny 1834) (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the wild. Mar Biol 154:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huffard CL, Caldwell RL, Boneka F (2010) Male–male and male–female aggression may influence mating associations in wild octopuses (Abdopus aculeatus). J Comp Psychol 124:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Iwata Y, Munehara H, Sakurai Y (2005) Dependance of paternity rates on alternative reproductive behaviors in the squid Loligo bleekeri. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 298:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iwata Y, Shaw P, Fujiwara E, Shiba K, Kakiuchi Y, Hirohashi N (2011) Why small males have big sperm: dimorphic squid sperm linked to alternative mating behaviours. BMC Evol Biol 11:236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joll LM (1976) Mating, egg-laying and hatching of Octopus tetricus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the laboratory. Mar Biol 36:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Katsanevakis S, Verriopoulos G (2004) Den ecology of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1979, on soft sediment: availability and types of shelter. Sci Mar 68:147–157Google Scholar
  37. Kelly CD, Jennions MD (2011) Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation. Biol Rev 86:863–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. King AJ, Adamo SA, Hanlon RT (1999) Contact with squid egg capsules increases agonistic behavior in male squid (Loligo pealei). Biol Bull 197:256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Phil Trans R Soc B 361:319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lehtonen TK, Lindström K (2009) Females decide whether size matters: plastic mate preferences tuned to the intensity of male–male competition. Behav Ecol 20:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leite TS, Haimovici M, Molina W, Warnke K (2008) Morphological and genetic description of Octopus insularis, a new cryptic species in the Octopus vulgaris complex (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from the tropical southwestern Atlantic. J Mollus Stud 74:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mangold K, Boletzky SV (1973) New data on reproductive biology and growth of Octopus vulgaris. Mar Biol 19:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mather JA (1982) Factors affecting the spatial distribution of natural populations of Octopus joubini Robson. Anim Behav 30:1166–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mather JA (1985) Behavioural interactions and activity of captive Eledone moschata: laboratory investigations of a ‘social’ octopus. Anim Behav 33:1138–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mellor D, Wilt L, Gershenson D, Howe D, Jordan R (2012) Female preference in the context of male–male interactions in Maylandia zebra of Lake Malawi. J Ethol 30:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Naud MJ, Shaw PW, Hanlon RT, Havenhand JN (2005) Evidence for biased use of sperm sources in wild female giant cuttlefish (Sepia apama). Proc Biol Sci Lond 272:1047–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parker GA, Pizzari T (2010) Sperm competition and ejaculate economics. Biol Rev 85:897–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quienteiro J, Tarik B, Oukhattar L, Soukri L, Seixas P, Rey-Mendez M (2011) Multiple paternity in the common octopus Octopus vulgaris (Cuvier, 1797), as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis. Molluscan Res 31:15–20Google Scholar
  49. Rocha F, González AF, Segonzac M, Guerra A (2002) Behavioural observations of the cephalopod Vulcanoctopus hydrothermalis. Ca Biol Mar 43:299–302Google Scholar
  50. Shaw PW, Sauer WHH (2004) Multiple paternity and complex fertilization dynamics in the squid Loligo vulgaris reynaudii. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 270:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sinn DL, Perrrin NA, Mather JA, Anderson RC (2001) Early temperamental traits in an octopus (Octopus bimaculoides). J Comp Psychol 115:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas M (2011) Detection of female mating status using chemical signals and cues. Biol Rev 86:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson JT, Voight JR (2003) Erectile tissue in an invertebrate animal: the Octopus copulatory organ. J Zool 261:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  55. Voight JR (1991a) Ligula length and courtship in Octopus digueti: a potential mechanism of mate choice. Evolution 45:1726–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Voight JR (1991b) Enlarged suckers as an indicator of male maturity in Octopus. B Mar Sci 49:98–106Google Scholar
  57. Voight JR, Feldheim KA (2009) Microsatellite inheritance and multiple paternity in the deep-sea octopus Graneledone boreopacifica (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Invertebr Biol 128:26–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walderon MD, Nolt KJ, Haas RE, Prosscr KN, Holm JB, Nagle GT, Boal JG (2011) Distance chemoreception and the detection of conspecifics in Octopus bimaculoides. J Mollus Stud 77:309–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wells MJ (1978) Octopus. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wells MJ, Wells J (1972) Sexual displays and mating of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier and O. cyanea Gray and attempts to alter performance by manipulating the glandular condition of the animals. Anim Behav 20:293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sobhi Mohanty
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alfredo F. Ojanguren
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Lee A. Fuiman
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Science InstituteThe University of Texas at AustinPort AransasUSA
  2. 2.School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.Scottish Oceans InstituteUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations