Skip to main content
Log in

Live discrimination of Calanus glacialis and C. finmarchicus females: can we trust phenological differences?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 02 September 2014

Abstract

Two key players in the Arctic and subarctic marine ecosystem are the calanoid copepods, Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis. Although morphologically very similar, these sibling species have different life cycles and roles in the Arctic pelagic marine ecosystem. Considering that the distribution of C. glacialis corresponds to Arctic water masses and C. finmarchicus to Atlantic water masses, the species are frequently used as climate indicators. Consequently, correct identification of the two species is essential if we want to understand climate-impacted changes on Calanus-dominated marine ecosystems such as the Arctic. Here, we present a novel morphological character (redness) to distinguish live females of C. glacialis and C. finmarchicus and compare it to morphological (prosome length) and genetic identification. The characters are tested on 300 live females of C. glacialis and C. finmarchicus from Disko Bay, western Greenland. Our analysis confirms that length cannot be used as a stand-alone criterion for separation. The results based on the new morphological character were verified genetically using a single mitochondrial marker (16S) and nuclear loci (six microsatellites and 12 InDels). The pigmentation criterion was also used on individuals (n = 89) from Young Sound fjord, northeast Greenland to determine whether the technique was viable in different geographical locations. Genetic markers based on mitochondrial and nuclear loci were corroborative in their identification of individuals and revealed no hybrids. Molecular identification confirmed that live females of the two species from Greenlandic waters, both East and West, can easily be separated by the red pigmentation of the antenna and somites of C. glacialis in contrast to the pale opaque antenna and somites of C. finmarchicus, confirming that the pigmentation criterion is valid for separation of the two species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt KE, Nielsen TG, Rysgaard S, Tönneson K (2010) Differences in plankton community structure along the Godthåbsfjord; from the Greenland Ice Sheet to offshore waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401:49–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir K, Borsa P, Goudet J, Chikhi L, Bonhomme F (2001) G E N E T I X, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la genetique des populations. Laboratoire Genome et populations, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover RJ (1988) Comparative life histories in the genera Calanus and Neocalanus in high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere. Hydrobiologia 167:127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyer JA, Hoarau G, Stam WT, Olsen JL (2007) Hybridization and introgression in a mixed population of the intertidal seaweeds Fucus distichus and F. serratus. J Evol Biol 16:3606–3616

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünweber M, Swalethorp R, Kjellerup S, Nielsen TG, Møller EF, Hjort M, Arendt K, Tönnesson K (2010) Fate of the spring diatom bloom in Disko Bay, western Greenland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 419:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk-Petersen S, Pavlov V, Timofeev S, Sargent JR (2007) Climate variability and possible effects on arctic food chains: the role of Calanus. Arctic alpine ecosystems and people in a changing environment. Springer, Berlin, pp 147–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Falk-Petersen S, Mayzaud P, Kattner G, Sargent J (2009) Lipids and life strategy of Arctic Calanus. Mar Biol Res 5:18–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost BW (1974) Calanus marshallae, a new species of calanoid copepod closely allied to sibling species Calanus finmarchicus and Calanus glacialis. Mar Biol 26:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsen TM, Merkel B, Søreide JE, Johansson-Karlsson E, Bailey A, Vogedes D, Nygård D, Varpe Ø, Berge J (2012) Potential misidentifications of two climate indicator species of the marine arctic ecosystem: Calanus glacialis and C. finmarchicus. Polar Biol 35:1621–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MO, Nielsen TG, Stedmon C, Munk P (2012) Oceanographic regime shift during 1997 in Disko Bay, Western Greenland. Limnol Oceanogr 57(2):634–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirche H-J, Kattner G (1993) Egg production and lipid content of Calanus glacialis in spring: indication of a food-dependent and food-independent reproductive mode. Mar Biol 117:615–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirche HJ, Kosobokova K (2007) Distribution of Calanus finmarchicus in the northern North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean: expatriation and potential colonization. Deep-Sea Res II 54:2729–2747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirche H-J, Hagen W, Mumm N, Richter C (1994) The northeast water Polynya, Greenland Sea. 3. Mesozooplankton and macrozooplankton distribution and production of dominant herbivorous copepods during spring. Polar Biol 14:491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellerup S, Dünweber M, Swalethorp R, Nielsen TG, Møller EF, Markaager S, Hansen BW (2012) The effect of a future warmer ocean on the co-existing copepods Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis in the Disko bay western Greenland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 447:87–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levinsen H, Nielsen TG, Hansen BW (2000) Annual succession of marine protozoans in the arctic with emphasis on winter dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 206:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeque PK, Harris RP, Jones MB, Smerdon GR (1999) Simple molecular method to distinguish the identity of Calanus species (Copepoda: Calanoida) at any developmental stage. Mar Biol 133:91–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeque PK, Harris RP, Jones MB, Smerdon GR (2004) Distribution of Calanus spp. as determined using a genetic identification system. Sci Mar 68(Suppl 1):121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeque PK, Hay SJ, Heath MR, Ingvarsdottir A, Rasmussen J, Smerdon GR, Waniek JJ (2006) Integrating conventional microscopy and molecular analysis to analyse the abundance and distribution of four Calanus congeners in the North Atlantic. J Plank Res 27(12):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen SD, Nielsen TG, Hansen BW (2001) Annual population development and production by Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis during the Arctic spring. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 353:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen SJ, Nielsen TG, Tervo OM, Söderkvist J (2008) On the importance of feeding for egg production of Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis during the Arctic spring. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 353:177–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EE, Bach LA, Kotlicki P (2006) H Y B R I D L A B (version 1.0): a program for generation simulated hybrids from population samples. Mol Ecol Notes 6:971–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen TG, Ottosen LD, Hansen BW (2007) Structure and function of the pelagic ecosystem in an ice covered arctic fjord. In: Rysgaard S, Glud RN (eds) Carbon cycling in Arctic marine ecosystems: case study Young Sound. Bioscience Special Issue, Meddr Greenland, pp 88–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR, Benzie J (1991) Large mitochondrial DNA differences between morphologically similar Penaeid shrimp. Mol Mar Biol Biotech 1:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent GJ, Plourde S, Turgeon J (2011) Overlapping size ranges of Calanus spp. off the Canadian Arctic and Atlantic coasts: Impact on species’ abundances. J Plank Res 33:1654–1665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parent JG, Plourde S, Turgeon J (2012) Natural hybridization between Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis (Copepoda) in the Arctic and Northwest Atlantic. Limnol Oceanogr 57(4):1057–1066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plourde S, Runge JA (1993) Reproduction of the planktonic copepod Calanus finmarchicus in the lower St. Lawrence Estuary: relation to the cycle of phytoplankton production and evidence for a Calanus pump. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 102:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan J, Beatty GE, Keating SL, Maggs CA, Savage G (2009) High dispersal potential has maintained long-term population stability in the North Atlantic copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rysgaard S, Nielsen TG, Hansen BW (1999) Seasonal variation in nutrients, pelagic primary production and grazing in a high-Arctic coastal marine ecosystem, Young Sound, Northeast Greenland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 179:13–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slagstad D, Ellingsen IH, Wassmann P (2011) Evaluating primary and secondary production in an Arctic Ocean void of summer sea ice: an experimental simulation approach. Prog Oceanogr 90:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolina I, Kollias S, Poortvliet M, Nielsen TG, Lindeque P, Castellani C, Møller EF, Blanco-Bercial L, Hoarau G (2014) Genome- and transcriptome-assisted development of nuclear insertion/deletion markers for Calanus species (Copepoda: Calanoida) identification. Mol Ecol Res. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12241

  • Swalethorp R, Kjellerup S, Dünweber M, Nielsen TG, Møller EF, Rysgaard S, Hansen BW (2011) Production of Calanus finmarchicus, C. glacialis and C. hyperboreus in Disko Bay, western Greenland, with emphasis on life strategy. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 429:125–144

  • Unstad KH, Tande KS (1991) Depth distribution of Calanus finmarchicus and Calanus glacialis in relation to environmental conditions in the Barents Sea. Polar Res 10:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner I, Hirche H-J (2001) Observations on Calanus glacialis eggs under the spring ice in the Barents Sea. Polar Biol 24:296–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission FP7 EURO-BASIN project (Grant Agreement: 264 933), the Greenland Climate Research Centre (Project 6505) and the Norwegian Research Council (Project HAVKYST 216578). We would like to thank Mette D. Agersted for collecting Calanus from the East Greenland. We would like to thank the Arctic Station Qeqertarsuaq, University of Copenhagen that provided an excellent working platform on land as well as the captain and the crew on R. V. Porsild for great technical support at sea. We also thank Katharine Pemberton, Spyros Kollias and Marloes Poortvliet for their assistance with genotyping.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torkel Gissel Nielsen.

Additional information

Communicated by X. Irigoyen.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 166 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, T.G., Kjellerup, S., Smolina, I. et al. Live discrimination of Calanus glacialis and C. finmarchicus females: can we trust phenological differences?. Mar Biol 161, 1299–1306 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2419-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2419-5

Keywords

Navigation