Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 159, Issue 12, pp 2875–2884 | Cite as

Material properties of Didemnum vexillum and prediction of tendril fragmentation

  • James F. ReinhardtEmail author
  • Kimberley L. Gallagher
  • Lauren M. Stefaniak
  • Riley Nolan
  • Montgomery T. Shaw
  • Robert B. Whitlatch
Original Paper

Abstract

The colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum has recently invaded the North American coast and has the potential to cause economic and ecological damage. One potential mechanism for adult D. vexillum colonies to disperse is fragmentation and subsequent reattachment to another substrate. To understand the life history and ecology of D. vexillum and obtain a first-order estimate of dispersal potential via fragmentation, (1) the basic material properties of D. vexillum sampled from two locations in southern New England were measured in two growth forms (i.e., encrusting and tendril forms); (2) summer calcium concentration was measured as a proxy for spicule densities; and (3) the environmental stress factor (ESF) of tendrils under various hydrodynamic circumstances (i.e., water velocities from 0.01 to 20 m s−1) was determined. Results show that D. vexillum colonies have high tensile strengths compared to other colonial tunicates. Colonies with higher calcium concentration tended to have greater elastic modulus (resistance to deformation). Calculations of ESF suggest that tidal currents are insufficient to cause fragmentation; however, wave-generated (in rare circumstances) and mechanical forces from vessels and trawl equipment may cause fragmentation.

Keywords

Tensile Strength Calcium Concentration Drag Coefficient Velocity Setting Environmental Stress Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the University of Connecticut Center for Environmental Science and Engineering (CESE), the Quebec Labrador Fund/Sounds Conservancy, the Connecticut Sea Grant College Program, and the US EPA STAR Program. JFR was supported by a fellowship from the EPA/Long Island Sound Study while the research was being carried out. Many thanks to divers and others who helped carry out this research, including Dave Hudson, Danielle Calini, and “SCUBA” Joe Mangiafico. Thanks to Frank Bohlen for use of the flume and to Mike Whitney, Liz Huett, and two reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Auker LA, Oviatt CA (2008) Factors influencing the recruitment and abundance of Didemnum in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons 65:765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohlen WF (1969) Experimental studies of turbulence in liquid-solid flows. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods HoleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bullard SG, Lambert G, Carman M, Byrnes J, Whitlatch RB, Ruiz G, Miller R, Harris L, Valentine P, Collie J (2007a) The colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. a: current distribution, basic biology and potential threat to marine communities of the northeast and west coasts of North America. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullard SG, Sedlack B, Reinhardt JF, Litty C, Gareau K, Whitlatch RB (2007b) Fragmentation of colonial ascidians: differences in reattachment capability among species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:166–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butman B, Beardsley RD (1987) Long-term observations on the southern flank of Georges Bank. Part I: a description of the seasonal cycle of currents, temperature, stratification and wind stress. J Phys Ocean 17:367–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denny M (1995) Predicting physical disturbance: mechanistic approaches to the study of survivorship on wave-swept shores. Ecol Monogr 65:371–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dijkstra J, Harris L, Westerman E (2007) Distribution and long-term temporal patterns of four invasive colonial ascidians in the Gulf of Maine. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edlund AF, Koehl MAR (1998) Adhesion and reattachment of compound ascidians to various substrata: weak glue can prevent tissue damage. J Exp Biol 201:2397–2402Google Scholar
  9. Hacker SD, Gaines SD (1997) Some implications of direct positive interaction for community species diversity. Ecology 78:1990–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hopkins G, Forrest BM, Piola RF, Gardner JP (2011) Factors affecting survivorship of defouled communities and the effect of fragmentation on establishment success. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 396:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson AS, Koehl MAR (1994) Maintenance of dynamic strain similarity and environmental stress factor in different flow habitats: thallus allometry and material properties of a giant kelp. J Exp Biol 195:381–410Google Scholar
  12. Kinlan BP, Gaines SD, Lester SE (2005) Propagule dispersal and the scales of marine community process. Divers Distrib 11:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koehl MAR (1982) Mechanical design of spicule-reinforced connective tissue: stiffness. J Exp Biol 98:239–267Google Scholar
  14. Kott P (2002) A complex didemnid ascidian from Whangamata, New Zealand. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 82:625–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kundu PK, Cohen IM (2004) Fluid mechanics, 3rd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Lambert G (2009) Adventures of a sea squirt sleuth: unraveling the identity of Didemnum vexillum, a global ascidian invader. Aquat Invasions 4:5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lengyel N, Collie JS, Valentine PC (2009) The invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum on Georges Bank—ecological effects and genetic identification. Aquat Invasions 4:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lester SE, Ruttenberg BI, Gaines SD, Kinlan BP (2007) The relationship between dispersal ability and geographic range size. Ecol Lett 10:745–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis JC, Wallis EV (1991) The function of surface sclerites in gorgonians (Coelenterata, Octocorallia). Biol Bull 181:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindquist N, Hay ME, Fenical W (1992) Defense of ascidians and their conspicuous larvae: adult vs. larval chemical defenses. Ecol Monogr 62:547–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCarthy A, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2007) Effects of temperature on growth rates of colonial ascidians: a comparison of Didemnum sp. to Botryllus schlosseri and Botrylloides violaceus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:172–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mercer J, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (2009) Potential effects of the invasive colonial ascidian (Didemnum vexillum) on pebble-cobble bottom habitats in Long Island Sound, USA. Aquat Invasions 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morris JA Jr, Carman MR (2012) Fragment reattachment, reproductive status, and health indicators of the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum with implications for dispersal. Biol Invasions. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0219-8
  24. Morris JA Jr, Carman MR, Hoagland KE, Green-Beach ERM, Karney RC (2009) Impact of the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum on the recruitment of the bay scallop (Argopecten irradians irradians) and implications for recruitment of the sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) on Georges Bank. Aquat Invasions 4:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murray CC, Therriault TW, Martone PT (2012) Adapted for invasion? Comparing attachment, drag and dislodgment of native and nonindigenous hull fouling species. Biol Invasions. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0178-0
  26. Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (1995) The influence of resident adults on recruitment: a comparison to settlement. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 190:169–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2007) Variation in the ability of Didemnum sp. to invade established communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palumbi SR (1986) How body plans limit acclimation: responses of a demosponge to wave force. Ecol 67:208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
  30. Schonberg CHL, Wilkinson CR (2001) Induced colonization of corals by clionid bioeroding sponge. Coral Reefs 20:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shanks AL, Grantham BA, Carr MH (2003) Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaw MT, MacKnight WJ (2005) Introduction to polymer viscoelasticity. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith LD, Hughes TP (1999) An experimental assessment of survival, re-attachment and fecundity of coral fragments. J Exp Biol Ecol 235:14–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stefaniak L, Lambert G, Gittenberger A, Zhang H, Lin S, Whitlatch RB (2009) Genetic conspecificity of the worldwide populations of Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002. Aquat Invasions 4:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stefaniak L, Zhang H, Gittenberger A, Smith K, Holsinger K, Lin S, Whitlatch RB (2012) Determining the native region of the putatively invasive ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 422–423:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart H (2006) Ontogenetic changes in buoyancy, breaking strength, extensibility, and reproductive investment in a drifting macroalga Turbinaria ornata (Phaeophyta). J Phycol 42:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stoner DS (1990) Recruitment of a tropical colonial ascidian: relative importance of pre-settlement vs. post-settlement processes. Ecol 71:1682–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Valentine PC, Collie JS, Reid RN, Asch RG, Guida VG, Blackwood DS (2007) The occurrence of the colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. on Georges Bank gravel habitat—ecological observations and potential effects on groundfish and scallop fisheries. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valentine PC, Carman MR, Dijkstra J, Blackwood DS (2009) Larval recruitment of the invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum, seasonal water temperatures in New England coastal and offshore waters, and implications for spread of the species. Aquat Invasions 4:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vogel S (1984) Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms. Am Zool 24:37–44Google Scholar
  41. Worcester SE (1994) Adult rafting versus larval swimming: dispersal and recruitment of a botryllid ascidian on eelgrass. Mar Biol 121:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Reinhardt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kimberley L. Gallagher
    • 2
  • Lauren M. Stefaniak
    • 2
  • Riley Nolan
    • 2
  • Montgomery T. Shaw
    • 3
  • Robert B. Whitlatch
    • 2
  1. 1.I. M. Systems GroupNOAA Restoration CenterSilver SpringUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of ConnecticutGrotonUSA
  3. 3.Polymer Program, Institute of Material SciencesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations