Marine Biology

, Volume 159, Issue 6, pp 1177–1182 | Cite as

Inducible defenses in the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin in response to the presence of the predatory oyster drill Urosalpinx cinerea Say in Long Island Sound

  • Joshua P. LordEmail author
  • Robert B. Whitlatch
Original Paper


The response of the eastern oyster C. virginica to the presence of the oyster drill Urosalpinx cinerea was examined from July to September 2011. Several aspects of oyster growth were measured, including wet weight, shell weight, and dorsal shell area for oysters collected near Groton, Connecticut (41.32036 N, −72.06330 W). Wet weight and shell weight growth were significantly higher in the presence of the predator U. cinerea, while tissue weight showed no difference from the control. The control group showed more shell area growth and a much lower ratio of shell weight growth to shell area growth. Differences in shell weight to area ratio indicated that C. virginica dramatically shifted from lateral shell growth to shell thickening in the presence of U. cinerea. This inducible defense has not been previously shown for C. virginica and could play an important role in the predator–prey interaction between these two species.


Shell Thickness Shell Growth Inducible Defense Thick Shell Predator Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Thanks to Jeremy Calini and Wendy Turek, who were instrumental in the design, setup, and execution of this experiment. Additional thanks to Zair Burris for assistance with pre-experimental measurements. The project was funded by grants from the Connecticut College Sea Grant and U.S. EPA—STAR programs.


  1. Appleton RD, Palmer AR (1988) Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4387–4391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt JD (1997) Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q Rev Biol 72:149–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdeau PE (2010) An inducible morphological defence is a passive by-product of behaviour in a marine snail. Proc R Soc B 277:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buhle ER, Ruesink JL (2009) Impacts of invasive oyster drills on olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864) recovery in Willapa Bay, Washington, United States. J Shell Res 28:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carriker MR (1969) Excavation of boreholes by the gastropod, Urosalpinx: an analysis by light and scanning electron microscopy. Am Zool 9(3):917–933Google Scholar
  6. Cronin G, Hay ME (1996) Induction of seaweed chemical defenses by amphipod grazing. Ecology 77:2287–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dame RF (1972) The ecological energies of growth, respiration and assimilation in the intertidal American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Mar Biol 17:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dittman DE, Ford SE, Haskin HH (1998) Growth patterns in oysters, Crassostrea virginica, from different estuaries. Mar Biol 132:461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faasse M, Ligthart M (2009) American (Urosalpinx cinerea) and Japanese oyster drill (Ocinebrellus inornatus) (Gastropoda:Muricidae) flourish near shellfish culture plots in the Netherlands. Aquat Invasions 4:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Federighi H (1931) Studies on the oyster drill (Urosalpinx cinerea Say). Bull US Bur Fish 47:83–115Google Scholar
  11. Franz DR (1971) Population age structure, growth and longevity of the marine gastropod Urosalpinx cinerea Say. Bio Bull 140:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gazeau F, Gattuso JP, Dawber C, Pronker AE, Peene F, Peene J, Heip CHR, Middelburg JJ (2010) Effect of ocean acidification on the early life stages of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Biogeosciences 7:2051–2060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graus RR (1974) Latitudinal trends in the shell characteristics of marine gastropods. Lethaia 7:303–314Google Scholar
  14. Hanks JE (1957) The rate of feeding of the common oyster drill, Urosalpinx cinerea (Say), at controlled water temperatures. Bio Bull 112(3):330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvell CD (1986) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses in a marine bryozoan: cues, costs, and consequences. Am Nat 128(6):810–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karban R, Myers JH (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawai K (2009) Shell growth, reproduction and mortality of Ovula ovum in southern Kyushu, Japan. J Moll Stud 75:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonard GH, Bertness MD, Yund PO (1999) Crab predation, waterborne cues, and inducible defenses in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Ecology 80(1):1–14Google Scholar
  19. Lively CM (1986) Predator-induced shell dimorphism in the acorn barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma. Evolution 40:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McIntosh AR, Townsend CR (1996) Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: a trophic cascade mediated by fish-induced changes to grazer behaviour? Oecologia 108(1):174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miyaji T, Tanabe K, Matsushima Y, Sato S, Yokoyama Y, Matsuzaki H (2010) Response of daily and annual shell growth patterns of the intertidal bivalve Phacosoma japonicum to Holocene coastal climate change in Japan. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 286:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakaoka M (2000) Nonlethal effects of predators on prey populations: predator-mediated change in bivalve growth. Ecology 81(4):1031–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newell RC, Kofoed LH (1977) Adjustment of the components of energy balance in the gastropod Crepidula fornicata in response to thermal acclimation. Mar Biol 44:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ordzie CJ, Garofalo GC (1980) Predation, attack success, and attraction to the bay scallop, Argopecten irradians (Lamarck) by the oyster drill, Urosalpinx cinerea (Say). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 47(1):95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmer AR (1982) Growth in marine gastropods: a non-destructive technique for independently measuring shell and body weight. Malacologia 23:63–73Google Scholar
  26. Palmer AR (1985) The adaptive value of shell variation in Thais lamellosa: effect of thick shells on vulnerability to prey and to preferences by crabs. Veliger 27:349–356Google Scholar
  27. Palmer AR, Carriker MR (1979) Effects of cultural conditions on morphology of the shell of the oyster. Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc 69:58–72Google Scholar
  28. Peacor SD, Werner EE (2001) The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(7):3904–3908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Polson MP, Hewson WE, Eernisse DJ, Baker PK, Zacherl DC (2009) You say conchaphila, I say lurida: molecular evidence for restricting the Olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864) to temperature western North America. J Shell Res 28:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pratt DM (1974) Behavioral defenses of Crepidula fornicata against attack by Urosalpinx cinerea. Mar Biol 27:47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ren JS, Ross AH (2001) A dynamic energy budget model of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Ecol Model 142:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmitz OJ, Beckerman AP, O’Brien KM (1997) Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78(5):1388–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sebens KP (1987) The ecology of indeterminate growth in animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:371–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh SM, Zouros E (1978) Genetic variation associated with growth rate in the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica). Evolution 32(2):342–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomsen J, Melzner F (2010) Moderate seawater acidification does not elicit long-term metabolic depression in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol 157:2667–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trussell GC, Etter RJ (2001) Integrating genetic and environmental forces that shape the evolution of geographic variation in a marine snail. Genetica 112–113:321–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2003) Trait-mediated effects in rocky intertidal food chains: predator risk cues alter prey feeding rates. Ecology 84(3):629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner AM, Bernot RJ, Boes CM (2000) Chemical cue modify species interactions: the ecological consequences of predator avoidance by freshwater snails. Oikos 88(1):148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Alstyne KL (1988) Herbivore grazing increases poly-phenolic defenses in an intertidal brown alga, Fucus distichus. Ecology 69:655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vermeij GJ (1982) Phenotypic evolution in a poorly dispersing snail after arrival of a predator. Nature 299:349–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Connecticut Avery PointGrotonUSA

Personalised recommendations