Marine Biology

, Volume 159, Issue 4, pp 897–905 | Cite as

Variation in size at sex-change among natural populations of the protandrous hermaphrodite, Crepidula fornicata (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae)

Original Paper

Abstract

Protandrous hermaphrodites are predicted to change sex from male to female when relative reproductive fitness of females surpasses that of males. How size at sex transition varies with population, mating group and individual parameters was investigated for five populations of the protandrous hermaphrodite slipper snail, Crepidula fornicata. The populations varied for density, size distribution, average mating group size and sex ratio. Size at sex-change was correlated with the population sex ratio. Comparisons of multiple hypotheses revealed that variables predicting the sex of a snail vary among positions in the mating group. The variables included body size, the relative size of the snail sitting atop the focal snail and population density. Our data support the conclusions that size at sex-change (and by inference, the size at which one sex has relatively greater fitness) is not fixed for these hermaphrodites and that individual size, social conditions and population differences all influence variation in relative fitness.

Supplementary material

227_2011_1867_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

References

  1. Anderson DR (2008) Model based inference in the life sciences: a primer of evidence. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeza JA (2007) Sex allocation in a simultaneously hermaphroditic marine shrimp. Evolution 61:2360–2373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berglund A (1990) Sequential hermaphroditism and the size-advantage model: an experimental test. Anim Behav 39:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model Selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Buston P (2003) Social hierarchies: size and growth modification in clownfish. Nature 424:145–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnov EL (1979) Natural selection and sex-change in a Pandalid shrimp: test of a life history theory. Am Nat 113:715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Chipperfield PNJ (1951) The breeding of Crepidula fornicata in the River Blackwater, Essex. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 30:49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coe WR (1932) Sexual phases in the American oyster (Ostrea virginica). Biol Bull 63:419–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coe WR (1936) Sexual phases in Crepidula. J Exp Zool 72:455–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coe WR (1938) Conditions influencing change of sex in mollusks of the genus Crepidula. J Exp Zool 77:401–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coe WR (1953) Influence of association, isolation and nutrition on the sexuality of snails of the genus Crepidula. J Exp Zool 122:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collin R (1995) Sex, size and position: a test of models predicting size at sex change in the protandrous gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Am Nat 146:815–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collin R (2006) Sex ratio, life-history invariants, and patterns of sex change in a family of protandrous gastropods. Evolution 60:735–745Google Scholar
  15. Collin R, McLellan M, Gruber K, Bailey-Jourdain C (2005) Effects of conspecific associations on size at sex change in three species of calyptraeid gastropods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conklin EG (1897) The embryology of Crepidula, a contribution to the cell lineage and early development of some marine gasteropods. J Morphol 13:1–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dupont L, Jollivet D, Viard F (2003) High genetic diversity and ephemeral drift effects in a successful introduced mollusc (Crepidula fornicata: Gastropoda). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dupont L, Richard J, Paulet Y-M, Thouzeau G, Viard F (2006) Gregariousness and protandry promote reproductive insurance in the invasive gastropod Crepidula fornicata: evidence from assignment of larval paternity. Mol Ecol 15:3009–3021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dupont L, Bernas D, Viard F (2007) Sex and genetic structure across age groups in populations of the European marine invasive mollusc, Crepidula fornicata L. (Gastropoda). Biol J Linn Soc 90:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott AC, Reisch JS (2006) Implementing a multiple comparison test for proportions in a 2xc Crosstabulation in SAS. In: LeBouton AV (ed) 31st annual SAS users group international conference. SAS Institute Inc., San Francisco, p 204Google Scholar
  21. Ghiselin M (1969) The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q Rev Biol 44:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gould HJ (1957) Studies on sex in the hermaphrodite mollusk Crepidula plana. J Exp Zool 119:93–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gould SJ (1985) The flamingo’s smile: reflections in natural history. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoagland KE (1978) Protandry and the evolution of environmentally mediated sex change. Malacologia 17:365–391Google Scholar
  25. Orton JH (1909) On the occurrence of protandric hermaphroditism in the mollusc Crepidula fornicata. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 81:468–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Proestou D, Goldsmith M, Twombley S (2008) Patterns of male reproductive success in Crepidula fornicata provide new insight for sex allocation and optimal sex change. Biol Bull 214:194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richard J, Huet M, Thouzeau G, Paulet Y-M (2006) Reproduction of the invasive slipper limpet, Crepidula fornicata, in the Bay of Brest, France. Mar Biol 149:789–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rivera-Ingraham GA, Espinosa F, García-Gómez JC (2011) Environmentally mediated sex-change in the endangered limpet, Patella ferruginea (Gastropodia: Patellidae). J Molluscan Stud 77:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  30. Soong K, Chen J-L (1991) Population structure and sex-change in the coral-inhabiting snail, Coralliophila violacea at Hsiao-Liuchiu, Taiwan. Mar Biol 111:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Warner RR (1988) Sex change and the size advantage model. Trends Ecol Evol 3:133–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warner RR, Swearer SE (1991) Social control of sex change in the Bluehead Wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum (Pisces: Labridae). Biol Bull 181:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Warner RR, Fitch DL, Standish JD (1996) Social control of sex change in the shelf limpet, Crepidula norrisiarum: size specific responses to local group composition. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 204:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wright WG (1989) Intraspecific density mediates sex-change in the territorial patellacean limpet Lottia gigantea. Mar Biol 100:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zar J (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southeast Environmental Research CenterFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and EvolutionStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations