Marine Biology

, Volume 158, Issue 4, pp 835–844 | Cite as

Monitoring acoustically tagged king prawns Penaeus (Melicertus) plebejus in an estuarine lagoon

  • Matthew D. TaylorEmail author
  • Anthony Ko
Original Paper


Fine-scale movement patterns in penaeid prawns are rarely observed in situ, but are essential in understanding habitat use, foraging, and anti-predator behaviour. Acoustic telemetry was applied to examine the activity, space utilization, and habitat use of the eastern king prawn Penaeus (Melicertus) plebejus, at small temporal and spatial scales. Tracking of sub-adult P. plebejus (n = 9) in Wallagoot Lake (36.789°S, 149.959°E; 23 April–12 May 2009) and calculation of a minimum activity index (MAI) revealed high variation in activity rates across diel periods and in different habitats. Elevated activity rates and movement indicated foraging in unvegetated habitats during the night. Areas within the 95 and 50% space utilization contours averaged 2,654.1 ± 502.0 and 379.9 ± 103.9 m2, respectively, and there was a significant negative relationship between these areas and prawn activity rates in unvegetated habitats. This study provides the first estimates of prawn activity rates and space utilization in the field. Application of acoustic telemetry can increase knowledge of prawn movements and their interactions with other marine species in different habitats.


Activity Rate Aquatic Macrophyte Carapace Length Space Utilization Moult Cycle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors wish to acknowledge A. Ferguson, E. Venstra, C. Setio and N. Henschke for assistance in field and laboratory work. The authors also wish to thank four anonymous reviewers for their extensive comments and advice, which helped shape the final version of this manuscript. This work was conducted using funding from an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant with the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Recreational Saltwater Fishing Trust (LP0775000). This paper is contribution 0019 of the Sydney Institute of Marine Science.

Supplementary material

227_2010_1610_MOESM1_ESM.doc (9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 9237 kb)


  1. Afonso P, Fontes J, Holland K, Santos R (2009) Multi-scale patterns of habitat use in a highly mobile reef fish, the white trevally Pseudocaranx dentex, and their implications for marine reserve design. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 381:273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubert H, Lightner DV (2000) Identification of genetic populations of the Pacific blue shrimp Penaeus stylirostris of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar Biol 137:875–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benfield MC, Minello TJ (1996) Relative effects of turbidity and light intensity on reactive distance and feeding of an estuarine fish. Environ Biol of Fishes 46:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergstrom U, Englund G (2004) Spatial scale, heterogeneity and functional responses. J An Ecol 73:487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bozdogan H (1987) Model selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion: the general theory and its analytical extensions. Physcometrika 52:345–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer DT, Blaber SJM, Salini JP, Farmer MJ (1995) Feeding ecology of predatory fishes from Groote Eylandt in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, with special reference to predation on penaeid prawns. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 40:577–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark KL, Ruiz GM, Hines AH (2003) Diel variation in predator abundance, predation risk and prey distribution in shallow–water estuarine habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 287:37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connolly RM, Melville AJ, Preston KM (2002) Patterns of movement and habitat use by leafy seadragons tracked ultrasonically. J Fish Biol 61:684–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cote D, Moulton S, Frampton P, Scruton D, McKinley R (2004) Habitat use and early winter movements by juvenile Atlantic cod in a coastal area of Newfoundland. J Fish Biol 64:665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Courtney AJ, Die DJ, Holmes MJ (1994) Discriminating populations of the eastern king prawn, Penaeus plebejus, from different estuaries using ICPMS trace–element analysis. Atomic Spectrosc 15:1–6Google Scholar
  11. Dall W, Hill B, Rothlisberg P, Sharples D (1990) The biology of the Penaeidae. Adv Mar Sci 27:1–488Google Scholar
  12. Flegel TW (2007) The right to refuse revision in the genus Penaeus. Aquaculture 264:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fry B, Baltz DM, Benfield MC, Fleeger JW, Gace A, Haas HL, Quinones-Rivera ZJ (2003) Stable isotope indicators of movement and residency for brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) in coastal Louisiana marshscapes. Estuaries 26:82–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaister JP, Lau T, McDonall VC (1987) Growth and migration of tagged eastern Australian king prawns, Penaeus plebejus Hess. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 38:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaister JP, Montgomery SS, McDonall VC (1990) Yield-per-recruit analysis of eastern king prawns Penaeus plebejus Hess, in eastern Australia. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 41:175–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glazer RA, Kidney JA (2004) Habitat associations of adult queen conch (Strombus gigas L.) in an unfished Florida keys back reef: applications to essential fish habitat. Bull Mar Sci 75:205–224Google Scholar
  17. Griffiths SP (1999) Effects of lunar periodicity on catches of Penaeus plebejus (Hess) in an Australian coastal lagoon. Fish Res 42:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heupel MR, Semmens JM, Hobday AJ (2006) Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays. Mar Freshw Res 57:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill BJ, Wassenberg TJ (1987) Feeding behavior of adult tiger prawns, Penaeus esculentus, under laboratory conditions. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 38:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill BJ, Wassenberg TJ (1992) Preferences and amount of food eaten by the prawn Penaeus esculentus over the molt cycle. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 43:727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horne JS, Garton EO (2006) Liklihood cross-validation versus least squares cross-validation for choosing the smoothing parameter in kernel home-range analysis. J Wildl Manage 70:641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houde ED, Rutherford ES (1993) Recent trends in estuarine fisheries—predictions of fish production and yield. Estuaries 16:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp Graph Stat 5:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ives MC, Scandol JP (2007) A Bayesian analysis of NSW eastern king prawn stocks (Melicertus plebejus) using multiple model structures. Fish Res 84:314–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kieckbusch DK, Koch MS, Serafy JE, Anderson WT (2004) Trophic linkages among primary producers and consumers in fringing mangroves of subtropical lagoons. Bull Mar Sci 74:271–285Google Scholar
  26. Kyne PM, Bennett MB (2002) Diet of the eastern shovelnose ray, Aptychotrema rostrata (Shaw and Nodder, 1794), from Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 53:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I, Hotelling H (eds) Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp 278–292Google Scholar
  28. MacArthur LD, Babcock RC, Hyndes GA (2008) Movements of the western rock lobster (Panulirus cygnus) within shallow coastal waters using acoustic telemetry. Mar Freshw Res 59:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McTigue TA, Zimmerman RJ (1998) The use of infauna by juvenile Penaeus aztecus (Ives) and Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus). Estuaries 21:160–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moller TH, Jones DA (1975) Locomotory rhythms and burrowing habits of Penaeus semisulcatus (De Haan) and P. monodon (Fabricius) (Crustacea, Penaeidae). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 18:61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montgomery SS (1990) Movements of juvenile eastern king prawns, Penaeus plebejus, and identification of stock along the east-coast of Australia. Fish Res 9:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montgomery SS, Gray CA (1991) Effects of sizes of streamer tags on mortality and growth of juvenile eastern king prawns Penaeus plebejus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 76:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Montgomery S, Winstanley RH (1982) Prawns (east of Cape Otway). Fish situation report no. 6. CSIRO Marine Laboratories, CronullaGoogle Scholar
  34. Montgomery SS, Brett PA, Blount C, Stewart J, Gordon GNG, Kennelly SJ (1995) Loss of tags, double-tagging and release methods for eastern king prawns, Penaeus plebejus (Hess): laboratory and field experiments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 188:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Montgomery SS, Courtney AJ, Blount C, Stewart J, Die DJ, Cosgrove M, O’Neill MF (2007) Patterns in the distribution and abundance of female eastern king prawns, Melicertus plebejus (Hess, 1865), capable of spawning and reproductive potential in waters off eastern Australia. Fish Res 88:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Munro J, Owens L (2007) Yellow head-like viruses affecting the penaeid aquaculture industry: a review. Aquac Res 38:893–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mysterud A (1998) The relative roles of body size and feeding type on activity time of temperate ruminants. Oecologia 113:442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nanjo K, Kohno H, Sano M (2008) Food habits of fishes in the mangrove estuary of Urauchi River, Iriomote Island, southern Japan. Fish Sci 74:1024–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Obrien CJ (1994) Ontogenetic changes in the diet of juvenile brown tiger prawns Penaeus esculentus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 112:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ochwada F, Loneragan N, Gray C, Suthers I, Taylor M (2009) The influence of habitat complexity on habitat preference and predation mortality in postlarval eastern king prawn Penaeus plebejus: implications for stock enhancement. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 380:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ochwada-Doyle F, Loneragan N, Gray C, Taylor M (2010) Using experimental ecology to understand stock enhancement: comparisons of habitat-related predation on wild and hatchery-reared Penaeus plebejus Hess. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 390:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parsons D, Babcock R, Hankin R, Willis T, Aitken J, O’Dor R, Jackson G (2003) Snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) home range dynamics: acoustic tagging studies in a marine reserve. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 262:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Passano LM (1960) Moulting and its control. In: Waterman TH (ed) The physiology of crustacea: metabolism and growth, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 473–536Google Scholar
  44. Quinn G, Keough M (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Port MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruello NV (1973) Burrowing, feeding, and spatial distribution of the school prawn Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell) in the Hunter River region, Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 13:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanders HL (1958) Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. 1. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnol Oceanogr 3:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sih A (1982) Optimal patch use: variation in selective pressure for efficient foraging. Am Nat 120:666–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stark K, Jackson G, Lyle J (2005) Tracking arrow squid movements with an automated acoustic telemetry system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 299:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suthers IM (1984) Functional-morphology of the mouthparts and gastric mill in Penaeus plebejus Hess (Decapoda, Penaeidea). Aust J Mar Freshw Res 35:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanner JE, Deakin S (2001) Active habitat selection for sand by juvenile western king prawns, Melicertus latisulcatus (Kishinouye). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 261:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor MD (2008) Spatial and temporal patterns of habitat use by three estuarine species of mysid shrimp. Mar Freshw Res 59:792–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor MD, Fielder DS, Suthers IM (2006a) Spatial and ontogenetic variation in the diet of wild and stocked mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus, Sciaenidae) in Australian estuaries. Estuar Coast 29:785–793Google Scholar
  53. Taylor MD, Laffan SD, Fielder DS, Suthers IM (2006b) Key habitat and home range of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus) in a south-east Australian estuary: finding the estuarine niche to optimise stocking. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 328:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tinker MT, Bentall G, Estes JA (2008) Food limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:560–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walters CJ, Martell S (2004) Fisheries ecology and management. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  56. Wassenberg TJ, Hill BJ (1984) Molting behavior of the tiger prawn Penaeus esculentus (Haswell). Aust J Mar Freshw Res 35:561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wassenberg TJ, Hill BJ (1987) Natural diet of the tiger prawns Penaeus esculentus and Penaeus semisulcatus. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 38:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wassenberg TJ, Hill BJ (1994) Laboratory study of the effect of light on the emergence behavior of 8 species of commercially important adult penaeid prawns. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 45:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Watson WH, Golet W, Scopel D, Jury S (2009) Use of ultrasonic telemetry to determine the area of bait influence and trapping area of American lobster, Homarus americanus, traps. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res 43:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sydney Institute of Marine ScienceMosmanAustralia
  2. 2.Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental ScienceUniversity of NSWSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations