Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 10, pp 2129–2142 | Cite as

Utilization of partially predated snail shells by the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus Say, 1817

  • Beth M. McGuire
  • Jason D. WilliamsEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus was shown to inhabit shells that were partially predated from intertidal areas of Long Island, New York. Among field collections of P. longicarpus, 2.13% of the hermit crabs (46 of 2155) were found with shells with snail tissue present. Over 90% of these partially predated snail shells were occupied by male hermit crabs. Although hermit crabs were in 8 species of snail shells, only Littorina littorea and Nassarius obsoletus were found occupied by hermit crabs and containing snail tissue. In the laboratory, we found that specimens of the spider crab Libinia emarginata were able to pull off the operculum of snails, leaving damage as found in field collections. In contrast, specimens of P. longicarpus were not able to prey on live, healthy snails. When specimens of P. longicarpus were placed in communal tanks, hermit crabs preferred partially predated snail shells to empty and original shells. However, original shells and empty shells were occupied with more frequency than partially predated shells when crabs were isolated. These findings indicate P. longicarpus actively seeks shells soon after attack and abandonment by snail predators, especially in the presence of competitors.

Keywords

Hermit Crab Empty Shell Spider Crab Snail Shell Gastropod Shell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Julie Heath (Boise State University), Russell Burke (Hofstra University) and three anonymous reviewers for their comments that greatly improved this manuscript. Dr. John J. McDermott (Franklin and Marshall College) kindly provided personal data and gave helpful comments on a previous draft of this work. Dr. Alison Carson (Manhattanville College) provided helpful advice on statistics. The financial support of Hofstra University to the authors is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Abrams PA (1980) Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in a tropical hermit crab community. Oecologia 46:365–379Google Scholar
  2. Asakura A (1995) Sexual differences in life history and resource utilization by the hermit crab. Ecology 76:2295–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes DKA (1999) Ecology of tropical hermit crabs at Quirimba Island, Mozambique: shell characteristics and utilisation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 183:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD (1981) Competitive dynamics of a tropical hermit crab assemblage. Ecology 62:751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertness MD, Cunningham C (1981) Crab shell-crushing predation and gastropod architectural defense. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 50:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brightwell LR (1951) Some experiments with the common hermit crab (Eupagurus bernhardus) Linn. and transparent univalve shells. Proc Zool Soc Lond 121:279–283Google Scholar
  7. Brightwell LR (1953) Further notes on the hermit crab Eupagurus bernhardus and associated animals. Proc Zool Soc Lond 123:61–64Google Scholar
  8. Chiussi R, Diaz H, Rittschof D, Forward RB Jr (2001) Orientation of the hermit crab Clibanarius antillensis: effects of visual and chemical cues. J Crust Biol 21:593–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diaz H, Forward RB Jr, Orihuela B, Rittschof D (1994) Chemically stimulated visual orientation and shape discrimination by the hermit crab Clibanarius vittatus (Bosc). J Crust Biol 14:20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donovan D, Danko J, Carefoot T (1999) Functional significance of shell sculpture in gastropod molluscs: test of a predator-deterrent hypothesis in Ceratostoma foliatum (Gmelin). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236:235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eales NB (1949) The food of the dogfish, Scyliorhinus caniculus L. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 28:791–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekendahl A (1998) Colour polymorphic prey (Littorina saxatilis Olivi) and predatory effects of a crab population (Carcinus maenas L.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 222:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elner RW, Raffaelli DG (1980) Interactions between two marine snails, Littorina rudis and Littorina nigrolineata Gray, a predator, Carcinus maenas (L.), and a parasite, Microphallus similis Jägerkiold. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 43:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elwood RW, Neil SJ (1992) Assessments and decisions: a study of information gathering by hermit crabs. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Gherardi F (2006) Fighting behavior in hermit crabs: the combined effect of resource-holding potential and resource value in Pagurus longicarpus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:500–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gherardi F, Atema J (2005) Effects of chemical context on shell investigation behavior in hermit crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 320:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gherardi F, Tiedemann J (2004) Chemical cues and binary individual recognition in the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus. J Zool 263:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilchrist SA (1984) Specificity of hermit crab attraction to gastropod predation sites. J Chem Ecol 10:569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilchrist SA (2003) Hermit crab population ecology on a shallow coral reef (Bailey’s Cay, Roatan, Honduras): octopus predation and hermit crab shell use. Mem Mus Vict 60:35–44Google Scholar
  20. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (1996) Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab Carcinus maenas. Biol Conserv 78:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadlock RP (1980) Alarm response of the intertidal snail Littorina littorea (l.) to predation by the crab Carcinus maenas (L.). Biol Bull 159:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton I, Heithaus M (2001) The effects of temporal variation in predation risk on anti-predator behaviour: an empirical test using marine snails. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2585–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hazlett BA (1970) Interspecific shell fighting in three sympatric species of hermit crabs in Hawaii. Pac Sci 24:472–482Google Scholar
  24. Hazlett BA (1978) Shell exchange in hermit crabs: aggression, negotiation or both? Anim Behav 26:1278–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hazlett BA (1980) Communication and mutual resource exchange in North Florida hermit crabs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hazlett BA (1981) The behavioral ecology of hermit crabs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hazlett BA (1996) Comparative study of hermit crab responses to shell-related chemical cues. J Chem Ecol 22:2317–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hazlett BA, Herrnkind W (1980) Orientation to shell events by the hermit crab Clibanarius vittatus (Bosc) (Decapoda, Paguridae). Crustaceana 39:311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes M (2000) Deception with honest signals: signal residuals and signal function in snapping shrimp. Behav Ecol 11:614–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Imafuku M (1983) New shell acquisition in the hermit crab, Pagurus geminus. J Ethol 1:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Imafuku M (1984) Quality of shells occupied by the hermit crab Pagurus geminus: how many hermit crabs are satisfied with their shells? J Ethol 2:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Imafuku M, Nakamura Y (1995) Hermit crabs occupying shells that contain soft part of snail. Crust Res 24:19–22Google Scholar
  33. Kellogg CH (1976) Gastropod shells, a potentially limiting resource for hermit crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 22:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kratt CM, Rittschof D (1991) Peptide attraction of hermit crabs Clibanarius vittatus Bosc: roles of enzymes and substrates. J Chem Ecol 17:2347–2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kurata H (1968) Life of hermit crabs. Kagaku-asahi 28:60–61 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  36. LaBarbera M, Merz RA (1992) Postmortem changes in strength of gastropod shells: evolutionary implications for hermit crabs, snails, and their mutual predators. Paleobiology 18:367–377Google Scholar
  37. Lancaster I (1988) Pagurus bernhardus (L.)- an introduction to the natural history of hermit crabs. Field Stud 7:189–238Google Scholar
  38. Lewis SM, Rotjan RD (2009) Vacancy chains provide aggregate benefits to Coenobita clypeatus hermit crabs. Ethology 115:356–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Magalhaes H (1948) An ecological study of snails of the genus Busycon at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecol Monogr 18:377–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mantelatto FL, Meireles AL (2004) The importance of shell occupation and shell availability in the hermit crab Pagurus brevidactylus (Stimpson, 1859) (Paguridae) population from the southern Atlantic. Bull Mar Sci 75:27–35Google Scholar
  41. McClintock TS (1985) Effects of shell condition and size upon the shell choice behavior of a hermit crab. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 88:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDermott JJ (2002) Relationships between the parasitic isopods Stegias clibanarii Richardson, 1904 and Bopyrissa wolffi Markham, 1978 (Bopyridae) and the intertidal hermit crab Clibanarius tricolor (Gibbes, 1850) (Anomura) in Bermuda. Ophelia 56:33–42Google Scholar
  43. McLean RB (1974) Direct shell acquisition by hermit crabs from gastropods. Experientia 30:206–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naczk M, Williams J, Brennana K, Liyanapathiranae C, Shahidic F (2004) Compositional characteristics of green crab (Carcinus maenas). Food Chem 88:429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nyblade CF (1974) Coexistence in sympatric hermit crabs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Palmer A (1979) Fish predation and the evolution of gastropod shell sculpture: experimental and geographic evidence. Evolution 33:697–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pechenik JA, Lewis S (2000) Avoidance of drilled gastropod shells by the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus at Nahant, Massachusetts. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 253:17–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pechenik JA, Hsieh J, Owara S, Wong P, Marshall D, Untersee S, Li W (2001) Factors selecting for avoidance of drilled shells by the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 262:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pezzuti JCB, Turra A, Leite FPP (2002) Hermit crab (Decapod, Anomura) attraction to dead gastropod baits in an infralittoral algae bank. Braz Arch Biol Technol 45:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Provenzano AJ (1960) Notes on Bermuda hermit crabs (Crustacea: Anomura). Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 10:117–124Google Scholar
  51. Purtymun B (1971) Predatism. Hawaiian Shell News 19(5):4Google Scholar
  52. Randall J (1964) Contributions to the biology of the queen conch, Strombus gigas. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 14:246–295Google Scholar
  53. Randeley RW, Thomas MLH (1987) Predatory behaviour of juvenile shore crab Carcinus maenas (L.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 108:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Richardson T, Brown K (1992) Predation risk and feeding in an intertidal predatory snail. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 163:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rittschof D (1980a) Chemical attraction of hermit crabs and other attendants to gastropod predation sites. J Chem Ecol 6:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rittschof D (1980b) Enzymatic production of small molecules attracting hermit crabs to simulated predation sites. J Chem Ecol 6:665–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rittschof D (1992) Chemosensation in the daily life of crabs. Am Zool 32:363–369Google Scholar
  58. Rittschof D, Hazlett BA (1997) Behavioural responses of hermit crabs to shell cues, predator haemolymph and body odour. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 77:737–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rittschof D, Kratt CM, Clare AS (1990) Gastropod predation sites: The role of predator and prey in chemical attraction of the hermit crab Clibanarius vittatus (Bosc). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 70:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rittschof D, Tsai DW, Massey PG, Blanco L, Kueber GL Jr, Haas RJ Jr (1992) Chemical mediation of behavior in hermit crabs: alarm and aggregation cues. J Chem Ecol 18:959–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rittschof D, Sarrica J, Rubenstein D (1995) Shell dynamics and microhabit selection by striped legged hermit crabs, Clibanarius vittatus (Bosc). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 192:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ropes JW (1989) The food habits of five crabs species at Pettaquamscutt River, Rhode Island. Fish Bull 87:197–204Google Scholar
  63. Rosen E, Schwarza B, Palmera AR (2009) Smelling the difference: hermit crab responses to predatory and nonpredatory crabs. Anim Behav 78:691–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rutherford JC (1977) Removal of living snails from their shells by a hermit crab. Veliger 19:438–439Google Scholar
  65. Schenk SC, Wainwright PC (2001) Dimorphism and the functional basis of claw strength in six brachyuran crabs. J Zool Lond 255:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scully EP (1979) The effects of gastropod shell availability and habitat characteristics on shell utilization by the intertidal hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus Say. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 37:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Seed R, Hughes RN (1995) Criteria for prey size-selection in molluscivorous crabs with contrasting claw morphologies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 193:177–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shoup JB (1968) Shell opening by crabs of the genus Calappa. Science 160:887–888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Tricarico E, Gherardi F (2006) Shell acquisition by hermit crabs: which tactic is more efficient? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tricarico E, Gherardi F (2007a) Resource assessment in hermit crabs: the worth of their own shell. Behav Ecol 18:615–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tricarico E, Gherardi F (2007b) The past ownership of a resource affects the agonistic behavior of hermit crabs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1945–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tricarico E, Bertocchi S, Brusconi S, Chessa LA, Gherardi F (2009) Shell recruitment in the Mediterranean hermit crab Clibanarius erythropus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 381:42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tucker AD, Fitzsimmons NN, Gibbons JW (1995) Resource partitioning by the estuarine turtle Malaclemys terrapin: trophic, spatial, and temporal foraging constraints. Herpetologica 51:167–181Google Scholar
  74. Turra A (2003) Shell condition and adequacy of three sympatric intertidal hermit crab populations. J Nat Hist 37:1781–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Turra A, Denadai MR, Leite FPP (2005) Predation on gastropods by shell-breaking crabs: effects on shell availability to hermit crabs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 286:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vance RR (1972) The role of shell adequacy in behavioral interactions involving hermit crabs. Ecology 53:1075–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vermeij G (1977) The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators, and grazers. Paleobiology 3:245–258Google Scholar
  78. Vermeij G (1978) Biogeography and adaptation: patterns of marine life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, CTGoogle Scholar
  79. Vermeij G (1987) Evolution and escalation: an ecological history of life, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  80. Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Walker SE (1989) Hermit crabs as taphonomic agents. Palaios 4:439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Walker SE, Carlton JT (1995) Taphonomic losses becomes taphonomic gains: an experimental approach using the rocky shore gastropod, Tegula funebralis. Palaeogeogr Palaeclimatol Palaeoecol 114:197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wilber TP Jr (1990) Influences of size, species and damage on shell selection by the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus. Mar Biol 104:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilber TP Jr, Herrnkind WF (1984) Predaceous gastropods regulate new shell supply to salt marsh hermit crabs. Mar Biol 79:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Williams JD, McDermott JJ (2004) Hermit crab biocoenoses: a worldwide review of the diversity and natural history of hermit crab associates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 305:1–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyHofstra UniversityHempsteadUSA

Personalised recommendations