Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 9, pp 2029–2042 | Cite as

Connectivity between marine reserves and exploited areas in the philopatric reef fish Chrysoblephus laticeps (Teleostei: Sparidae)

  • P. R. TeskeEmail author
  • F. R. G. Forget
  • P. D. Cowley
  • S. von der Heyden
  • L. B. Beheregaray
Original Paper


‘No-take’ marine protected areas (MPAs) are successful in protecting populations of many exploited fish species, but it is often unclear whether networks of MPAs are adequately spaced to ensure connectivity among reserves, and whether there is spillover into adjacent exploited areas. Such issues are particularly important in species with low dispersal potential, many of which exist as genetically distinct regional stocks. The roman, Chrysoblephus laticeps, is an overexploited, commercially important sparid endemic to South Africa. Post-recruits display resident behavior and occupy small home ranges, making C. laticeps a suitable model species to study genetic structure in marine teleosts with potentially low dispersal ability. We used multilocus data from two types of highly variable genetic markers (mitochondrial DNA control region and seven microsatellite markers) to clarify patterns of genetic connectivity and population structure in C. laticeps using samples from two MPAs and several moderately or severely exploited regions. Despite using analytical tools that are sensitive to detect even subtle genetic structure, we found that this species exists as a single, well-mixed stock throughout its core distribution. The high levels of connectivity identified among sites support the findings of previous studies that have indicated that inshore MPAs are an adequate tool for managing overexploited temperate reef fishes. Even though dispersal of adult C. laticeps out of MPAs is limited, the fact that the large adults in these reserves produce exponentially more offspring than their smaller counterparts in exploited areas makes MPAs a rich source of recruits. We nonetheless caution against concluding that the lack of structure identified in C. laticeps and several other southern African teleosts can be considered to be representative of marine teleosts in this region in general. Many such species are represented in more than one marine biogeographic province and may be comprised of regionally adapted stocks that require individual management.


Genetic Structure Spatial Genetic Structure Distance Class Microsatellite Data Dispersal Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are grateful to the Tsitsikamma research angling team, Rhett Bennett, Russell Chalmers, JD Filmalter, Bruce Donovan, Constantin von der Heyden, Alex Weaver and Sven Kerwath for providing samples. The images of Chrysoblephus laticeps were taken from the book “Coastal fishes of southern Africa”, copyright SAIAB & NISC (, and the map was drawn by Fabien Forget and Bronwyn McLean. Peter Teske was supported by a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship for overseas study from the National Research Foundation and an overseas study grant from the Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust. Sophie von der Heyden was supported by a Claude Harris Leon Postdoctoral Fellowship. This contribution represents manuscript no. 37 of the Molecular Ecology Group for Marine Research (MEGMAR), an initiative initially funded with grant MQ A006162 to L. B. Beheregaray.


  1. Attwood CG, Allen JC, Clasen PJ (2002) Nearshore surface current patterns in the Tsitsikamma National Park, South Africa. S Afr J Mar Sci 24:151–160Google Scholar
  2. Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beerli P, Felsenstein J (2001) Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98:4563–4568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohnsack JA (1990) The potential of marine fishery reserves for reef fish management in the US Southern Atlantic. NOAA tech. Memo NMFS-SEFC-261, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolton JJ, Anderson RJ (1997) Marine vegetation. In: Cowling RM, Richardson DM, Pierce SM (eds) Vegetation of Southern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 348–375Google Scholar
  6. Boyd AJ, Taunton-Clark J, Oberholster GPJ (1992) Spatial features of the near-surface and midwater circulation patterns off western and southern South Africa and their role in the life histories of various commercially fished species. S Afr J Mar Sci 12:189–206Google Scholar
  7. Bradbury IR, Laurel B, Snelgrove PVR, Bentzen P, Campana SE (2008) Global patterns in marine dispersal estimates: the influence of geography, taxonomic category and life history. Proc R Soc B 275:1803–1809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brouwer SL, Griffiths MH, Roberts MJ (2003) Adult movement and larval dispersal of Argyrozona argyrozona (Pisces: Sparidae) from a temperate marine protected area. Afr J Mar Sci 25:395–402Google Scholar
  9. Butler GS (1980) Aspects of the biology of Caffrogobius caffer (Günther) (Pisces: Teleostei: Gobiidae) in the Eastern Cape. MSc Thesis, Rhodes University, GrahamstownGoogle Scholar
  10. Buxton CD (1984) Feeding biology of the roman Chrysoblephus laticeps (Pisces: Sparidae). S Afr J Mar Sci 2:33–42Google Scholar
  11. Buxton CD (1987) Life history changes of two reef fish species in exploited and unexploited marine environments in South Africa. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, pp 215Google Scholar
  12. Buxton CD (1990) The reproductive biology of Chrysoblephus laticeps (Cuvier) and C. cristiceps (Teleostei: Sparidae). J Zool Lond 220:497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buxton CD (1992) The application of yield-per-recruit models to two South African sparid reef species, with special consideration to sex change. Fish Res 15:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buxton CD, Allen JC (1989) Mark and recapture studies of two reef sparids in the Tsitsikamma Coastal National Park. Koedoe 32:39–45Google Scholar
  15. Buxton CD, Smale MJ (1984) A preliminary investigation of the ichthyofauna of the Tsitsikamma Coastal National Park. Koedoe 27:13–24 Google Scholar
  16. Buxton CD, Smale MJ (1989) Abundance and distribution patterns of three temperate marine reef fish (Teleostei: Sparidae) in exploited and unexploited areas off the Southern Cape coast. J Appl Ecol 26:441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cowen RK, Lwiza KMM, Sponaugle S, Paris CB, Olson DB (2000) Connectivity of marine populations: open or closed? Science 287:857–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Crawford NG (2010) smogd: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Res 10:556–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis JA (1996) Investigations into the larval rearing of two South Africa sparid species. MSc thesis, Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawson MN (2001) Phylogeography in coastal marine animals: a solution from California? J Biogeogr 28:723–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L (2002) A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol 11:2571–2581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Edkins MT, Teske PR, Griffiths CL, Papadopulos I (2007) Genetic and morphological analyses suggest that southern African crown crabs, Hymenosoma orbiculare, represent five distinct species. Crustaceana 80:667–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans BS, Sweijd NA, Bowie RCK, Cook PA, Elliott NG (2004) Population genetic structure of the perlemoen, Haliotis midae in South Africa: evidence of range expansion and founder events. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 270:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application of human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Excoffier L, Laval G, Scheider S (2005) arlequin version 3.0: integrated software package for population genetic data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  26. Gell FR, Roberts CM (2003) Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 18:448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gomez-Uchida D, Banks MA (2005) Microsatellite analyses of spatial genetic structure in darkblotched rockfish (Sebastes crameri): is pooling samples safe? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1874–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Götz A, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG, Sauer WWH (2008a) Effects of fishing on population structure and life history of roman Chrysoblephus laticeps (Sparidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Götz A, Cowley PD, Winker H (2008b) Selected fishery and population parameters of eight shore-angling species in the Tsitsikamma National Park no-take marine reserve. Afr J Mar Sci 30:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Götz A, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG, Sauer WWH (2009) Effects of fishing on a temperate reef community in South Africa 1: ichthyofauna. Afr J Mar Sci 31:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goudet J (2001) fstat, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from
  32. Griffiths MH (2000) Long-term trends in catch and effort of commercial linefish off South Africa’s Cape Province: snapshots of the 20th century. S Afr J Mar Sci 22:81–110Google Scholar
  33. Griffiths MH, Wilke CG (2002) Long-term movement patterns of five temperate reef-fishes (Pisces: Sparidae): implications for marine reserves. Mar Freshw Res 53:233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  35. Hauser L, Carvalho GR (2008) Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts. Fish Fish 9:333–362Google Scholar
  36. Hey J, Nielsen R (2004) Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 167:747–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Res 9:1322–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jost L (2008) G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kerwath SE (2005) Empirical studies of fish movement behaviour and their application in spatially explicit models for marine conservation. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  40. Kerwath SE, Götz A, Attwood CG, Cowley PD, Sauer WWH (2007) Movement pattern and home range of Roman Chrysoblephus laticeps. Afr J Mar Sci 29:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kerwath SE, Götz A, Attwood CG, Cowley PD, Sauer WHH (2008) The effect of marine protected ares on an exploited population of sex-changing temperate reef fish: an individual-based model. Afr J Mar Sci 30:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klopper AW (2005) Intraspecific genetic variation in the percoid teleosts Argyrosomus japonicus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1843) and Pomadasys commersonnii (Lacepède, 1801) as inferred from the mitochondrial control region. MSc thesis, University of Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  43. Kramer DL, Chapman MR (1999) Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function. Environ Biol Fish 55:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuhner MK (2006) lamarc 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics 22:768–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Leberg PL (2002) Estimating allelic richness: effects of sample size and bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 11:2445–2449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Leslie H (2005) A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Conserv Biol 19:1701–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levin LA (2006) Recent progress in understanding larval dispersal: new directions and digressions. Integr Comp Biol 46:282–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mann BQ (2000) South African marine linefish status reports. In: Mann BQ (ed) Oceanographic Research Institute, special publication. Durban, S Afr Assoc Mari Biol Res, vol 7, pp 257Google Scholar
  49. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. McQuaid CD, Phillips TE (2000) Limited wind-driven dispersal of the intertidal mussel larvae: in situ evidence from the plankton and the spread of the invasive species Mytilus galloprovincialis in South Africa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 201:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Möller LM, Wiszniewski J, Allen SJ, Beheregaray LB (2007) Habitat type promotes rapid and extremely localized genetic differentiation in dolphins. Mar Freshw Res 58:640–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neethling M, Matthee CA, Bowie RCK, von der Heyden S (2008) Evidence of successful dispersal across a major oceanographic barrier in the southern African endemic, Caffrogobius caffer (Teleostei: Gobiidae). BMC Evol Biol 8:325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nei M, Chesser RK (1983) Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Human Genet 47:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nei M, Tajima F (1981) DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics 97:145–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Norris AT, Bradley DG, Cunningham EP (1999) Microsatellite genetic variation between and within farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations. Aquaculture 180:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Norton OB (2005) The population structure of two estuarine fish species, Atherina breviceps (Pisces: Atherinidae) and Gilchristella aestuaria (Pisces: Clupeidae), along the southern African coastline. MSc thesis, Rhodes University, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  57. Oosthuizen CJ (2007) Genetic variation within the Cape Stumpnose, Rhabdosargus holubi Steindachner (Teleostei: Sparidae). MSc thesis, University of Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  58. Orrell TM, Carpenter KE, Musick JA, Graves JE (2002) Phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of the Sparidae (Perciformes: Percoidei) from cytochrome b sequences. Copeia 2002:618–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation and marine speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) genalex6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rice WA (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberts CM, Andelman S, Branch G, Bustamante RH, Castilla JC, Dugan J, Halpern BS, Lafferty KD, Leslie H, Lubchenco J, McArdle D, Possingham HP, Ruckelshaus M, Warner RR (2003) Ecological criteria for evaluating candidate sites for marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:S199–S214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roberts CM, Hawkins JP, Gell FR (2005) The role of marine reserves in achieving sustainable fisheries. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:123–132 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rocha LA, Robertson DR, Roman J, Bowen BW (2005) Ecological speciation in tropical reef fishes. Proc R Soc B 272:573–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ruzzante DE (1998) A comparison of several measures of genetic distance and population structure with microsatellite data bias and sampling variance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sale PF, Cowen RK, Danilowicz BS, Jones GP, Kritzer JP, Lindeman KC, Planes S, Polunin NVC, Russ GT, Sadovy YV, Steneck RS (2005) Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 20:74–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Sauer WHH, Hecht T, Britz PJ, Mather D (2006) An economical and sectoral study of the South African fishing industry, vol 2: fisheries profile. Report prepared for Marine Coastal Management by Rhodes UniversityGoogle Scholar
  71. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith MKS (2005) Towards a new approach for coastal governance with an assessment of the Plettenberg Bay linefisheries. MSc dissertation, Rhodes University, GrahamstownGoogle Scholar
  74. Stobutzki IC (2001) Marine reserves and the complexity of larval dispersal. Rev Fish Biol Fish 10:515–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tamura K (1992) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C content biases. Mol Biol Evol 9:678–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Teske PR, Papadopoulos I, Zardi GI, McQuaid CD, Griffiths CL, Edkins MT, Barker NP (2007a) Implications of life history for genetic structure and migration rates of five southern African coastal invertebrates: planktonic, abbreviated and direct development. Mar Biol 152:697–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Teske PR, Oosthuizen A, Papadopoulos I, Barker NP (2007b) Phylogeographic structure of South African Octopus vulgaris revisited: identification of a second lineage near Durban harbour. Mar Biol 151:2119–2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Teske PR, Froneman PW, McQuaid CD, Barker NP (2007c) Phylogeographic structure of the caridean shrimp Palaemon peringueyi in South Africa: further evidence for intraspecific genetic units associated with marine biogeographic provinces. Afr J Mar Sci 29:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Teske PR, Papadopoulos I, Newman BK, Dworschak PC, McQuaid CD, Barker NP (2008) Oceanic dispersal barriers, adaptation and larval retention: an interdisciplinary assessment of potential factors maintaining a phylogeographic break between sister lineages of an African prawn. BMC Evol Biol 8:341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Teske PR, Winker H, McQuaid CD, Barker NP (2009a) A tropical/subtropical biogeographic disjunction in southeastern Africa separates two Evolutionarily Significant Units of an estuarine prawn. Mar Biol 165:1265–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Teske PR, McLay C, Sandoval-Castillo J, Papadopoulos I, Newman BK, Griffiths CL, McQuaid CD, Barker NP, Borgonie G, Beheregaray LB (2009b) Tri-locus sequence data reject a “Gondwanan origin hypothesis” for the African/South Pacific crab genus Hymenosoma. Mol Phylogenet Evol 53:23–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Teske PR, Cowley PD, Forget FRG, Beheregaray LB (2009c) Microsatellite markers for the roman, Chrysoblephus laticeps (Teleostei: Sparidae), an overexploited seabream from South Africa. Mol Ecol Res 9:1162–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tilney RL, Nelson G, Radloff SE, Buxton CD (1996) Ichthyoplankton distribution and dispersal in the Tsitsikamma National Park marine reserve, South Africa. S Afr J Mar Sci 17:1–14Google Scholar
  84. Tolley KA, Groeneveld JC, Gopal K, Matthee CA (2005) Mitochondrial DNA panmixia in spiny lobster Palinurus gilchristi suggests a population expansion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 297:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. von der Heyden S (2009) Why do we need to integrate population genetics into South African Marine Protected Area planning? Afr J Mar Sci 31:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. von der Heyden S, Prochazka K, Bowie RCK (2008) Significant population structure amidst expanding populations of Clinus cottoides (Perciformes, Clinidae): application of molecular tools to marine conservation planning in South Africa. Mol Ecol 17:4812–4826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Zardi GI, McQuaid CD, Teske PR, Barker NP (2007) Unexpected genetic structure of mussel populations in South Africa: indigenous Perna perna and invasive Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zardi GI, Nicastro KR, McQuaid CD, Hancke L, Helmuth B (2010) Selection and dispersal, twin drivers for genetic structure in intertidal mussels. J Biogeogr (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. R. Teske
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • F. R. G. Forget
    • 5
  • P. D. Cowley
    • 6
  • S. von der Heyden
    • 7
  • L. B. Beheregaray
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Molecular Ecology Lab, Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and EntomologyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  4. 4.Molecular Ecology and Systematics Group, Botany DepartmentRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  5. 5.Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries ScienceRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  6. 6.South African Institute for Aquatic BiodiversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  7. 7.Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and ZoologyStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations