Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 6, pp 1237–1250 | Cite as

Assessing reef fish assemblage structure: how do different stereo-video techniques compare?

  • Dianne L. WatsonEmail author
  • Euan S. Harvey
  • Ben M. Fitzpatrick
  • Timothy J. Langlois
  • George Shedrawi
Original Paper


Measures of fish abundance, assemblage composition and length were compared when sampled by baited remote underwater stereo-video (stereo BRUV) and diver-operated stereo-video transects (stereo DOV) at the Houtman Abrolhos Islands and Ningaloo Reef. Species richness counts were 40% higher on stereo BRUV than stereo DOV. Stereo BRUVs also recorded a greater number of large-bodied targeted species in higher abundance than stereo DOV (e.g. Lethrinus nebulosus, Plectropomus leopardus) at the Houtman Abrolhos and at Ningaloo Reef. Many non-targeted species were also recorded in greater abundances on stereo BRUV than stereo DOV (e.g. Coris auricularis, Gymnothorax spp). Stereo DOV transects recorded a greater abundance of some small-bodied Pomacentridae, Labridae and Scaridae species than did stereo BRUV, particularly at Ningaloo Reef. This study demonstrates that choice of sampling technique for surveys of reef fish can lead to very different biological interpretations of fish assemblage structure.


Fish Assemblage Scuba Diver Fish Assemblage Structure Tabulate Coral Underwater Visual Census 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was conducted with logistical assistance from the Department of Fisheries Western Australia. Financial assistance was received from The University of Western Australia and from the Australian Government through the Northern Agricultural Catchment Council (NACC). This study forms part of a Western Australian Marine Science Institution (WAMSI) project to assist with the implementation of an Ecosystem Approach to the management of fisheries resources. We would like to thank SONY Australia and R. Scott in the UWA workshop for construction of the stereo-video systems. We greatly appreciate the help by Dr. B. Hutchins in identifying numerous fish species.


  1. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Robinson J (2003) Generalised discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust NZ J Stat 45:301–318. doi: 10.111/1467-842X.00285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principle coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecol 82:511–525. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrew NL, Mapstone BD (1987) Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 25:39–90Google Scholar
  6. Cappo M, Speare P, Wassenberg TJ, Harvey E, Rees M, Heyward A, Pitcher R (2001) Use of baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) to survey demersal fish—how deep and meaningful? In: Harvey ES, Cappo M (eds) Video sensing of the size frequency and abundance of target and non-target fauna in Australian fisheries—a national workshop. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Australia, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  7. Cappo M, Speare P, De’ath G (2004) Comparison of baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) and prawn trawls for assessments of fish biodiversity in inter reefal areas of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 302:123–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2003.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman CJ, Atkinson RJA (1986) Fish behaviour in relation to divers. Prog Underw Sci 11:1–14Google Scholar
  9. Chapman CJ, Johnston ADF, Dunn JR, Creasey DJ (1974) Reactions of fish to sound generated by diver’s open-circuit underwater breathing apparatus. Mar Biol 27:357–366. doi: 10.1007/BF00394372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole RG (1994) Abundance, size structure, and diver-oriented behaviour of three large benthic carnivorous fishes in a marine reserve in northeastern New Zealand. Biol Conserv 70:93–99. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90276-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole RG, Syms C, Davey NK, Gust N, Notman P, Stewart R, Radford CA, Carbines G, Carr MH, Jevs AG (2007) Does breathing apparatus affect fish counts and observations? A comparison at three New Zealand fished and protected areas. Mar Biol 150:1379–1395. doi: 10.1007/s00227-006-0420-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harman N, Harvey E, Kendrick G (2003) Differences in fish assemblages from different reef habitats at Hamelin Bay, south-western Australia. Mar Freshw Res 54:177–184. doi: 10.1071/MF02040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harmelin-Vivien ML, Harmelin JG, Chauvet C, Duval C, Galzin R, Lejeune P, Barnabe G, Blanc F, Chevalier R, Duclerc J, Lasserre G (1985) The underwater observation of fish communities and fish populations—methods and problems. Rev Ecol Terr Vie 40:466–539Google Scholar
  14. Harvey ES, Shortis MR (1996) A system for stereo-video measurement of subtidal organisms. Mar Tech Soc J 29:10–22Google Scholar
  15. Harvey ES, Shortis MR (1998) Calibration stability of an underwater stereo-video system: implications for measurement accuracy and precision. Mar Tech Soc J 329:3–17Google Scholar
  16. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2001a) A comparison of the precision and accuracy of estimates of reef-fish lengths determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fish Bull 99:63–71Google Scholar
  17. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2001b) Improving the statistical power of length estimates of reef fish: a comparison of estimates determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fish Bull 99:72–80Google Scholar
  18. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2002) Estimation of reef fish length by divers and by stereo-video: a first comparison of the accuracy and precision in the field on living fish under operational conditions. Fish Res 57:255–265. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00356-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis MR, Kendrick GA (2004) A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by SCUBA divers and a stereo-video system: implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance. Mar Freshw Res 55:573–580. doi: 10.1071/MF03130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey ES, Cappo M, Butler J, Hall N, Kendrick GA (2007) Bait attraction effects the performance of remote underwater video stations in assessment of demersal fish community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 350:245–254. doi: 10.3354/meps07192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kingsford MJ (1992) Spatial and temporal variation in predation on reef fishes by coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus, Serranidae). Coral Reefs 11:193–198. doi: 10.1007/BF00301993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Grand Y (1957) Light, colour and vision. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Lincoln-Smith MP (1989) Improving multispecies rocky reef fish censuses by counting different groups of species using different procedures. Environ Biol Fish 26:29–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00002473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Munro JL (1974) Mode of operation of antillean fish traps and relationships between ingress, escapement, catch and soak. J Couseil 35:337–350Google Scholar
  25. Priede IG, Bagley PM, Smith A, Creasey S, Merrett NR (1994) Scavenging deep demersal fishes of the Porcupine Seabight, North-east Atlantic: observations by baited camera, trap and trawl. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 74:481–498. doi: 10.1017/S0025315400047615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rotherham D, Underwood AJ, Chapman AG, Gray CA (2007) A strategy for developing scientific sampling tools for fishery-independent surveys of estuarine fish in New South Wales, Australia. ICES J Mar Sci 64:1512–1516. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Samoilys MA, Carlos G (2000) Determining methods of underwater visual census for estimating the abundance of coral reef fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 57:289–304. doi: 10.1023/A:1007679109359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanderson SL, Solonsky AC (1986) Comparison of a rapid visual and strip transect technique for censusing reef fish assemblages. Bull Mar Sci 39:119–129Google Scholar
  29. Spencer ML, Stoner AW, Ryer CH, Munk JE (2005) A towed camera sled for estimating abundance of juvenile flatfishes and habitat characteristics: comparison with beam trawls and divers. Est Coast Shelf Sci 64:497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. St John J (1999) Ontogenetic changes in the diet of the coral reef grouper Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae): patterns in taxa, size and habitat of prey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:233–246. doi: 10.3354/meps180233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stewart BD, Beukers JS (2000) Baited technique improves censuses of cryptic fish in complex habitats. Mar Ecol Pro Ser 197:259–272. doi: 10.3354/meps197259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thresher RE, Gunn JS (1986) Comparative analysis of visual census techniques for highly mobile, reef associated piscivores (Carangidae). Environ Biol Fishes 17:93–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00001740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trenkel VM, Lorance P, Mahévas S (2004) Do visual transects provide true population estimates for deepwater fish? ICES J Mar Sci 61:1050–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Watson DL (2006) Use of underwater stereo-video to measure fish assemblage structure, spatial distribution of fishes and change in assemblages with protection from fishing. Dissertation, The University of Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  35. Watson DL, Harvey ES (2007) Behaviour of temperate and sub-tropical reef fishes towards a stationary SCUBA diver. Mar Freshw Behav Phys 40:85–103. doi: 10.1080/10236240701393263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson DL, Harvey ES, Anderson MJ, Kendrick GA (2005) A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Mar Biol 148:415–425. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-0090-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watson DL, Harvey ES, Kendrick GA, Nardi K, Anderson MJ (2007) Protection from fishing alters the species composition of fish assemblages in a temperate-tropical transition zone. Mar Biol 152:1197–1206. doi: 10.1007/s00227-007-0767-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Willis TJ, Babcock RC (2000) A baited underwater video system for the detection of relative density of carnivorous reef fish. Mar Freshw Res 51:755–763. doi: 10.1071/MF00010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Willis TJ, Millar RB, Babcock RC (2000) Detection of spatial variability in relative density of fishes: comparison of visual census, angling, and baited underwater video. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 198:249–260. doi: 10.3354/meps198249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dianne L. Watson
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Euan S. Harvey
    • 2
  • Ben M. Fitzpatrick
    • 2
  • Timothy J. Langlois
    • 2
  • George Shedrawi
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Marine FuturesThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Plant BiologyThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations