Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 5, pp 1049–1062 | Cite as

Expanding dispersal studies at hydrothermal vents through species identification of cryptic larval forms

  • D. K. Adams
  • S. W. Mills
  • T. M. Shank
  • L. S. Mullineaux
Original Paper


The rapid identification of hydrothermal vent-endemic larvae to the species level is a key limitation to understanding the dynamic processes that control the abundance and distribution of fauna in such a patchy and ephemeral environment. Many larval forms collected near vents, even those in groups such as gastropods that often form a morphologically distinct larval shell, have not been identified to species. We present a staged approach that combines morphological and molecular identification to optimize the capability, efficiency, and economy of identifying vent gastropod larvae from the northern East Pacific Rise (NEPR). With this approach, 15 new larval forms can be identified to species. A total of 33 of the 41 gastropod species inhabiting the NEPR, and 26 of the 27 gastropod species known to occur specifically in the 9° 50′ N region, can be identified to species. Morphological identification efforts are improved by new protoconch descriptions for Gorgoleptis spiralis, Lepetodrilus pustulosus, Nodopelta subnoda, and Echinopelta fistulosa. Even with these new morphological descriptions, the majority of lepetodrilids and peltospirids require molecular identification. Restriction fragment length polymorphism digests are presented as an economical method for identification of five species of Lepetodrilus and six species of peltospirids. The remaining unidentifiable specimens can be assigned to species by comparison to an expanded database of 18S ribosomal DNA. The broad utility of the staged approach was exemplified by the revelation of species-level variation in daily planktonic samples and the identification and characterization of egg capsules belonging to a conid gastropod Gymnobela sp. A. The improved molecular and morphological capabilities nearly double the number of species amenable to field studies of dispersal and population connectivity.

Supplementary material

227_2009_1386_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 22 kb)
227_2009_1386_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (28 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 28 kb)
227_2009_1386_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (91 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 90 kb)
227_2009_1386_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (40 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 39 kb)
227_2009_1386_MOESM5_ESM.doc (89 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOC 89 kb)
227_2009_1386_MOESM6_ESM.doc (42 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOC 42 kb)


  1. Adams DK, Mullineaux LS (2008) Supply of gastropod larvae to hydrothermal vents reflects transport from local larval sources. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1945–1955Google Scholar
  2. Comtet T, Jollivet D, Khripounoff A, Segonzac M, Dixon DR (2000) Molecular and morphological identification of settlement-stage vent mussel larvae, Bathymodiolus azoricus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae), preserved in situ at active vent fields on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1655–1661Google Scholar
  3. Dawson MN, Raskoff KA, Jacobs DK (1998) Field preservation of marine invertebrate tissue for DNA analyses. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 7:145–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Douris V, Cameron RAD, Rodakis GC, Lecanidou R (1998) Mitocondrial phylogeography of the land snail Albinaria in Crete: long-term geological and short-term vicariance effects. Evolution 52:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreyer J, Knick KE, Flickinger WB, Van Dover CL (2005) Development of macrofaunal community structure in mussel beds on the northern East Pacific Rise. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Epifanio CE, Perovich G, Dittel AI, Cary SC (1999) Development and behavior of megalopa larvae and juveniles of the hydrothermal vent crab Bythograea thermydron. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 185:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Govenar B, Freeman M, Bergquist DC, Johnson GA, Fisher CR (2004) Composition of a one-year-old Riftia pachyptila community following a clearance experiment: Insight to succession patterns at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Biol Bull 207:177–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gustafson RG, Littlewood DTJ, Lutz RA (1991) Gastropod egg capsules and their contents from deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments. Biol Bull 180:34–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harasewych MG, McArthur AG (2000) A molecular phylogeny of the Patellogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Mar Biol 137:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson SB, Warén A, Vrijenhoek RC (2008) DNA barcoding of Lepetodrilus limpets reveals cryptic species. J Shellfish Res 27:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khripounoff A, Comtet T, Vangriesheim A, Crassous P (2000) Near-bottom biological and mineral particle flux in the Lucky Strike hydrothermal vent area (Mid-Atlantic Ridge). J Mar Syst 25:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lutz R, Jablonski D, Rhoads D, Turner R (1980) Larval dispersal of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent bivalve from the Galápagos Rift. Mar Biol 57:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lutz RA, Jablonski D, Turner RD (1984) Larval development and dispersal at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Science 226:1451–1454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lutz RA, Bouchet P, Jablonski D, Turner RD, Warén A (1986) Larval ecology of mollusks at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Am Malacol Bull 4:49–54Google Scholar
  15. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2000) MacClade. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassGoogle Scholar
  16. Marsh AG, Mullineaux LS, Young CM, Manahan DT (2001) Larval dispersal potential of the tubeworm Riftia pachyptila at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Nature 411:77–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Matabos M, le Bris N, Pendlebury SJD, Thiebaut E (2008a) Role of physico-chemical environment on gastropod assemblages at hydrothermal vents on the East Pacific Rise (13° N/EPR). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 88:995–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matabos M, Thiebaut E, Le Guen D, Sadosky F, Jollivet D, Bonhomme F (2008b) Geographic clines and stepping-stone patterns detected along the East Pacific Rise in the vetigastropod Lepetodrilus elevatus reflect species crypticism. Mar Biol 153:545–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLean JH (1988) New archaeogastropod limpets from hydrothermal vents—superfamily Lepetodrilacea. 1. Systematic descriptions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 319:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLean JH (1989a) New archaeogastropod limpets from hydrothermal vents—new family Peltospiridae, new superfamily Peltospiracea. Zool Scr 18:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McLean JH (1989b) New slit-limpets (Scissurellacea and Fissurellacea) from hydrothermal vents. Part 1. Systematic descriptions and comparisons based on shell and radular characters. Contrib Sci 407:1–31Google Scholar
  22. McLean JH (1990) Neolepetopsidae, a new docoglossate limpet family from hydrothermal vents and its relevance to patellogastropod evolution. J Zool 222:485–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Metaxas A (2004) Spatial and temporal patterns in larval supply at hydrothermal vents in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1949–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Micheli F, Peterson CH, Johnson GA, Mullineaux LS, Mills SW, Sancho G, Fisher CR, Lenihan HS (2002) Predation structures communities at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Ecol Monogr 72:365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mills SW, Mullineaux LS, Tyler PA (2007) Habitat associations in gastropod species at East Pacific Rise hydrothermal vents (9° 50′N). Biol Bull 212:185–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mullineaux LS, Kim SL, Pooley A, Lutz RA (1996) Identification of archaeogastropod larvae from a hydrothermal vent community. Mar Biol 124:551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mullineaux LS, Peterson CH, Micheli F, Mills SW (2003) Successional mechanism varies along a gradient in hydrothermal fluid flux at deep-sea vents. Ecol Monogr 73:523–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mullineaux LS, Mills SW, Sweetman AK, Beaudreau AH, Metaxas A, Hunt HL (2005) Vertical, lateral and temporal structure in larval distributions at hydrothermal vents. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Palumbi SR (1996) Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Mortiz C, Mable BK (eds) Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., pp 205–248Google Scholar
  30. Pardo LM, Ampuero D, Veliz D (2009) Using morphological and molecular tools to identify megalopae larvae collected in the field: the case of sympatric Cancer crabs. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 89:481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pradillon F, Shillito B, Chervin JC, Hamel G, Gaill F (2004) Pressure vessels for in vivo studies of deep-sea fauna. High Press Res 24:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pradillon F, le Bris N, Shillito B, Young CM, Gaill F (2005) Influence of environmental conditions on early development of the hydrothermal vent polychaete Alvinella pompejana. J Exp Biol 208:1551–1561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pradillon F, Schmidt A, Peplies J, Dubilier N (2007) Species identification of marine invertebrate early stages by whole-larvae in situ hybridisation of 18S ribosomal RNA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 333:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reid DG, Rumbak E, Thomas RH (1996) DNA, morphology and fossils: phylogeny and evolutionary rates of the gastropod genus Littorina. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351:877–895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Savolainen V, Cowan RS, Vogler AP, Roderick GK, Lane R (2005) Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1805–1811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sawada H, Saito H, Hosoi M, Toyohara H (2008) Evaluation of PCR methods for fixed bivalve larvae. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 88:1441–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner RD, Lutz R, Jablonski D (1985) Modes of molluscan larval development at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. In, Jones ML (ed) Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, pp 167–184Google Scholar
  39. Van Dover CL (2003) Variation in community structure within hydrothermal vent mussel beds of the East Pacific Rise. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10:506–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Warén A, Bouchet P (1989) New gastropods from East Pacific hydrothermal vents. Zool Scr 18:67–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warén A, Bouchet P (1993) New records, species, genera, and a new family of gastropods from hydrothermal vents and hydrocarbon seeps. Zool Scr 22:1–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warén A, Bouchet P (2001) Gastropoda and Monoplacophora from hydrothermal vents and seeps; New taxa and records. Veliger 44:116–231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Adams
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. W. Mills
    • 1
  • T. M. Shank
    • 1
  • L. S. Mullineaux
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  2. 2.National Institutes of HealthNIDCRBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations