Marine Biology

, Volume 156, Issue 10, pp 2199–2207 | Cite as

Concordance of genetic and fin photo identification in the great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, off Mossel Bay, South Africa

  • Chrysoula Gubili
  • Ryan Johnson
  • Enrico Gennari
  • W. Hermann Oosthuizen
  • Deon Kotze
  • Mike Meÿer
  • David W. Sims
  • Catherine S. Jones
  • Leslie Robert Noble
Method

Abstract

Visual identification of naturally acquired marks has been a popular if subjective method of animal identification and population estimation over the last 40 years. Molecular genetics has also independently developed objective individual marking techniques during the same period. Here, we assess the concordance of individual great white shark (Carcharodon carharias) dorsal fin recognition and identification, using seven microsatellite loci as the independent unbiased arbiter, over a period of 5 years. As a monitoring technique, fin photographs offer a very good individual identification key for white sharks over a relatively short period of time (5 years), matching with genetic data in about 85% of cases, whilst caution and a continuously updated database is required for animal recognition over a longer period.

References

  1. Anderson SD, Goldman KJ (1996) Photographic evidence of white shark movements in California waters. Calif Fish Game 82(4):182–186Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Hinten G, Paton D, Baverstock PR (2002) A model for the integration of microsatellite genotyping with photographic identification of humpback whales. Mem Qld Mus 47(2):451–457Google Scholar
  3. Araabi BN, Kehtarnavaz N, McKinney T, Hillman G, Würsig B (2000) A string matching computer-assisted system for dolphin photo identification. Ann Biomed Eng 28:1269–1279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arzoumanian Z, Holmberg J, Norman B (2005) An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. J Appl Ecol 42:999–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01117.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonfil R, Meÿer M, Scholl MC, Johnson R, O’Brien S, Oosthuizen H, Swanson S, Kotze D, Paterson M (2005) Transoceanic migration, spatial dynamics, and population linkages of white sharks. Science 310:100–103. doi:10.1126/science.1114898 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonin A, Bellemain E, Bronken Eidesen O, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Taberlet P (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol Ecol 13:3261–3273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boustany AM, Davis SF, Pyle P, Anderson SD, Le Boeuf BJ, Block BA (2002) Expanded niche for white sharks. Nature 415:35–36. doi:10.1038/415035b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw CJA, Mollet HF, Meekan MG (2007) Inferring population trends for the world’s largest fish from mark-recapture estimates of survival. J Anim Ecol 76:480–489. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01201.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calambokidis J, Steiger GH, Ellifrit DK, Troutman B, Bowlby CE (2004) Distribution and abundance of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and other marine mammals off the northern Washington coast. Fish Bull 102:563–580Google Scholar
  10. Castro ALF, Rosa RS (2005) Use of natural marks on population estimates of the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum, at the Atol das Rocas Biological Reserve, Brazil. Environ Biol Fish 72:213–221. doi:10.1007/s10641-004-1479-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman DD, Abercrombie DL, Douady CJ, Pikitch EK, Stanhope MJ, Shivji MS (2003) A streamlined, bi-organelle, multiplex PCR approach to species identification: application to global conservation and trade monitoring of the great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Conserv Genet 4:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chistiakov DA, Hellemans B, Volckaert FAM (2006) Microsatellites and their genomic distribution, evolution, function and applications: a review with special reference to fish genetics. Aquaculture 255:1–29. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coakes A, Gowans S, Simard P, Giard J, Vashro C, Sears R (2005) Photographic identification of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) off the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada. Mar Mamm Sci 21(2):323–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Domeier ML, Nasby-Lucas N (2007) Annual re-sightings of photographically identified white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) at an eastern Pacific aggregation site (Guadalupe Island, Mexico). Mar Biol 150:977–984. doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0380-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drouot-Dulau V, Gannier A (2007) Movements of sperm whale in the western Mediterranean Sea: preliminary photo-identification results. J Mar Biol Ass UK 87:195–200. doi:10.1017/S0025315407054860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dufault S, Whitehead H (1995) An assessment of changes with time in the marking patterns used for photoidentification of individual sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus. Mar Mamm Sci 11(3):335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evett IW, Weir BS (1998) Interpreting DNA evidence: statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzpatrick B, Meekan M, Richards A (2006) Shark attacks on a whale shark (Rhincodon typus) at Ningaloo reef, Western Australia. Bull Mar Sci 78(2):397–402Google Scholar
  19. Fujiwara M, Caswell H (2001) Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature 414:537–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamble L, Ravela S, McGarigal K (2008) Multi-scale features for identifying individuals in large biological databases: an application of pattern recognition technology to the marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum. J Appl Ecol 45:170–180. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01368.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilkinson AK, Pearson HC, Weltz F, Davis RW (2007) Photo-identification of sea otters using nose scars. J Wildlife Manage 71(6):2045–2051. doi:10.2193/2006-410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gowans S, Whitehead H (2001) Photographic identification of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus): sources of heterogeneity from natural marks. Mar Mamm Sci 17(1):76–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gowans S, Dalebout ML, Hooker SK, Whitehead H (2000) Reliability of photographic and molecular techniques for sexing northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus). Can J Zool 78:1224–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hillman GR, Würsig B, Gailey GA, Kehtarnavaz N, Drobyshevsky A, Araabi BN, Tagare HD, Weller DW (2003) Computer-assisted photo-identification of individual marine vertebrates: a multi-species system. Aquat Mamm 1:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karczmarski L, Cockcroft VG (1998) Matrix photo-identification technique applied in studies of free-ranging bottlenose and humpback dolphins. Aquat Mamm 24.3:143–147Google Scholar
  27. Kelly MJ (2001) Computer-aided photograph matching in studies using individual identification: and example from Serengeti cheetahs. J Mammal 82(2):440–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klimley AP, Anderson SD (1996) Residency patterns of white sharks at the South Farallon Islands, California. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG (eds) Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias. Academic, San Diego, pp 365–373Google Scholar
  29. Kohler NE, Turner PA (2001) Shark tagging: a review of conventional methods and studies. Environ Biol Fish 60:191–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langtimm CA, Beck CA, Edwards HH, Fick-Child KJ, Ackerman BB, Barton SL, Hartley WC (2004) Survival estimates for Florida manatees from the photo-identification of individuals. Mar Mamm Sci 20(3):438–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laroche RK, Kock AA, Dill LM, Oosthuizen WH (2007) Effects of provisioning ecotourism activity on the behaviour of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 338:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markowitz TM, Harlin AD, Würsig B (2003) Digital photography improves efficiency of individual dolphin identification. Mar Mamm Sci 19(1):217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meekan MG, Bradshaw CJA, Press M, McLean C, Richards A, Quasnichka S, Taylor JG (2006) Population size and structure of whale sharks Rhincodon typus at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 319:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mizroch SA, Herman LM, Straley JM, Glockner-Ferrari DA, Jurasz C, Darling J, Cerchio S, Gabriele CM, Salden DR, Von Ziegesar O (2004) Estimating the adult survival rate of central north Pacific humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J Mammal 85(5):963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Oosterhout CV, Hutchinson W, Wills D, Shipley P (2004) MICROCHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paetkau D, Strobeck C (1994) Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear population. Mol Ecol 3:489–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paetkau D, Waits LP, Clarkson PL, Craighead L, Vyse E, Ward R, Strobeck C (1998) Variation in genetic diversity across the range of North American brown bears. Conserv Biol 12:418–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pardini AT, Jones CS, Scholl MC, Noble LR (2000) Isolation and characterization of dinucleotide microsatellite loci in the Great White Shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Mol Ecol 9(8):1176–1178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pardini AT, Jones CS, Noble LR, Kreiser B, Malcolm H, Bruce BD, Stevens JD, Cliff G, Scholl MC, Francis M, Duffy CAJ, Martin AP (2001) Sex-biased dispersal of great white sharks. Nature 412:139–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rousset F (2007) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resources 8(1):103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rowat D, Meekan MG, Engelhardt U, Pardigon B, Vely M (2007) Aggregations of juvenile whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) in the Gulf of Tadjoura, Djibouti. Environ Biol Fish 80:465–472. doi:10.1007/s10641-006-9148-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  44. Schrey W, Heist EJ (2002) Microsatellite markers for the shortfin mako and cross-species amplification in lamniformes. Cons Genet 3:459–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sims DW, Speedie CD, Fox AM (2000) Movements and growth of a female basking shark re-sighted after a three year period. J Mar Biol Ass UK 80:1141–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stevick PT, Palsbøll PJ, Smith TD, Bravington MV, Hammond PS (2001) Errors in identification using natural markings: rates, sources, and effects on capture–recapture estimates of abundance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1861–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valière N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00228.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Tienhoven AM, Den Hartog JE, Reijns RA, Peddemors VM (2007) A computer-aided program for pattern-matching of natural marks on the spotted raggedtooth shark Carcharias taurus. J Appl Ecol 44:273–280. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01273.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vincent C, Fedak MA, McConnell BJ, Meynier L, Saist-Jean C, Ridoux V (2005) Status and conservation of grey seal, Halichoerus grypus, in France. Biol Conserv 126:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity amond genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10:249–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson B, Hammond PS, Thompson PM (1999) Estimating size and assessing trends in a coastal bottlenose dolphin population. Ecol Appl 9(1):288–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chrysoula Gubili
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ryan Johnson
    • 3
    • 4
  • Enrico Gennari
    • 4
  • W. Hermann Oosthuizen
    • 5
  • Deon Kotze
    • 5
  • Mike Meÿer
    • 5
  • David W. Sims
    • 2
    • 6
  • Catherine S. Jones
    • 1
  • Leslie Robert Noble
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenScotland, UK
  2. 2.The LaboratoryMarine Biological Association of the United KingdomPlymouthUK
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research InstituteUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Oceans ResearchMossel BaySouth Africa
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Affairs and TourismBranch Marine and Coastal ManagementRoggebaaiSouth Africa
  6. 6.Marine Biology and Ecology Research Group, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations