Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 152, Issue 1, pp 165–177 | Cite as

Habitat use by dusky dolphin in patagonia: how predictable is their location?

  • Griselda V. GaraffoEmail author
  • Silvana L. Dans
  • Susana N. Pedraza
  • Enrique A. Crespo
  • Mariana Degrati
Research Article

Abstract

Off Patagonian coasts, Argentina, the dusky dolphin is one of the most common small cetaceans. This species is the aim of newly developed watching activities during summer in Golfo Nuevo. However, the real occurrence and movement pattern are unknown. The objectives of this work were to investigate the predictability of dusky dolphin distribution, group structure and behaviour in the western portion of Golfo Nuevo, with respect to environmental features (bottom depth, bottom slope, distance from shore and substrate). Random transects in the bay were searched by small boat during the summer and autumn of 2001–2004. When a group of dolphins was sighted, estimates of group size, composition (mothers with calves, adults and juveniles only, and mixed groups) and the predominant activity (feeding, travelling, socialising, resting and milling) were recorded and thereafter at 2 min intervals. A grid of 1.5 × 1.5 km was constructed and each cell was characterised by environmental features, Area Use Index (percent of total annual search effort) and Activity Index (predominant behaviour of groups observed in that cell). Mothers with calves and smaller groups and resting behaviour occurred in shallowest waters supporting the idea/hypothesis that movement to shallower water is related to increased safety for individuals. Travelling occurred in the deepest areas with other behaviours observed in intermediate depths. Dolphin distribution within the bay differed significantly between years, but this was not related to any of the factors analysed in this study. Although there was considerable variation between years, in general, dolphins were found in deeper waters further from shore (except for mother–calf groups) and over areas with steeper seafloor gradient. The high variability in the distribution of the animals does not allow for the generation of a simple, area-specific management plan.

Keywords

Killer Whale Bottlenose Dolphin Nautical Chart Principal Component Account Patagonian Coast 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research received logistic and institutional support from Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET) and the University of Patagonia. Funds were received from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT N° 01–4030 A and PICT N° 11679), CONICET (PID 320/99), Fundación BBVA, Project PNUD ARG-02/018 (B-B27) and Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Fieldwork was assisted by Hydrosport SRL, J. Owen and volunteers from Universidad de la Patagonia (Argentina) and Universidad de la República (Uruguay). We thank B. Berón Vera and R. Loizaga de Castro for helpful comments on the manuscript. Thanks are also given to B. Rossiter, Cetacean Society International, for the grant to S.L. Dans who attended the 16 th European Cetacean Society Conference in Liege, and to M. Degrati and G.V. Garaffo who attended the 11° RT in Ecuador. We thank anonymous referees for their contributions that greatly improved the quality of this manuscript.

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behavior 49:227–267Google Scholar
  2. Au DWK, Perryman WL, Perrin WF (1979) Dolphin distribution and the relationship to environmental features in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. NMFS/SWFC Administ. Rep. No. LJ-79–43Google Scholar
  3. Ballance LB (1990) Residence patterns, group organization and surfacing associations of bottlenose dolphins in Kino Bay, In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. Gulf of California, Mexico. Academic, New York, pp 262–274Google Scholar
  4. Ballance LT (1992) Habitat use patterns and ranges of the Bottlenose Dolphin in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar Mamm Sci 8(3):262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgarther MF (1997) The distribution of Risso´ dolphin (Grampus griseus) with respect to the physiography of the northern gulf of Mexico. Mar Mamm Sci 13(4):614–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgarther MF, Mullin KD, May LN, Leming TD (2001) Cetacean habitats in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish Bull (Wash DC) 99:219–239Google Scholar
  7. Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Gales N, Mann J (2006) Interpreting short-term behavioural responses to disturbance within a longitudinal perspective. Anim Behav 72:1149–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Gales N, Mann J, Connor RC, Heithaus M, Watson-Capps J, Flaherty C, Krützen M (2007) Decline in relative abundance of bottlenose dolphins exposed to long-term disturbance. Conserv Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Børje A (2001) How are marine mammal habitats in an ocean of variability? In: Evans PGH, Raga JA (eds) Marine mammals: biology and conservation. Kluwer, Dordercht, pp 63–91Google Scholar
  10. Bräger S, Harraway JA, Manly BFJ (2003) Habitat selection in a coastal dolphin species (Cephalorhyncus hectori). Mar Biol 143:233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cañadas A, Sagarminaga R, García-Tiscar S (2002) Cetacean distribution related with depth and slope in Mediterranean waters off sourthern Spain. Deep-Sea Res I 49:2053–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carretta JV, Taylor BL, Chivers SJ (2001) Abundance and depth distribution of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in northern California determined from a 1995 ship survey. Fish Bull (Wash DC) 99:19–39Google Scholar
  13. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models. Sinauer Associates, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Constantine R, Visser I, Buurman D, Buurman R, McFadden B (1998) Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) predation on dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) in Kaikoura, New Zealand. Mar Mamm Sci 14:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Constantine R, Brunton DH, Dennis T (2004) Dolphin-watching tour boats change bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behaviour. Biol Conserv 117:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coscarella MA, Dans SL, Crespo EA, Pedraza SN (2003) Potential impact of dolphin watching unregulated activities in Patagonia. J Cet Res Mgment 5(1):77–84Google Scholar
  18. Crespi Abril AC, García NA, Crespo EA, Coscarella MA (2003) Consumption of Marine Mammals by Broadnose Savengill Shark Notorynchus cepedianus in the Northern and Central Patagonian Shelf. Latin Am J Aquat Mamm 2(2):101–107Google Scholar
  19. Crespo EA, Pedraza SN, Coscarella M, García NA, Dans SL, Iñiguez M, Reyes LM, Koen Alonso M, Schiavini ACM, González R (1997) Distribution of dusky dolphins Lagenorhynchus obscurus (Gray, 1828) in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean with notes on herd size. Rep Int Whal Commn 47:693–698Google Scholar
  20. Dans SL, Crespo EA, Koen Alonso M, Pedraza SN (2003a) Incidental catch of dolphins in trawling fisheries off Patagonia, Argentina: can populations persist?. Ecol Appl 13(3):754–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dans SL, Koen Alonso M, Crespo EA, Pedraza SN, García NA (2003b) Interactions between marine mammals and high seas fisheries in patagonia under an integrated approach. In: Gales N, Hindell M, Kirkwood R (eds) Marine mammals: fisheries; tourism and management issues. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 100–115Google Scholar
  22. Degrati M, Dans SL, Pedraza SN, Crespo EA, Garaffo GV (2007) Diurnal behavior of dusky dolphins, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, in Golfo Nuevo, Argentina. J Mammal (submitted)Google Scholar
  23. Elwen SH, Best PB (2004a) Environmental factors influencing the distribution of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) on the south coast of South Africa I: broad scale patterns. Mar Mamm Sci 20(3):567–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elwen SH, Best PB (2004b) Environmental factors influencing the distribution of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) on the south coast of South Africa I: within bay distribution. Mar Mamm Sci 20(3):583–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferlt D, Jefferson TA, Moreno IB, Zerbini AN, Mullin KD (2003) Distribution of the Clymene dolphin Stenella clymene. Mamm Rev 33:253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fiedler PC, Barlow J, Gerrodette T (1998) Dolphin prey abundance determined from acoustic backscatter data in eastern Pacific surveys. Fish Bull (Wash DC) 96:237–247Google Scholar
  27. Guerra A (1992). Fauna Ibérica, vol 1. Mollusca. Cephalopoda. In: Ramos MA et al (eds) Fauna Ibérica, vol 1. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, 327 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen JE, Martos P, Madirolas A (2001) Relationship between spatial distribution of the Patagonian stock of Argentine anchovy, Engraulis anchoita, and sea temperatures during late to early summer. Fish Oceanogr 10(2):193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heithaus MR, Dill LM (2002) Food availability and tiger sharkpredation risk influence bottlenose dolphin habitat use. Ecology 83:480–491Google Scholar
  30. Hooker SK, Whitehead H, Gowans S, Baird RW (2002) Fluctuations in distribution and patterns of individual range use of northern bottlenose whales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 225:287–297Google Scholar
  31. Hui CA (1979) Undersea topography and distribution of dolphins of the genus Delphinus in the southern California Bight. J Mammal 60:521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hui CA (1985) Undersea topography and the comparative distributions of two pelagic dolphins. Fish Bull 83:472–475Google Scholar
  33. Ingram SN, Rogan E (2002) Identifying critical areas and habitat preferences of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 244:247–255Google Scholar
  34. Jaquet N, Whitehead H (1996) Scale-dependent correlation of sperm whale distribution with environmental features and productivity in the South Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 135:1–9Google Scholar
  35. Karczmarski L, Cockcroft VG, McLachlan A (2000) Habitat use and preferences of Indo-Pacific humpback Sousa chinensis in Algoa Bay, South Africa. Mar Mamm Sci 16(1):65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koen Alonso M, Crespo EA, García NA, Pedraza SN, Coscarella MA (1998) Diet of dusky dolphins, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, in waters off Patagonia, Argentina. Fish Bull 96:336–374Google Scholar
  37. Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (1983) The Sierra club handbook of whales and dolphins. Sierra Club books, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  38. Litvaitis JA, Titus K, Anderson EM (1994) Measuring vertebrate use of terrestrial habitats and foods. In: Th. Bookhout A (eds) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 254–274Google Scholar
  39. Lusseau D (2003) The effects of tour boats on the behavior of bottlenose dolphins: using Markov chains to model anthropogenic impacts. Conserv Biol 17(6):1785–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lusseau D (2004) The hidden cost of tourism: Effects of interactions with tour boats on the behavioural budget of two populations of bottlenose dolphins in Fiordland, New Zealand. Ecology and Society 9(1):2. Availble on URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art2
  41. LusseauD, Higham JES (2004) Managing the impacts of dolphin-based tourism through the definition of critical habitats: the case of Doubtful Sound. New Zealand Tourism Manage 25(6):657–667Google Scholar
  42. Mann J (1999) Behavioral sampling methods for cetaceans: a review and critique. Mar Mamm Sci 15(1):102–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mann J, Connor RC, Barre LM, Heithaus MR (2000) Female reproductive success in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.): life history, habitat, provisioning, and group-size effects. Behav Ecol 11:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mouzo FH, Garza ML, Izquierdo JF, Zibecchi RO (1978) Rasgos de la geología submarina del Golfo Nuevo. Acta Oceanográfica Argentina 2(1):69–91Google Scholar
  45. Naud MJ, Long B, Brethes JC, Sears R (2003) Influences of underwater bottom topography and geomorphology on minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) distribution in the Mingan Islands (Canada). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:889–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norris KS, Dohl TP (1980) The behavior of the Hawaiian spinner dolphin, Stenella longirostris. Fish Bull US 77:821–849Google Scholar
  47. Payne PM, Nicolas JR, O´Brien L, Powers KD (1986) Distribution of the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) on Georges Bank and in the Gulf of Maine in relation to densities of the sand eel (Ammodytes americanus). Fish Bull 84:271–277Google Scholar
  48. Redfern JV, Ferguson MC, Becker EA, Hyrenbach KD, Good C, Barlow J, Kaschner K, Baumgartner MF, Forney KA, Ballance LT, Fauchald P, Halpin P, Hamazaki T, Pershing AJ, Qian SS, Read A, Reilly SB, Torres L, Werner F (2006) Techniques for cetacean-habitat modeling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 310:271–295Google Scholar
  49. Rubin JP (1997) La influencia de los procesos físico-químicos y biológicos en la composición y distribución del ictioplancton estival en el mar de Alborán y estrecho de Gibraltar. Informe Técnico del Instituto Español de Oceanografía 24, 88ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Saayman GS, Tayler CK (1979) The socioecology of humpback dolphins (Sousa sp.) In: Winn HE, Olla BL (eds) Behavior of marine animals, vol 3. Plenum Press, NewYork, pp 165–226Google Scholar
  51. Schiavini ACM, Pedraza SN, Crespo EA, González R, Dans SL (1999) Abundance of dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) off north and central Patagonia, Argentina, in spring and comparison with incidental catch in fisheries. Mar Mamm Sci 15(3):828–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1995) Estadística no paramétrica aplicada a la ciencia de la conducta, 4° edn. MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  53. Sutcliffe WH, Brodie PF (1977) Whale distributions in Nova Scotia waters. Fish Mar Serv Tech Rep No 722:1–89Google Scholar
  54. Svedrup HU, Johnson MW, Fleming RH (1942) The oceans, their physics, chemistry and general biology. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas PO, Taber SM (1984) Mother-infant intereaction and behavioral development in southern right whales, Eubalaena australis. Behaviour 88:42–60Google Scholar
  56. Thomson DH, Fissel DB, Marko JR, Davis RA, Borstad GA (1986) Distribution of bowhead whales in relation to hydrometerological events in the Beaufort Sea. Environmental Studies Revolving Funds Report No. 918, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  57. Torres LG, Rosel PE, D´Agrosa C, Read AJ (2003) Improving management of overlapping bottlenose dolphin ecotypes through spatial analysis and genetics. Mar Mamm Sci 19:502–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wells RS, Norris KS (1994) The island habitat. In: Norris KS, Würsig B, Wells RS, Würsig M (eds) The Hawaiian spinner dolphin. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 31–53Google Scholar
  59. Wells RS, Irvine AB, Scott MD (1980) The social ecology of inshore odontocetes. In: Herman LM (ed) Cetacean behavior: mechanisms and processes. Wiley, New York, pp 263–317Google Scholar
  60. Wilson B, Thompson PM, Hammond PS (1997) Habitat use by bottlenose dolphins: seasonal distribution and stratified movement patterns in the Moray Firth, Scotland. J Appl Ecol 34:1365–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Würsig B, Würsig M (1979) Behavior and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, in the South Atlantic. Fish Bull (Wash DC) 77:399–412Google Scholar
  62. Würsig B, Würsig M (1980) Behavior and ecology of the dusky dolphin, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, in the South Atlantic. Fish Bull 77(4):871–890Google Scholar
  63. Würsig B, Cipriano F, Slooten E, Constantine R, Barr K, Yin S (1997) Dusky dolphins (Laghenorhynchus obscurus) off New Zealand: status of present knowledge. Rep Int Whal Commn 47:715–722Google Scholar
  64. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Griselda V. Garaffo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Silvana L. Dans
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susana N. Pedraza
    • 1
    • 2
  • Enrique A. Crespo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mariana Degrati
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Mamíferos MarinosCentro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET)Puerto MadrynArgentina
  2. 2.Universidad Nacional de la PatagoniaPuerto MadrynArgentina

Personalised recommendations